Harry Truman, of Independence Missouri, was the last president to serve with no college degree. Instead he joined the army and served in WWI where he discovered he was a leader of men. He once said, “my whole political career…is based on my war service and war associates.” (pg. 57) . Upon returning home he discovered he had a political base to run for county office. From there he progressed in elected offices until he reached the presidency when FDR passed away and as vice-president assumed the responsibility of the presidency. He led the country through very difficult times - the ending of WWII, the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, the start of the Cold War, and the Korean War.
He and FDR were a complete dichotomy as personalities go. This combined with the inherent challenges an unelected president has historically faced created real obstacles for Truman. The nation was accustomed to the charismatic, articulate, and often flamboyant Roosevelt. Instantly they inherited a reserved, ineloquent, humble, but decisive Truman. While popular until the end of WWII, Truman had a serious fight for his political life on his hand in securing the nomination in '48 and eventually the election where fewer than half of the eligible voters voted for either he or Dewey leading to the famous headlines miscalling the election.
I think the biggest surprise for me was learning about the personality of Truman. That often gets lost, I think, because of the larger historical events with which he was managing. Someone observed, "“he had a tenacious ability to focus on a problem and make a decision, served him well in his decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan" that attribute comes across throughout Ferrell's work. He is also portrayed as a man not afraid to "reach across the aisle." - I was surprised that Truman turned to Hoover for assistance on two tasks – surveying the world food supply, which Hoover had a great deal of experience in during WWII and reorganizing the executive branch. On the one hand many had anticipated Hoover running as a Democrat and Truman apparently had a great deal of respect for Hoover early in his career. On the other hand, Hoover’s reputation was so traumatized during the Great Recession it would seem anathema to bring him into an administration’s circle especially since he ended up on the Republican ticket. Also, sought input from two Republican presidential candidates who were unsuccessful – Dewey and Alf Landon. This is certainly a contrast to the environment we see today.
While the book was informative, I found it incredibly lacking. I was excited to dig into Truman because this is the intersection of three areas of history in which I do so much reading: presidential history, WWII, and Middle East. Ferrell is wholly lacking in analysis in this work with respect to actions immediately after WWII which sets up everything from WWII to where we are in the Middle East today. In fact, he simply puts forth that nothing else could have been done. While it is certainly possible that Truman's course of action may have been the best of very difficult circumstances (a view I will readily admit is not my own in a couple of areas, but would agree in others) for a historian to take that blase without a little exploration is incredibly disappointing.