What do you think?
Rate this book
Footsteps in the Dark
Locals claim the Priory is haunted and refuse to put a single toe past the front door. Left empty for years, and even their deceased uncle chose to live in a different house, far away from this particular property. But the ramshackle old house, with its rambling charm is the perfect setting for a much-needed holiday for siblings Peter, Celia and Margaret, who have inherited it from their uncle. It wasn't the lack of modern conveniences that made a summer spent at the ancient priory mansion such an unsettling experience. It was the supposed ghost... or whatever was groaning in the cellars and roaming the countryside around Framley Village after dark.
But when a murder victim is discovered in the drafty Priory halls, the once unconcerned trio begins to fear that the ghostly rumors are true and they are not alone after all! But traditionally ghosts don't commit murder. And in this case, the things which go bump in the night are deadly. With a killer on the loose, will they find themselves the next victims or will they uncover the true in time? Does the key to the crime lie in the realm of the supernaturalr? Or is the explanation much more down to earth with a more corporeal culpritl of flesh and blood?
But when a murder victim is discovered in the drafty Priory halls, the once unconcerned trio begins to fear that the ghostly rumors are true and they are not alone after all! But traditionally ghosts don't commit murder. And in this case, the things which go bump in the night are deadly. With a killer on the loose, will they find themselves the next victims or will they uncover the true in time? Does the key to the crime lie in the realm of the supernaturalr? Or is the explanation much more down to earth with a more corporeal culpritl of flesh and blood?
304 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1932
538 people are currently reading
4349 people want to read
About the author
Georgette Heyer
252 books5,517 followersGeorgette Heyer was a prolific historical romance and detective fiction novelist. Her writing career began in 1921, when she turned a story for her younger brother into the novel The Black Moth.
In 1925 she married George Ronald Rougier, a mining engineer. Rougier later became a barrister and he often provided basic plot outlines for her thrillers. Beginning in 1932, Heyer released one romance novel and one thriller each year.
Heyer was an intensely private person who remained a best selling author all her life without the aid of publicity. She made no appearances, never gave an interview and only answered fan letters herself if they made an interesting historical point. She wrote one novel using the pseudonym Stella Martin.
Her Georgian and Regencies romances were inspired by Jane Austen. While some critics thought her novels were too detailed, others considered the level of detail to be Heyer's greatest asset.
Heyer remains a popular and much-loved author, known for essentially establishing the historical romance genre and its subgenre Regency romance.
In 1925 she married George Ronald Rougier, a mining engineer. Rougier later became a barrister and he often provided basic plot outlines for her thrillers. Beginning in 1932, Heyer released one romance novel and one thriller each year.
Heyer was an intensely private person who remained a best selling author all her life without the aid of publicity. She made no appearances, never gave an interview and only answered fan letters herself if they made an interesting historical point. She wrote one novel using the pseudonym Stella Martin.
Her Georgian and Regencies romances were inspired by Jane Austen. While some critics thought her novels were too detailed, others considered the level of detail to be Heyer's greatest asset.
Heyer remains a popular and much-loved author, known for essentially establishing the historical romance genre and its subgenre Regency romance.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 816 reviews
May 20, 2025
Heyer goes full Scooby-Doo!
When the grown Fortescue siblings inherit a house, the two sisters (Cecily and Margaret), their brother (Peter), their elderly aunt (Mrs. Bosanquet), and Cecily's husband (Charles) all pile in together with their faithful servants Mr. & Mrs. Bowers for a vacation.
Even though it's haunted.
And of course they don't believe the local legends, so it's a surprise when a terrifying apparition known only as The Monk starts showing up to terrorize them.
This book has everything you need on a rainy day.
Mystery, romance, ghosts, misunderstandings, humor, secret panels - even skeletons in the closets.
Well, maybe not in the closets, but you get the picture.
Even the unmasking of the villain at the end took me back to my childhood, watching the OG Scooby show. You know, before those meddling kids ruined it.
I think most readers will have long before guessed who it is, but as the police pull the disguise off, the main characters do the GASP! thing to perfection.
This was a silly mystery, not a serious thriller, but I had fun listening to it.
Recommended.
When the grown Fortescue siblings inherit a house, the two sisters (Cecily and Margaret), their brother (Peter), their elderly aunt (Mrs. Bosanquet), and Cecily's husband (Charles) all pile in together with their faithful servants Mr. & Mrs. Bowers for a vacation.
Even though it's haunted.
And of course they don't believe the local legends, so it's a surprise when a terrifying apparition known only as The Monk starts showing up to terrorize them.
This book has everything you need on a rainy day.
Mystery, romance, ghosts, misunderstandings, humor, secret panels - even skeletons in the closets.
Well, maybe not in the closets, but you get the picture.
Even the unmasking of the villain at the end took me back to my childhood, watching the OG Scooby show. You know, before those meddling kids ruined it.
I think most readers will have long before guessed who it is, but as the police pull the disguise off, the main characters do the GASP! thing to perfection.
This was a silly mystery, not a serious thriller, but I had fun listening to it.
Recommended.
July 11, 2013
for those fans of cozy mysteries, particularly the ones featuring goofy aristocrats stuck in an eerie mansion with murder in the background and light banter constantly in the foreground, please ignore the 2 stars. this is a 4 star book for you.
so a group of la-di-da, fiddle-dee-dee upper class English types, their aunt, and couple of their servants take over a Bad House with a Bad History for their summer vacation. haunting and terrorizing them is the dreaded, maybe-a-ghost Monk, who apparently has a lot of death on his hands. eventually murder occurs. what is behind all of these sinister shenanigans? and who is this mysterious Mr. Strange - a potential lover or a dreadful villain lying in wait?
I have no doubt that Heyer knows how to write and it is hard for me to put a finger on what left me cold. perhaps it was due to the dialogue being light but not bubbly or sparkling - and I wanted champagne not tap water! perhaps it was due to the characters being basically quite unremarkable and uninteresting and even rather interchangeable. perhaps it was due to being able to figure out the identity of the dread villain fairly early on. maybe I should just blame the tepid romance. I dunno. but this one did leave me with a feeling of EH? EH! and that means 2 stars.
so a group of la-di-da, fiddle-dee-dee upper class English types, their aunt, and couple of their servants take over a Bad House with a Bad History for their summer vacation. haunting and terrorizing them is the dreaded, maybe-a-ghost Monk, who apparently has a lot of death on his hands. eventually murder occurs. what is behind all of these sinister shenanigans? and who is this mysterious Mr. Strange - a potential lover or a dreadful villain lying in wait?
I have no doubt that Heyer knows how to write and it is hard for me to put a finger on what left me cold. perhaps it was due to the dialogue being light but not bubbly or sparkling - and I wanted champagne not tap water! perhaps it was due to the characters being basically quite unremarkable and uninteresting and even rather interchangeable. perhaps it was due to being able to figure out the identity of the dread villain fairly early on. maybe I should just blame the tepid romance. I dunno. but this one did leave me with a feeling of EH? EH! and that means 2 stars.
September 18, 2016
It is books like this that cause me to remember why I love mysteries so much. I had so much fun reading this. It was a little like reading a grown up version of a Nancy Drew, only with some Agatha Christie-like elements.
Think:
meets
and you have an idea of what I'm talking about.
Footsteps in the Dark is, I believe, Heyer's first attempt to pen a murder mystery, and though some would argue that it lacks the polish of her later mysteries, I think it's the best of the eight I've read so far. I appreciate that the sleuths aren't professionals (Heyer later used the recurring Scotland Yard detectives Hannasyde and Hemingway for her novels). Instead, a good majority of the "detecting" is done by a foursome consisting of 3 siblings (Peter, Margaret and Celia) and Celia's spouse, Charles. They, along with their unintentionally funny aunt Mrs. Bosanquet, have been left an ancient Priory house and intend to refurbish it into a country retreat. Not long after settling in, the locals regale them with the spooky truth: the Priory is haunted by "The Monk", a ghostly, faceless figure seen roaming the estate. No one thinks they should stay there, but the siblings are determined to reveal the identity of "The Monk" and determine whether he is corporeal or not. After a series of gothic incidences including eerie moaning, hidden passages, crypts, a skeleton-inhabited priest hole, spectral visitors, a murder victim and a wide array of local suspects, Peter, Margaret, Celia and Charles finally uncover the truth about the mysterious goings-on at the priory.
It's a cheeky, funny and page turning ride. The characters are interesting without being overly obnoxious (as sometimes happens in Heyer's mysteries). The banter and comraiderie are witty and very in keeping with sibling and spousal relationships. While it is campy in places, the story is written with a firm tongue-in-cheek by Heyer. I would have enjoyed seeing Aunt Bosanquet in another Heyer book - she was that good. It also featured a very subtle love story which played out nicely (but with just enough bumps along the way to keep it interesting).
A definite re-read one of these days, and an instant favorite on my shelf.
Think:
meets
and you have an idea of what I'm talking about.Footsteps in the Dark is, I believe, Heyer's first attempt to pen a murder mystery, and though some would argue that it lacks the polish of her later mysteries, I think it's the best of the eight I've read so far. I appreciate that the sleuths aren't professionals (Heyer later used the recurring Scotland Yard detectives Hannasyde and Hemingway for her novels). Instead, a good majority of the "detecting" is done by a foursome consisting of 3 siblings (Peter, Margaret and Celia) and Celia's spouse, Charles. They, along with their unintentionally funny aunt Mrs. Bosanquet, have been left an ancient Priory house and intend to refurbish it into a country retreat. Not long after settling in, the locals regale them with the spooky truth: the Priory is haunted by "The Monk", a ghostly, faceless figure seen roaming the estate. No one thinks they should stay there, but the siblings are determined to reveal the identity of "The Monk" and determine whether he is corporeal or not. After a series of gothic incidences including eerie moaning, hidden passages, crypts, a skeleton-inhabited priest hole, spectral visitors, a murder victim and a wide array of local suspects, Peter, Margaret, Celia and Charles finally uncover the truth about the mysterious goings-on at the priory.
It's a cheeky, funny and page turning ride. The characters are interesting without being overly obnoxious (as sometimes happens in Heyer's mysteries). The banter and comraiderie are witty and very in keeping with sibling and spousal relationships. While it is campy in places, the story is written with a firm tongue-in-cheek by Heyer. I would have enjoyed seeing Aunt Bosanquet in another Heyer book - she was that good. It also featured a very subtle love story which played out nicely (but with just enough bumps along the way to keep it interesting).
A definite re-read one of these days, and an instant favorite on my shelf.
March 7, 2016
A solid 4.5 stars!
My very first Heyer mystery! This is cause for celebration! Also my first cozy-mystery in ages, and it's now got me hooked on the genre! More celebration!
I really, really enjoyed myself with Footsteps in the Dark. It was spooky, exciting, suspenseful, and just plain good fun! The mystery was rather easy to solve (it didn't take me long to figure out the villain's identity, and who was actually on the good side), but it still kept me on edge and turning the pages in excited anticipation to see how it would all unravel. I'm pretty sure that the eerie-creepy-mansion-full-of-ghosts-and-secret-passages plot has been done many a time, but since I'm a newbie to the genre, it was all new and intriguing to me. Plus, it's a Georgette Heyer novel, so you're guaranteed a few laughs and witty repartee along the way, just to make things ever more engaging!
I would have given it a solid 5 if it hadn't been for a few slow parts that I wish read through faster, the romance that felt a little too out of the blue, and the fact that the characters were no way near as well developed as I know Georgette Heyer can develop. They were a fun set and I loved Charles and the aunt Bosanquet in particular, but overall her cast was miles away from the wonderful characters of her Regency novels. But still, it was a really great book, and contrary to popular opinion, I would recommend it to cozy-mystery newbies, because chances are if you haven't really anything else to compare it to, you'll find it wonderful. It's well-written and well done, and although not held as Heyer's best mystery, I'd say start with this one and save the bests for last!
(Wow this is a short review, I have no idea how to review a mystery without spoiling anything!!)
Buddy-read with Tweety! :D
My very first Heyer mystery! This is cause for celebration! Also my first cozy-mystery in ages, and it's now got me hooked on the genre! More celebration!
I really, really enjoyed myself with Footsteps in the Dark. It was spooky, exciting, suspenseful, and just plain good fun! The mystery was rather easy to solve (it didn't take me long to figure out the villain's identity, and who was actually on the good side), but it still kept me on edge and turning the pages in excited anticipation to see how it would all unravel. I'm pretty sure that the eerie-creepy-mansion-full-of-ghosts-and-secret-passages plot has been done many a time, but since I'm a newbie to the genre, it was all new and intriguing to me. Plus, it's a Georgette Heyer novel, so you're guaranteed a few laughs and witty repartee along the way, just to make things ever more engaging!
I would have given it a solid 5 if it hadn't been for a few slow parts that I wish read through faster, the romance that felt a little too out of the blue, and the fact that the characters were no way near as well developed as I know Georgette Heyer can develop. They were a fun set and I loved Charles and the aunt Bosanquet in particular, but overall her cast was miles away from the wonderful characters of her Regency novels. But still, it was a really great book, and contrary to popular opinion, I would recommend it to cozy-mystery newbies, because chances are if you haven't really anything else to compare it to, you'll find it wonderful. It's well-written and well done, and although not held as Heyer's best mystery, I'd say start with this one and save the bests for last!
(Wow this is a short review, I have no idea how to review a mystery without spoiling anything!!)
Buddy-read with Tweety! :D
September 25, 2011
Vintage Scooby-Doo episodes, while fun to watch when you're bored and there's nothing else on TV, presented a lot of annoyances to me when I was younger. First there was that period where the episodes featured nonsensical guest stars (oh man, did anyone else see that episode where the gang solves a mystery with Batman and Robin?), and then there's the fact that these kids always seemed to have the exact wrong response when faced with a monster or ghost or whatever - an average-sized mummy or ghost or whatever jumps out at them, and they all run screaming. For god's sake, there are four of you and a large dog, just tackle the son of a bitch.
Also there's the fact that whenever the mystery concerned a haunting or a weird monster, the reason behind it was almost always that someone wanted to scare people off for one of three reasons: the land/property/whatever is really valuable but can be bought for cheap if the culprit convinces everyone that the place is haunted, the place is the headquarters for some criminal operation, or there's some kind of treasure that the culprit wants to hunt for without having to deal with meddling kids in his business. (I swear I'm going somewhere with all of this, just stay with me)
And the kids were, honestly, pretty fucking annoying. They had the stupidest quips, their plans for catching the culprit only ever worked because they failed spectacularly, and every single episode Fred would be like, "Let's split up, gang!" and then they waste the next fifteen minutes trying to find each other in the haunted amusement park after they got separated.
My point is, if you enjoy mystery stories about hauntings and amateur detective antics but find Scooby-Doo and Co. annoying as hell, I recommend picking up Georgette Heyer's Footsteps in the Dark as soon as possible. It's like Heyer's preemptive strike against Scooby-Doo and his associated nonsense - the mystery centers around a haunted house with a menacing, very physical ghost known as the Monk, our detectives are quippy (but actually clever) young people who blunder their way around the mystery but manage to be sensible about things (while still getting separated at one point, but still), and the reason behind the haunting is one of the three I listed above. Out of respect for spoilers I won't say which one, but will say that Heyer very cleverly has her characters discuss all those reasons as the possible explanation for the haunting, so we as the readers immediately dismiss them and start trying to come up with another explanation. It's very smart, and fooled me completely.
It must be said that I guessed the culprit about halfway through the book, as well as a couple big twists that get revealed at the end, but this didn't even bother me. The haunted house that Heyer has created is genuinely creepy, and the Monk (as well as the other goings-on in the house) is especially scary. Also the four main characters, as I mentioned, are cute and quippy and generally delightful, trading witty banter and clever allusions with an ease that would impress Lord Peter Wimsey. There's even a romance element to the mystery, and it was surprisingly well-done and not at all cloying, although it ends on such a ridiculous note that I can't fully support it.
All in all, a fun and creepy haunted house story that shows those meddling kids how it's really done. I will definitely be looking up more Heyer mysteries in the future.
Also there's the fact that whenever the mystery concerned a haunting or a weird monster, the reason behind it was almost always that someone wanted to scare people off for one of three reasons: the land/property/whatever is really valuable but can be bought for cheap if the culprit convinces everyone that the place is haunted, the place is the headquarters for some criminal operation, or there's some kind of treasure that the culprit wants to hunt for without having to deal with meddling kids in his business. (I swear I'm going somewhere with all of this, just stay with me)
And the kids were, honestly, pretty fucking annoying. They had the stupidest quips, their plans for catching the culprit only ever worked because they failed spectacularly, and every single episode Fred would be like, "Let's split up, gang!" and then they waste the next fifteen minutes trying to find each other in the haunted amusement park after they got separated.
My point is, if you enjoy mystery stories about hauntings and amateur detective antics but find Scooby-Doo and Co. annoying as hell, I recommend picking up Georgette Heyer's Footsteps in the Dark as soon as possible. It's like Heyer's preemptive strike against Scooby-Doo and his associated nonsense - the mystery centers around a haunted house with a menacing, very physical ghost known as the Monk, our detectives are quippy (but actually clever) young people who blunder their way around the mystery but manage to be sensible about things (while still getting separated at one point, but still), and the reason behind the haunting is one of the three I listed above. Out of respect for spoilers I won't say which one, but will say that Heyer very cleverly has her characters discuss all those reasons as the possible explanation for the haunting, so we as the readers immediately dismiss them and start trying to come up with another explanation. It's very smart, and fooled me completely.
It must be said that I guessed the culprit about halfway through the book, as well as a couple big twists that get revealed at the end, but this didn't even bother me. The haunted house that Heyer has created is genuinely creepy, and the Monk (as well as the other goings-on in the house) is especially scary. Also the four main characters, as I mentioned, are cute and quippy and generally delightful, trading witty banter and clever allusions with an ease that would impress Lord Peter Wimsey. There's even a romance element to the mystery, and it was surprisingly well-done and not at all cloying, although it ends on such a ridiculous note that I can't fully support it.
All in all, a fun and creepy haunted house story that shows those meddling kids how it's really done. I will definitely be looking up more Heyer mysteries in the future.
November 5, 2020
First published in 1932, this is Georgette Heyer's first mystery. Charles, his wife Celia and her siblings, Peter and Margaret, inherit a country house - The Priory - and go to stay there with their aunt, Mrs Bosanquet. The Priory is rumoured to be haunted by 'the Monk,' and the house, which lacks amenities, such as electricity, helps add to the atmosphere of spooky menace. As more and more people warn them off, both Charles and Peter suspect there is a reason for why someone wants them to stay away.
This is a fairly simple mystery. We have an odd cast of local characters, many of whom seem to spend their time traipsing through the ground of the Priory, a ghost who is all too apparent, priest holes with skeletons, hidden passageways, crypts and criminals. Although it is not the best plotted mystery, the characters are fun and, as always with Heyer, the dialogue adds humour and there is, of course, a little romance. Good fun and an enjoyable escape from a modern world which has become all too stressful recently!
This is a fairly simple mystery. We have an odd cast of local characters, many of whom seem to spend their time traipsing through the ground of the Priory, a ghost who is all too apparent, priest holes with skeletons, hidden passageways, crypts and criminals. Although it is not the best plotted mystery, the characters are fun and, as always with Heyer, the dialogue adds humour and there is, of course, a little romance. Good fun and an enjoyable escape from a modern world which has become all too stressful recently!
May 9, 2011
Pleasant if not hugely innovative mystery of the "hapless folk move into house with mysterious goings-on" set-up. In this case, sisters Celia and Margaret and their brother Peter inherit a large old home where they used to visit their aunt as children. They stay there on vacation, along with Celia's husband Charles and a widowed aunt (of the sensible rather than skittish variety). Villagers tell them ghost stories but they suspect human causes for the strange noises interrupting their holiday. Especially since everyone and his brother keeps wandering round their property at night. When the cliche country constable fails to discover anything they decide to investigate on their own...
Well, make that the men investigate. Celia is kind of a twit, and doesn't seem to have much in common with her independent and spunky siblings. Margaret could have been a really strong character except Heyer decided to make her fall in love and go all silly. This was one of the weakest points of the plot, that a sensible, happy adult woman would be so head over heels concerning a man she not only hardly knew but had every reason to be suspicious of. I just didn't believe she would have so much trust in Michael at this point, and really Heyer could have written it in such a way that she got to know him better and thus had some grounds for her devotion. Even an afternoon walk with intense conversation would have worked; a quick exchange of glances over a flat tire didn't do it for me.
For once I guessed the villain. Probably because there weren't that many characters! It wasn't that complex as mysteries go, but it was an amusing little read -- especially so soon after The Reluctant Widow, which is practically the same story only with an historical setting and slightly more romance.
Well, make that the men investigate. Celia is kind of a twit, and doesn't seem to have much in common with her independent and spunky siblings. Margaret could have been a really strong character except Heyer decided to make her fall in love and go all silly. This was one of the weakest points of the plot, that a sensible, happy adult woman would be so head over heels concerning a man she not only hardly knew but had every reason to be suspicious of. I just didn't believe she would have so much trust in Michael at this point, and really Heyer could have written it in such a way that she got to know him better and thus had some grounds for her devotion. Even an afternoon walk with intense conversation would have worked; a quick exchange of glances over a flat tire didn't do it for me.
For once I guessed the villain. Probably because there weren't that many characters! It wasn't that complex as mysteries go, but it was an amusing little read -- especially so soon after The Reluctant Widow, which is practically the same story only with an historical setting and slightly more romance.
March 4, 2015
Georgette Heyer suppressed some of her early books, presumably because she wasn't happy with them. These include Simon the Coldheart ( deadly dull) The Great Roxhythe (unintentionally very funny!) & her "contemporaries" (Helen was so terrible I feel no desire to seek out the other three!) I believe GH also suppressed this one for a time, so I approached this read with some trepidation. But I need not have worried. This book certainly isn't a masterpiece & some of the writing is very "jolly hockey sticks" http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dicti... but it is still an enjoyable romp, albeit with a lot of filler & a few plot holes, most notably & the romance was very poorly done.
Worth a read, but I read most Heyers multiple times. I'm unlikely to bother reading this one again.
Worth a read, but I read most Heyers multiple times. I'm unlikely to bother reading this one again.
January 16, 2016
3 1/2 Stars
I must say this was better than my last Heyer mystery!
The last, No Wind of Blame, was dull and yawnifying. (Yes, I just coined that). But this one was a great improvement. The characters were more interesting and a bit more happens. Nonetheless, it's still a bit slow and there were moments where I just wanted things to happen FASTER.
Peter, Margaret, Ceila and her husband Chas have inherited an old run down priory. They are enchanted with the idea that it has a history with a resident ghost, as all the villagers claim. The ghost is named, 'The Monk' and several people claim to have seen him walking the priory's grounds at night.
The four of them think nothing of it till one odd incident after another adds up, a falling picture, a priest's hole, bones, footsteps, groaning in the night and finally, someone creeping about their grounds at night. But, is it 'The Monk' or is there flesh and blood behind all of the spooks?
And if so, who is it? The mad artist? The small salesman? The dark man Margaret trusts completely called Strange? Or is it someone completely unexpected? What is the game? Why does someone want they to leave the priory?
I'll be frank, the plot sounds deliciously creepy and spine-tinglingly good. Throughout there's moments of creepiness and suspense, however it's not till the last fifth that I was really gripping the pages and getting excited and feeling throughly glad that I wasn't all by myself at home. And, if it had all been like that this would be five stars easy. The rest didn't quite do that for me though and so I'm going with what most of the book felt like, a three and a half.
This book has what all priory's should, pivoting walls, secret passageways and tunnels underground. Love that! I admit other books have held the suspense for a plot like this better (Enid Blyton's The Island of Adventure, anyone? I know it's a kids book, but still), and I think that with a bit more of the 'happenings' spread out it would have been better. Instead of every few chapters someone yet again sees something shadowy. Maybe more discovery of the mystery earlier on would have been better for me?
Anyway, I wouldn't say pick this up for your first Heyer, and maybe not for your first Heyer mystery. But if you like her works, pick it up and enjoy. And you might just love it. :)
Oh, as a side not, I really liked Margaret and her side story. She was my favorite character.
PG There's mention of 'ghosts' and ghost stories which aren't told and a seance which was more of a farce and didn't get anywhere. A few swears and nothing more.
Buddy Read with Anne, glad we could read it together! Buddy Reads help me read books that I might put off and not get round to for ages. :)
I must say this was better than my last Heyer mystery!
The last, No Wind of Blame, was dull and yawnifying. (Yes, I just coined that). But this one was a great improvement. The characters were more interesting and a bit more happens. Nonetheless, it's still a bit slow and there were moments where I just wanted things to happen FASTER.
Peter, Margaret, Ceila and her husband Chas have inherited an old run down priory. They are enchanted with the idea that it has a history with a resident ghost, as all the villagers claim. The ghost is named, 'The Monk' and several people claim to have seen him walking the priory's grounds at night.
The four of them think nothing of it till one odd incident after another adds up, a falling picture, a priest's hole, bones, footsteps, groaning in the night and finally, someone creeping about their grounds at night. But, is it 'The Monk' or is there flesh and blood behind all of the spooks?
And if so, who is it? The mad artist? The small salesman? The dark man Margaret trusts completely called Strange? Or is it someone completely unexpected? What is the game? Why does someone want they to leave the priory?
I'll be frank, the plot sounds deliciously creepy and spine-tinglingly good. Throughout there's moments of creepiness and suspense, however it's not till the last fifth that I was really gripping the pages and getting excited and feeling throughly glad that I wasn't all by myself at home. And, if it had all been like that this would be five stars easy. The rest didn't quite do that for me though and so I'm going with what most of the book felt like, a three and a half.
This book has what all priory's should, pivoting walls, secret passageways and tunnels underground. Love that! I admit other books have held the suspense for a plot like this better (Enid Blyton's The Island of Adventure, anyone? I know it's a kids book, but still), and I think that with a bit more of the 'happenings' spread out it would have been better. Instead of every few chapters someone yet again sees something shadowy. Maybe more discovery of the mystery earlier on would have been better for me?
Anyway, I wouldn't say pick this up for your first Heyer, and maybe not for your first Heyer mystery. But if you like her works, pick it up and enjoy. And you might just love it. :)
Oh, as a side not, I really liked Margaret and her side story. She was my favorite character.
PG There's mention of 'ghosts' and ghost stories which aren't told and a seance which was more of a farce and didn't get anywhere. A few swears and nothing more.
Buddy Read with Anne, glad we could read it together! Buddy Reads help me read books that I might put off and not get round to for ages. :)
March 1, 2016
I've been on a Georgette Heyer kick recently both rereading a few of her Regency Romances and also trying her murder mysteries for the first time. I enjoy how she brings her light, engaging tone, snappy dialogue, mayhem and romps, and quirky characters into her murder mysteries like she did her historical romance. I'm not sure exactly the time frame, but I think this one was 20's era.
The setting was English country house/village and centered around a family inheriting an old estate that was once an abbey that is thought to be haunted. Things happen and either it really is haunted or someone is working very hard to get them to leave. Suspicious characters roam the grounds, weird sounds are within, sightings of a creepy Monk and a icky skeleton, the ravings of a mad artist, and the warnings of a very sane innkeeper top it off. But the Fortescue clan remain and try their luck at solving the mystery.
I love this type of set up for a mystery- creepy house, weird happenings, and lots of characters and possibilities. There is a murder, but it happens around the midway point and was one of the odd occurrences. I enjoyed the family dynamics with the three Fortescue siblings- Celia, Peter, and Margaret, with Celia's husband Charles Malcolm and the Fortescue aunt, Lillian. They are good, sensible people though with a sense of humor who love the old abbey house and grounds and it was fun seeing them all play at amateur sleuths and suspecting half the neighborhood. There is a side of romance though its mild and only barely there much of the time.
It's not a strongly developed story as to setting and characters, but still a fun mystery romp for all that.
The setting was English country house/village and centered around a family inheriting an old estate that was once an abbey that is thought to be haunted. Things happen and either it really is haunted or someone is working very hard to get them to leave. Suspicious characters roam the grounds, weird sounds are within, sightings of a creepy Monk and a icky skeleton, the ravings of a mad artist, and the warnings of a very sane innkeeper top it off. But the Fortescue clan remain and try their luck at solving the mystery.
I love this type of set up for a mystery- creepy house, weird happenings, and lots of characters and possibilities. There is a murder, but it happens around the midway point and was one of the odd occurrences. I enjoyed the family dynamics with the three Fortescue siblings- Celia, Peter, and Margaret, with Celia's husband Charles Malcolm and the Fortescue aunt, Lillian. They are good, sensible people though with a sense of humor who love the old abbey house and grounds and it was fun seeing them all play at amateur sleuths and suspecting half the neighborhood. There is a side of romance though its mild and only barely there much of the time.
It's not a strongly developed story as to setting and characters, but still a fun mystery romp for all that.
July 14, 2011
This was the first of Heyer's mysteries and it shows. Heyer apparently did not want it to be re-published so it can be presumed that she wasn't that keen on it, or at least that she recognised its weaknesses. And weaknesses it has. There's little character development (not that too much character development is to be expected in such a novel), the crime is a bit unconvincing and the resolution a bit pat. However, it exhibits some of the classic Heyer strengths: strong dialogue (albeit not quite as witty as in later mysteries), a nice sense of place and time and a predictable but nevertheless sweet romance.
The four star rating I have given this novel has been determined somewhat idiosyncratically. Two stars are for the mystery itself. An extra one is due to the writing and the fourth because it is Heyer's first mystery and is therefore of some historical and literary significance to her fans. The net result is a novel I liked very much. A must for anyone who is interested in Heyer in particular and 1930s mystery novels in general. Possibly a miss for most other readers.
The four star rating I have given this novel has been determined somewhat idiosyncratically. Two stars are for the mystery itself. An extra one is due to the writing and the fourth because it is Heyer's first mystery and is therefore of some historical and literary significance to her fans. The net result is a novel I liked very much. A must for anyone who is interested in Heyer in particular and 1930s mystery novels in general. Possibly a miss for most other readers.
did-not-finish
August 13, 2014I am sorry to say I am giving up on this. I gave it a good go (185 pages) but I'm just not feeling it, basically, well, its torture. I know! Don't hate me! It may just be the mood I'm in (I am a firm believer in "last book dictates present mood" but it may just not be my style of writing. Cest la vie.
A side note: The print size is rather HUGE in these GH mysteries. A strange complaint probably but I find it very awkward reading larger type, it makes my eyes bug. I think if the font was smaller I would have made myself finish it. (My eyes like to "sweep in a paragraph" and large print makes me read line by line. That sounds weird, I know).
Anyway! Have no fear! I will try another GH (just not at the moment) because its probably fluke that I didn't like this one. So! Another day!
A side note: The print size is rather HUGE in these GH mysteries. A strange complaint probably but I find it very awkward reading larger type, it makes my eyes bug. I think if the font was smaller I would have made myself finish it. (My eyes like to "sweep in a paragraph" and large print makes me read line by line. That sounds weird, I know).
Anyway! Have no fear! I will try another GH (just not at the moment) because its probably fluke that I didn't like this one. So! Another day!
August 10, 2017
And now to the lighter side of a murder mystery ...
Some Bright Young Things inherit the Priory which has been sitting empty since their relative has died. After they move in, they hear from the villagers (and their butler) that the house is haunted by The Monk. It does not help that the house has spooky cellars and creaking stairs but no electricity or phone. Of course, none of them believe in ghosts - but the fun begins as they start to hear strange noises and see weird things in the dark and their aunt decides they must have a seance. Then, the very strange Michael Strange keeps popping up at unexpected times!
It reminded me of a Tommy and Tuppence story with a great secondary tier of characters including the bumbling village constable, the drunken French artist, the slimy carpet cleaner salesman and the trespassing moth collector.
Some Bright Young Things inherit the Priory which has been sitting empty since their relative has died. After they move in, they hear from the villagers (and their butler) that the house is haunted by The Monk. It does not help that the house has spooky cellars and creaking stairs but no electricity or phone. Of course, none of them believe in ghosts - but the fun begins as they start to hear strange noises and see weird things in the dark and their aunt decides they must have a seance. Then, the very strange Michael Strange keeps popping up at unexpected times!
It reminded me of a Tommy and Tuppence story with a great secondary tier of characters including the bumbling village constable, the drunken French artist, the slimy carpet cleaner salesman and the trespassing moth collector.
August 8, 2016
Bumping my 2.5 star rating up to 3 because it is Georgette Heyer.
Footsteps in the Dark was slow and boring at the beginning but picked up as the book went on. 3 siblings (Peter, Margaret, and Celia) inherit an old country house from a distant relation and, along with Celia's husband Charles and an old aunt, decide to take an extended vacation. However, soon their stay is interrupted by strange occurrences and weird noises...local lore says the place is haunted. Determined not to be scared away, the siblings set out to solve the mystery, but someone, or thing, is definitely trying to get rid of them.
This story has about the depth and difficulty of a Scooby Doo episode, or an old Nancy Drew book. It is pleasant but predictable. A passing knowledge of previous Heyer mysteries makes the plot even more calculable. I guessed the "character" of all the characters, including the main villain, very quickly and spent the rest of the book wishing it would speed up.
What saves the book from being utterly slow are the characters, particularly the three leading men. Peter was a little slow at first but he shows himself to be a sweet, strong brother. Charles is hilarious and I can't imagine why he would marry someone so unfunny as Celia. Margaret was okay but I prefer her love interest. The best female was Mrs. Bosanquet, the aunt, who is very no-nonsense.
All the characters resemble the usual Heyer-mold but since I usually read her Regency, I particularly enjoyed seeing them in a 'modern' setting.
In the end, I would say a fun mystery but not my favorite.
Footsteps in the Dark was slow and boring at the beginning but picked up as the book went on. 3 siblings (Peter, Margaret, and Celia) inherit an old country house from a distant relation and, along with Celia's husband Charles and an old aunt, decide to take an extended vacation. However, soon their stay is interrupted by strange occurrences and weird noises...local lore says the place is haunted. Determined not to be scared away, the siblings set out to solve the mystery, but someone, or thing, is definitely trying to get rid of them.
This story has about the depth and difficulty of a Scooby Doo episode, or an old Nancy Drew book. It is pleasant but predictable. A passing knowledge of previous Heyer mysteries makes the plot even more calculable. I guessed the "character" of all the characters, including the main villain, very quickly and spent the rest of the book wishing it would speed up.
What saves the book from being utterly slow are the characters, particularly the three leading men. Peter was a little slow at first but he shows himself to be a sweet, strong brother. Charles is hilarious and I can't imagine why he would marry someone so unfunny as Celia. Margaret was okay but I prefer her love interest. The best female was Mrs. Bosanquet, the aunt, who is very no-nonsense.
All the characters resemble the usual Heyer-mold but since I usually read her Regency, I particularly enjoyed seeing them in a 'modern' setting.
In the end, I would say a fun mystery but not my favorite.
December 24, 2016
Footsteps in the Dark was a fun mystery by Georgette Heyer.
Three siblings inherit an estate in the English countryside and they decide to spend their vacation there. The heirs, along with their spinster aunt and the husband of one of the women, arrive at the country house only to find out that it’s haunted. Of course, this is all taken to be a local legend…until things begin to go bump in the night, shadowy figures prowl the grounds in the evenings and there’s a murder.
It was an enjoyable read and moved at a good pace. Most of the clues were available to the reader but the connections were left to the reader to figure out. I plan to continue reading these Country House Mysteries as I find them quite entertaining and a good mystery.
Rating 4 Stars
Three siblings inherit an estate in the English countryside and they decide to spend their vacation there. The heirs, along with their spinster aunt and the husband of one of the women, arrive at the country house only to find out that it’s haunted. Of course, this is all taken to be a local legend…until things begin to go bump in the night, shadowy figures prowl the grounds in the evenings and there’s a murder.
It was an enjoyable read and moved at a good pace. Most of the clues were available to the reader but the connections were left to the reader to figure out. I plan to continue reading these Country House Mysteries as I find them quite entertaining and a good mystery.
Rating 4 Stars
January 6, 2015
More than a little silly, but a fun and mildly diverting read. Like Hannah, I kept harking back to my childhood favorite Nancy Drew and The Hidden Staircase I loved all the 1930 period details, the hidden passages and Gothic goings on, but the plot was clunky and the four main characters never really came alive for me. Nancy Drew would never have been as foolish as the Celia and Margaret!
I'm definitely planning to read more of Georgette Heyer's mysteries--this was her first and my expert GR friends say the later ones are better.
Group read with Georgette Heyer Fans for August.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I'm definitely planning to read more of Georgette Heyer's mysteries--this was her first and my expert GR friends say the later ones are better.
Group read with Georgette Heyer Fans for August.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
August 12, 2007
I allowed an early prejudice against Heyer's mysteries to prevent me from reading most of them at all, yet I found this very pleasant and entertaining. While the characters were not as well developed as those in her historical novels (and, indeed, seemed a bit cliched), the book compares favorably with some Ngaio Marsh and Patricia Wentworth titles.
October 21, 2022
A couple of years ago a Goodreads reading group introduced me to the mystery works of Georgette Heyer. After picking up a couple of her novels and enjoying them both, I decided to read more of them only for my focus to fade. Recently, however, I was able to acquire a bunch of them inexpensively, which gave me the opportunity to fulfill my earlier intention. Being the reader that I am, I decided to start with the earliest one, and as her first mystery novel was among those in my haul I began with it.
In her biography of Heyer, Jane Aiken Hodge notes that in her later years she asked her publishers not to reprint this book, as she felt it was an immature work. And after reading it, I understand completely why she felt this way. In it a trio of siblings — Cilia, Peter, and Margaret — inherit a dilapidated country house built around a former priory. Though the locals warn that the place is haunted by a ghostly figure named "the Monk," the three take up residence along with Celia's husband, Charles, and a couple who are employed as their servants. As they settle in, they soon discover that the house is a warren of priest-holes and hidden passages, while enigmatic characters randomly appear on the grounds. The unease generated by the ominous noises they hear and the discovery of a skeleton all seem to be geared towards a single purpose: to get the group to abandon the house to whatever party is generating them.
And herein lay my first problem with the novel. While Heyer works to create a sense of mystery about it, as other reviewers have noted the whole plot device of the Monk comes across as very Scooby-Doo-ish, as there's never any sense that what is happening is anything other than an exercise in intimidation by fear. That this takes up over half of the book made it feel like unnecessary padding that did little more than drag out the plot before the body inevitably turned up. I enjoyed more the investigation that followed, but again it was obvious from the start that the most likely suspect was not going to be the murderer, and it wasn't too difficult to work out who the culprit was before the ultimate reveal (which also brought back Scooby-Doo flashbacks). The whole thing isn't terrible, but when compared to her later works the rawness of this early effort is easy to see, as her later works build character and suspense much more effectively. In this respect it's a novel more likely to be enjoyed by Heyer completists and those interested in exploring how her style evolved than by those seeking a starting point for her detective novels, as it's only a reflection of the better books to follow.
In her biography of Heyer, Jane Aiken Hodge notes that in her later years she asked her publishers not to reprint this book, as she felt it was an immature work. And after reading it, I understand completely why she felt this way. In it a trio of siblings — Cilia, Peter, and Margaret — inherit a dilapidated country house built around a former priory. Though the locals warn that the place is haunted by a ghostly figure named "the Monk," the three take up residence along with Celia's husband, Charles, and a couple who are employed as their servants. As they settle in, they soon discover that the house is a warren of priest-holes and hidden passages, while enigmatic characters randomly appear on the grounds. The unease generated by the ominous noises they hear and the discovery of a skeleton all seem to be geared towards a single purpose: to get the group to abandon the house to whatever party is generating them.
And herein lay my first problem with the novel. While Heyer works to create a sense of mystery about it, as other reviewers have noted the whole plot device of the Monk comes across as very Scooby-Doo-ish, as there's never any sense that what is happening is anything other than an exercise in intimidation by fear. That this takes up over half of the book made it feel like unnecessary padding that did little more than drag out the plot before the body inevitably turned up. I enjoyed more the investigation that followed, but again it was obvious from the start that the most likely suspect was not going to be the murderer, and it wasn't too difficult to work out who the culprit was before the ultimate reveal (which also brought back Scooby-Doo flashbacks). The whole thing isn't terrible, but when compared to her later works the rawness of this early effort is easy to see, as her later works build character and suspense much more effectively. In this respect it's a novel more likely to be enjoyed by Heyer completists and those interested in exploring how her style evolved than by those seeking a starting point for her detective novels, as it's only a reflection of the better books to follow.
November 12, 2020
2020 reread: 3.5 stars down from 4, since I’ve read several more Heyer mysteries, and they are better then this early effort, but Heyer’s humor shines through, and this is still fun. I listened to the audiobook this time, and the narrator is not one of my favorites (although she has done many Heyer books). I forgot most of this plot, the bad guy is fairly obvious, as is the romance - but it’s still rather sweet. I found myself getting distracted, the book failing to hold my interest midway through, skipped ahead, sped up the audiobook to finish. Entertaining, but other books to get to...
2011 read: Not my favorite Heyer mystery, but lots of fun just the same. I'm an avid mystery fan (not much for "cozies", more a fan of the British and American Golden Age mysteries and historical mysteries), and was thrilled to discover Heyer's dry, witty, character-driven mysteries. I love her Regencies, as well, for her humor, brilliant characters and plotting, and dialogue. "Footprints in the Dark" had it all, I admit; haunted house, secret passages, questionable characters - but it took a while to get going for me. I felt like this was one of her first attempts at mystery, and I could tell, if you know what I mean; as a mystery buff, you're used to certain plot devices, character types, etc., and it's just a matter of how creatively the author uses them. The writer's level of mastery adds or detracts from my enjoyment accordingly - how much I as the reader "saw that coming". Anyway, because this was one of her first efforts, before the Inspectors Hemingway and Hannasyde mysteries, it felt more obvious in places; but for all that, Heyer's signature wit and style carried it through the slower bits until it really started hopping in the last quarter or so of the book. So, since Heyer's slowest-going effort is still better than 90% of what's available today for mystery fans, I'd still give this book four stars!
2011 read: Not my favorite Heyer mystery, but lots of fun just the same. I'm an avid mystery fan (not much for "cozies", more a fan of the British and American Golden Age mysteries and historical mysteries), and was thrilled to discover Heyer's dry, witty, character-driven mysteries. I love her Regencies, as well, for her humor, brilliant characters and plotting, and dialogue. "Footprints in the Dark" had it all, I admit; haunted house, secret passages, questionable characters - but it took a while to get going for me. I felt like this was one of her first attempts at mystery, and I could tell, if you know what I mean; as a mystery buff, you're used to certain plot devices, character types, etc., and it's just a matter of how creatively the author uses them. The writer's level of mastery adds or detracts from my enjoyment accordingly - how much I as the reader "saw that coming". Anyway, because this was one of her first efforts, before the Inspectors Hemingway and Hannasyde mysteries, it felt more obvious in places; but for all that, Heyer's signature wit and style carried it through the slower bits until it really started hopping in the last quarter or so of the book. So, since Heyer's slowest-going effort is still better than 90% of what's available today for mystery fans, I'd still give this book four stars!
September 22, 2013
You've read this book before — and more deftly executed. A married couple and the wife's brother and sister go on vacation (holiday in Britspeak) in a run-down pile out in the country with a reputation for being haunted. By Chapter 2, the husband, Charles Malcolm, and his intrepid brother-in-law, Peter Fortescue, have realized that the ghost is a ruse by an all-too-real adversary. When the police prove less than useless, the brothers-in-law begin sleuthing on their own.
Admittedly, I didn't figure out who the villain was until the end; however, most readers will be able to eliminate the prime suspect with one-third of the novel to go. As this novel was first published in 1932, I'll give Georgette Heyer some credit for coming up with the idea earlier rather than later. In other words, the books that you've read that more expertly handle this same plot probably took a page from Footsteps in the Dark; for that reason, I'll add an extra star.
Heyer's no Dame Agatha Christie, but some of her mysteries rise to four-star levels. The novel's not as abysmal as Behold, Here's Poison, but it certainly isn't in the same league as Heyer's much better The Unfinished Clue.
Admittedly, I didn't figure out who the villain was until the end; however, most readers will be able to eliminate the prime suspect with one-third of the novel to go. As this novel was first published in 1932, I'll give Georgette Heyer some credit for coming up with the idea earlier rather than later. In other words, the books that you've read that more expertly handle this same plot probably took a page from Footsteps in the Dark; for that reason, I'll add an extra star.
Heyer's no Dame Agatha Christie, but some of her mysteries rise to four-star levels. The novel's not as abysmal as Behold, Here's Poison, but it certainly isn't in the same league as Heyer's much better The Unfinished Clue.
January 30, 2020
So far I have enjoyed all of Georgette Heyer’s murder mystery novels, but this one has proved the exception. The murder feels as though it was shoehorned in as an afterthought over two thirds of the way through the narrative (perhaps a despairing editor’s suggestion?) and the mystery is risible. It scarcely rises above the level of a poor man’s adult Famous Five with Aunt Lilian as Timmy the dog. The siblings and minor characters are all well drawn and likeable but the exposition goes on far too long in establishing an implausible ghost narrative which is obviously a cover for criminal activity. The criminal gang does what criminal gangs do and there is a lame attempt at disguising the good / bad characters mixed with a couple of red herrings amongst the village dramatis personae. Naturally the criminals are apprehended and a romance blossoms, but all in all it is a weak effort.
November 10, 2020
A very good read! A little as if the Famous Five had grown up and been left a spooky old haunted country house.
Witty, well paced, filled with adventure, excitement and drama but not so much you don't enjoy the Bridge Games and Drinks Trays being bought in at 10pm prompt.
My favourite Heyer so far and from what I've read her least favourite mystery novel!
Witty, well paced, filled with adventure, excitement and drama but not so much you don't enjoy the Bridge Games and Drinks Trays being bought in at 10pm prompt.
My favourite Heyer so far and from what I've read her least favourite mystery novel!
August 11, 2014
On this reread (my 4th?), I have decided that this is really 3½ stars not 4 so I am downgrading it.
I still like this romantic suspense type mystery but the romance angle in this one is pretty slapdash. So surprising for a Heyer book too!
I still like this romantic suspense type mystery but the romance angle in this one is pretty slapdash. So surprising for a Heyer book too!
![Profile Image for Tina [kupfermuenze].](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.gr-assets.com%2Fimages%2FS%2Fcompressed.photo.goodreads.com%2Fusers%2F1735673938i%2F63316474._UY200_CR20%2C0%2C200%2C200_.jpg&w=128&q=75)
October 25, 2017
Nee. Nicht mein Buch...
Das Cover hat mich sehr angesprochen und auch die Inhaltsangabe verspricht Grusel. Doch leider hatte ich meine Probleme mit dem Schreibstil, den Charakteren und auch der fehlenden Spannung. Ein Gruselfaktor kam nur auf, wenn ich dieses Buch im dunkeln und in völliger Stille gelesen habe. Doch unter 'Gruselfaktor' ist da zu verstehen, dass mich meine Gedanken, und nicht das Buch gruselten.
Leider konnte mich das Buch nicht überzeugen und so vergebe ich hier 2 Sterne. Die Idee hinter der Story ist nämlich gar nicht so ungruselig. An der Umsetzung hat es leider gehapert..
Das Cover hat mich sehr angesprochen und auch die Inhaltsangabe verspricht Grusel. Doch leider hatte ich meine Probleme mit dem Schreibstil, den Charakteren und auch der fehlenden Spannung. Ein Gruselfaktor kam nur auf, wenn ich dieses Buch im dunkeln und in völliger Stille gelesen habe. Doch unter 'Gruselfaktor' ist da zu verstehen, dass mich meine Gedanken, und nicht das Buch gruselten.
Leider konnte mich das Buch nicht überzeugen und so vergebe ich hier 2 Sterne. Die Idee hinter der Story ist nämlich gar nicht so ungruselig. An der Umsetzung hat es leider gehapert..
March 6, 2024
3-1/2 Stars
I enjoyed this mystery which is more a ghost story/suspense novel than a murder mystery. I felt the middle was a little bit slow and maybe cutting out 50 pages or so would have made this a tighter story. But I enjoyed the gothic feel and found the characters all very entertaining. I did figure out who the bad guy was about halfway through so that may have played a part in why I felt the story dragged a bit.
I enjoyed this mystery which is more a ghost story/suspense novel than a murder mystery. I felt the middle was a little bit slow and maybe cutting out 50 pages or so would have made this a tighter story. But I enjoyed the gothic feel and found the characters all very entertaining. I did figure out who the bad guy was about halfway through so that may have played a part in why I felt the story dragged a bit.
November 13, 2024
A cozy English haunted house mystery.
July 9, 2017
A breezy quartet -- Celia Malcolm and her husband Charles, plus Celia's siblings Peter and Margaret Fortescue -- inherit a gloomy old pile some distance out of London, and decide to inhabit it with their elderly maiden aunt despite the lack of mod cons . . . and despite the ghost that the locals tell them haunts the place.
Cue creaks and groans, apparitions in the night. Things get mysteriouser and mysteriouser, and it's evident that some of those locals aren't exactly what they present themselves to the world to be. But our heroes persist, and eventually they prove that there's a rational explanation for all those uncanny happenings, a rational explanation that hinges on an international criminal plot!
Oo-er.
I found the first half of the book tiresome, with the bright young things exchanging witless, heavy-handed, often snobbish banter in all directions and a buffoonish local PC Plod for everyone to guffaw at, oh jeez. Although it still had definite pacing problems (there's an interminable chapter in which two characters try one possibility, and then another, and then another, and then . . . in their hunt for an explanation as to why two others have disappeared) and although it became far too bloody obvious far too bloody early on just who was the baddy and who the main mystery figure really was, the second half picked up quite a lot -- either that or I finally got more into the mood for the book.
I don't think I've ever managed to plow through -- or even so much as crack open -- one of Heyer's historical novels, all of which seem to be called Regency Buck, but I do recall reading, and being disappointed by, one of her detective novels decades ago . . . and, who knows, perhaps it was this one. Until I came here to write these notes I was more or less decided that this'd be an end to my experiments with Heyer's detections, but then I noticed a remark in GR-friend Bev Hankins's review of Footsteps in the Dark:
So I may -- pace Bev! -- give Penhallow a try sometime soon.
Cue creaks and groans, apparitions in the night. Things get mysteriouser and mysteriouser, and it's evident that some of those locals aren't exactly what they present themselves to the world to be. But our heroes persist, and eventually they prove that there's a rational explanation for all those uncanny happenings, a rational explanation that hinges on an international criminal plot!
Oo-er.
I found the first half of the book tiresome, with the bright young things exchanging witless, heavy-handed, often snobbish banter in all directions and a buffoonish local PC Plod for everyone to guffaw at, oh jeez. Although it still had definite pacing problems (there's an interminable chapter in which two characters try one possibility, and then another, and then another, and then . . . in their hunt for an explanation as to why two others have disappeared) and although it became far too bloody obvious far too bloody early on just who was the baddy and who the main mystery figure really was, the second half picked up quite a lot -- either that or I finally got more into the mood for the book.
I don't think I've ever managed to plow through -- or even so much as crack open -- one of Heyer's historical novels, all of which seem to be called Regency Buck, but I do recall reading, and being disappointed by, one of her detective novels decades ago . . . and, who knows, perhaps it was this one. Until I came here to write these notes I was more or less decided that this'd be an end to my experiments with Heyer's detections, but then I noticed a remark in GR-friend Bev Hankins's review of Footsteps in the Dark:
"Footsteps in the Dark is a very welcome return to Georgette Heyer's usual breezy, comic mystery style--far removed from the dark and brooding Penhallow which I just recently finished."
So I may -- pace Bev! -- give Penhallow a try sometime soon.
November 3, 2024
I have a lot of fondness for this book. It's the first of Heyer's mysteries that I read back when I was a newlywed haunting used book stores. I wasn't a fan of the author then, as I'd only read a couple of her romances, and those not her best. But I fell in love with this book and I still really enjoy revisiting it.
I liked the interactions between our 4 MCs, their fond, amusing aunt, and the general setting of an old country house. Sardonic Charles was a delight, but I especially liked Margaret, capable and matter-of-fact, and Michael Strange, a quiet man who lived up to his name. There's a touch of gothic to this novel, with ghosts and moonlight walks, hidden passages and warnings of danger. But just a touch, which pleased me as I'm not a fan of gothics. Mystery wise it's not hard to figure out, but there are enough possibilities to keep you wondering exactly who is up to what. Heyer is know for her characterizations, but this book has enough action to please many mystery readers, too.
NB - I've listened to the audio book, and while it's adequate I wouldn't necessarily recommend it. For some reason I think the book seems to drag when I listen, but I don't find that true when I read it.
NB - Upon reading this during Covid lock down month 10 - I still love this book! I had to laugh when the ardent young lover finally has his girl in his arms and he calls her "spunky" and "a good sport". LOL It's just so fun, taking me back to childhood days reading Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
I liked the interactions between our 4 MCs, their fond, amusing aunt, and the general setting of an old country house. Sardonic Charles was a delight, but I especially liked Margaret, capable and matter-of-fact, and Michael Strange, a quiet man who lived up to his name. There's a touch of gothic to this novel, with ghosts and moonlight walks, hidden passages and warnings of danger. But just a touch, which pleased me as I'm not a fan of gothics. Mystery wise it's not hard to figure out, but there are enough possibilities to keep you wondering exactly who is up to what. Heyer is know for her characterizations, but this book has enough action to please many mystery readers, too.
NB - I've listened to the audio book, and while it's adequate I wouldn't necessarily recommend it. For some reason I think the book seems to drag when I listen, but I don't find that true when I read it.
NB - Upon reading this during Covid lock down month 10 - I still love this book! I had to laugh when the ardent young lover finally has his girl in his arms and he calls her "spunky" and "a good sport". LOL It's just so fun, taking me back to childhood days reading Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
January 26, 2015
What a great crime novel! I am a long-standing Georgette Heyer fan. I love her books. Her stories were always so incredibly well drawn, her characters unforgettable. She is one of the very few authors with many, many books in one genre who didn't have "types" in the sense of recurring schemes or personalities.
And this classic and clean crime novel is no exception.
The dialogues and the cheerful sense of humor made it very entertaining.
The characters were drawn through their actions, their speeches and their little mannerisms.
And this classic and clean crime novel is no exception.
The dialogues and the cheerful sense of humor made it very entertaining.
The characters were drawn through their actions, their speeches and their little mannerisms.
April 13, 2019
A cross between a very Christie-esque setting and Blyton-ish adventure, this book will certainly keep you hooked. A quick read with fast moving story that will not bore you at any instant. However, events were very predictable (especially for seasoned mystery afficionados) and so was the big reveal. But, it certainly kept me entertained throughout with the quaint British setting, secret passages, small town charm and the spooky elements. Recommended for light reading coupled with some amount of thinking.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 816 reviews