I honestly can't believe how many 4 and 5 star reviews this book has gotten so far.
I've read nearly everything that Connelly has written, and read most of them in very quick succession. I hate to be one of those internet extremists who either ABSOLUTELY LOVES something, or declares it THE WORST THING EVER, but... yeah. This is about the worst book Connelly has ever written.
First, it seems rather obvious that Connelly wanted a Mickey Haller novel out around the same time as the big screen version of THE LINCOLN LAWYER, whether he had a compelling story or not. He even makes a lame reference to Matthew McConaughey at one point. Hilarious.
Second, Connelly's big sin here is really taking an interesting and topical subject (the economic and foreclosure crisis of 2009-2011), and failing to do anything really INTERESTING with it. Connelly himself has published some opinion pieces over the years with a conservative bent, so I was actually surprised that his explanation of the mortgage meltdown pointed some fingers are the big banks and Wall Street. Of course, a few lines later, he made sure we understood that MOST of the fault was with the people who took out loans they couldn't afford. Sigh. I'd hope anyone looking for information on what REALLY happened has read or will read Michael Lewis's EXCELLENT book THE BIG SHORT. I wish Connelly had. You could argue that it isn't really his job to do an in-depth novel looking at the vagaries of the corporate world, and that his readers aren't expecting him to do so. I agree, to an extent, but to simply use it as a plot device here seemed somehow cheap to me.
Third, the repetition of certain elements throughout the book became unbearable. How many times does Haller turn around and yell at someone because they missed evidence or failed to uncover something? At least three or four it seemed. How many times do we have people using first names during dialog? Seriously, I know that some people might become "confused" when more than three people are talking to each other, but do we really need "hey, Jennifer," "that's a good point, Jennifer," why don't you take it, Jennifer?" all within the same PAGE? Who talks like that? The courtroom scenes are also devoid of any tension of flow because the prosecutor objects and sidebars to every second or third line out of Haller's mouth. Might be realistic, I suppose, but it reads incredibly poorly in practice.
Fourth, I couldn't stand the way Connelly chose to structure this book. He gives us a dippy liberal (ex-teacher, of course) who seems too smarmy at first glance, but seems completely innocent. He spends the entire novel showing how this is true, finding all kinds of outside evidence, presenting the evidence, getting us on HER (and Haller's) side, and then OF COURSE revealing in the last few pages how we've all been duped and she had done it all along. The truly stupid thing is that she really SHOULDN'T have killed this guy, based on everything that we were told in the previous 90% of the novel. It made little sense, but I guess that's why Connelly made her have also murdered her husband-- she didn't NEED a reason to do it, she's just crazy! Duh! I'm not one that usually guesses the outcome of mystery stories early, but I *knew* that this twist was coming; Connelly made such a big deal about how Haller believed in her innocence that you just knew it was going to play out the way it did.
Fifth, I also couldn't believe the way Connelly chose to end the book, and his obviously skewed beliefs that defense attorneys are somehow evil and unnecessary to our judicial process. Yes, Mickey Haller has always been presented as something of a scumball, and he's always made grumblings about how defense attorneys are needed but hated, etc., etc., but here we have a man who announces at the end of the book that he's decided to run for the D. A.'s office because he can't stand "hanging around with those types of people any more." Really? There's no place in the world for a crusading defense lawyer? NONE of the people who are put in front of the courts ARE innocent? The government never abuses its power? Wow. I guess we have come an awfully long way from the days of Atticus Finch and Perry Mason. In this day and age where it seems our elected officials and our corporate "masters" are using the courts to their advantages, it sure seems like we could use a guy who stood up for the underdog. I guess we're past that these days.
Lastly, there's a rather disturbing strain of misogyny that runs through this book. Aside from Haller himself, nearly all of the other characters in the book are female, and nearly all of them come out looking like fools, bitches, or harpies. Not sure who broke this man's heart, but I hope he can seek help for these issues he seems to be having.
---
It really does kind of pain me to dislike this book so much, as I've enjoyed many of Connelly's previous works. Here's hoping the next Bosch book can redeem him for me.