Many years ago, I read Clayton Christensen’s “The Innovator’s Dilemma” and “The Innovator’s Solution.” These two books shaped my view of several business issues. “The Content Trap,” also written by a Harvard Business School professor, has the same impact on me.
The book is about corporation strategies in the digital world. More specifically, it talks about how content providers (media, entertainment, education, etc.) should survive in the digital age, where it is increasingly difficult to get noticed and get paid. The premise of the book is that one should not focus on producing better contents than competitors. Instead, one should discover and foster connections in several dimensions to increase one’s value on the market. Such connection exists in three dimensions.
The first is user connections. Instead of the relationship between a content provider and a user, it is more important and valuable to have the “network effect,” i.e., the value of service increases as the number of users increases. The network effect happens, for example, when many people use the social network or exchange software written for the same computer system. Therefore, a content provider should self-identify as a community builder, to cultivate an ecosystem of connected users. Such view results in some counter-intuitive success stories. For example, a newspaper survives digitization by focusing on integrating the nation’s classified ad market, because the classified ad has network effect: the more people visiting the site, the more valuable the site is for everyone. Another example is New York Time’s paywall strategy. By bundling several contents (news, opinions, fashion, sports, etc.) together in pricing, it makes the product appealing to a large group of users with varying preferences. The Chinese game company Tencent gained initial success by selling digital avatar images for its instant messaging and gaming products. Such images, although bearing virtually no cost to produce, have great value to the customers because of the user connections.
The second dimension is product connections. Products can be complementary, such as software and hardware. They can help each other to get noticed (piggyback effects). They can also attract users to use other products (such as TV programs in consecutive time slots). Instead of focusing on the quality and profitability of individual products, one should focus on recognizing and designing product portfolios containing mutual-enhancing products. Typically, one cannot create or even predict a viral outcome. Something goes viral for various reasons. So we need to have the capability of responding to a viral product, and use it to help other products. It is also essential to capture the most value in a chain of complementary products.
Decision connections are the third dimension. One should not view business decisions and choices as separated ones and try to optimize each one. Instead, all decisions and choices are connected, and they are driven by the overall strategy. The strategy defines what customer needs one wants to address, and from what angle. Such strategy choice then determines a web of interconnected decisions. So don’t try to copy successful practices from others, They probably won’t fit into your strategy.
In addition to the beneficial points, the book was very well written, just as Christensen’s books mentioned above. It uses the case study approach, which is the hallmark of Harvard Business School. The “story-theory” approach is used by many nonfiction books. However, this book is unique in that it does not include extraneous details of the stories. So the whole book is fascinating and fast-paced. It eloquently explains basic economic principles such as the network effect and complementary. Such explanations allow people with little economics background to follow the narrative. However, people already with such knowledge are not bored by such discourse. The book also has a clear logical line, and thus easy to follow.
Overall, this is a book worth multiple reads.