This book has more conjuring in it than all of J.K. Rowling's seven Harry Potter novels put together. One has to question the credibility of an author, and the publishing house, that would publish a book chock full of inaccuracies. I got so tired of listing everything that was wrong with this book because (A) there was so much of it and (B) it was hindering my reading because I constantly had to stop and make a note for my review. The only good part of this book was the last Chapter where the "author" states that Rowling said in order to write a book, one has to actually sit down and write it, and write what you know; unfortunately, as great as an advice that is, it's nothing that any other author hasn't said before and an advice that Marc Shapiro should have also taken. How can you take anything he wrote about Rowling seriously when he didn't even get her birth year right? It's a shame this was passed off as a legitimate "novel" (I mean, seriously the guy is making money off of this! You should be ashamed of yourself for ripping people off) because it's more like a high school book report than a real novel, whose "information" seemed to have been copied and pasted from the internet (which Mr. Shapiro basically admitted in the preface of the book); but another disturbing part of this book is that the "author" also conveniently failed to cite which information came from what source. Isn't that called plagiarism?
With so many glaring mistakes, one has to wonder whether Mr. Shapiro has actually ever read a single Harry Potter book and/or call to question his ability to research a subject, any subject. Here's the list of mistakes I found and I'm just your every day Harry Potter fan:
- On page xii,
o Mr.Shapiro states: “learning the fine arts of charms, spells, and magic, alongside good friends Ron and Hermione, at the feet of Professor Dumbledore.”; when in fact, by the time Harry, Ron and Hermione attend Hogwarts, Professor Dumbledore was already the headmaster of the school. In “Chamber of Secrets”, Tom Riddle’s diary shows that Professor Dumbledore taught “Transfiguration” when Tom was still attending Hogwarts, which was more than forty years prior the trio attending the school. Although, I suppose, one can argue that Professor Dumbledore “taught” Harry, Ron and Hermione valuable life lessons. Ok, I’ll give Mr. Shapiro that one.
- On page 5:
o Mr.Shapiro mentions that “the portraits of long-dead ancestors who come alive at night to primp and curl their hair.” During the Edinburgh Book Festival on August 15, 2004, Rowling explained that the portraits were enchanted imprints left behind by the subject of the portrait and are only capable of very limited interaction. Mostly, they would repeat catchphrases they were known to have said when they were alive. So in essence, once a spell was cast on the portraits, they become animated from that point on and could interact with the living all the time, not just at night.
o Mr.Shapiro mistakenly states, “…the moment when Harry discovers Cho Chan on the Quidditch field”. Cho’s last name is “Chang” (with a “g”), not “Chan” like the martial-arts actor, Jackie or the fictional Chinese-American detective, Charlie. Maybe that was a typo, but judging from the kerning, I would venture to say this was a serious oversight of facts by the writer, and who ever proofread this book.
- On page 7:
o Perhaps the most erroneous statement Mr.Shapiro makes in this book was that, “In the world of Harry Potter, owls run banks”. WRONG! (“Owl Post”-- it’s even the title of the first chapter in “Prisoner of Azkaban” for goodness sake!) Owls deliver the post, goblins runs the banks. Ok, this one can’t be attributed to being a typo, but the person charged with the task of checking out the facts for this book seriously needs to think about a career change.
o Mr.Shapiro also states, “But finally it is Harry Potter, a skinny thirteen-year-old with glasses, green eyes, and a head of unruly black hair who is the heart of J.K. Rowling’s adventures”. Thirteen? Sure, by the third book! But if you want to get technical about it, in the Sorcerer’s Stone, the first time we meet Harry, he was only a year old. By the time we are introduced to a spectacled Harry Potter, “nearly ten years has passed” (according to the opening sentence in chapter two), that would make the glasses-wearing Harry Potter eleven-years-old.
- On page 17:
o Mr.Shapiro states, “Rowling’s parents met on a train in 1963”. Her parents met in 1964.
o Mr.Shapiro wrote, “Ann worked as a lab technician”. J.K.’s mother’s name is misspelled. It’s Anne (with an “e”) and not Ann.
-On page 19:
o The author lists J.K. Rowling’s birth date as, “July 31, 1966”; when in fact, her birth year was 1965.
- On page 22:
o Mr.Shapiro refers to J.K. sister as “Di” all throughout the book. The younger sister’s name is “Dianne”. Close but still...
- On page 29:
o Mr.Shapiro wrote on page 17 that J.K.’s father was a manager of an aircraft factory, but then states on page 29 that “Peter moved up in his job as a mechanic for an automobile factory”. But according to the September 2012 issue of The New Yorker, Mr. Rowling was a Rolls-Royce aircraft engineer. I’m pretty sure “mechanic” ≠ “engineer”.
- On page 35:
o Mr.Shapiro states that “Joanne successfully graduated from Tutshill Primary”. J.K. attended St. Michael's Primary School.
- On page 49:
o Mr.Shapiro incorrectly wrote, “…the train stopped at Knight’s Cross station in London”. Knight’s Cross station does not exist. King’s Cross station, however, does.
- On page 74:
o Mr.Shapiro claims that “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was completed early in 1994”. Actually the manuscript wasn’t completed until 1995.
o Mr.Shapiro also writes that J.K. received a grant in 1994, after which she started teaching at the Moray House Training College. However, J.K. started teaching at Moray House in 1995 and did not receive the grant until 1997.
- On page 96:
o Mr. Shapiro stated that the fourth book's title was Harry Potter and the Doomspell Tournament. Any one else familiar with that one?