A surprisingly disappointing sequel. The first book was hit and miss, but was interesting enough to keep me going. This book, though.... Reynolds has a knack for finding the least interesting plot development, making that the center of the narrative for an interminably long stretch, and then following that by having a character show up to give the protagonist a detailed, after-the-fact account of events happening elsewhere that would have made a much more engaging focus for the story. This happens more than once in On the Steel Breeze, and it left me wondering if this book might have been the author's first, rather than his tenth or eleventh.
This is a real shame, because the Akinya family still has a lot of potential. But the series is consistently undermined not only by the problem mentioned above, but also by an excess of supporting characters having little purpose, constant repetition of the same limited information, and (by the end of the book) a moral incoherence that makes characters' reactions to plot developments seem completely bizarre and implausible. Yet as harsh as I might sound, I feel more disappointed than dismissive, because Reynolds does seem to be a talented writer in many respects. Enough so to make me think the flaws of this book should have been entirely avoidable.
*SPOILER WARNING*
Some glaring examples:
1) Both Pedro and Noah are given very limited skills by comparison with the Akinyas, with the result that neither of them has much purpose in the story beyond dying at convenient moments. And for this very reason, neither death really has the impact I suspect it was intended to have.
2) The Tantors are a great concept that gets incredibly short-shrift. We meet a few members of one generation almost in passing, and then later their descendant, Dakota, who we are told is tremendously significant without being given actual evidence to justify the claim. Much more could have been done with them here, especially given the bloat elsewhere in this overlong novel.
3) Why exactly was Chiku Red necessary? What vital part did she play that couldn't have been handled by someone else or simply left out entirely?
4) Given the number of pages devoted to the visits to Venus and to the Akinya estate, they both felt, in the end, much less important to the novel than they could have been. Neither was much more than an excuse for a very contrived action sequence that added little to the story (including Pedro's death for the reason given above).
5) The providers are untrustworthy. I got it the first time. Was it necessary to kill so many trees in making this point again and again?
6) Arachne kills millions of human beings in three holoships, but Chiku's primary concern is with the colonies of elephants on the other two ships. And in the discussion that follows, the death of so many people is dealt with by the characters in a manner that is, at best, perfunctory, while they explain away Chiku's complicity in a staggering crime as a simple matter of being a little too rushed to think things through. I think even Peter Singer would find this moral framing perverse, if not outright monstrous.
7) Given the vast (and unconvincing) power wielded by Arachne, Eunice felt utterly insignificant and inconsequential. When she (with the Tantors!) finally gets an opportunity to step forward and influence the future of Zanzibar, we see nothing of the dramatic events which ensue. Instead the narrative devotes page after page to Chiku doing effectively nothing--and then gives us a dull account after the fact of what could have been an exciting political confrontation played out across a massive holoship.
* SPOILERS END*
I put this book down with the same nagging feeling I had with Blue Remembered Earth. There are things here to like, and evidence of real talent, but all the potential promised by On the Steel Breeze is undermined by inexplicable authorial choices. I wish I had some reason to try book three, but there's just not enough here to justify it.