Basically a sitcom. Whilst some of the inaccurate clichés of Regency and general historical settings didn't seem as deliberately and cleverly used as in Blackadder III, I have to say I found it almost as much fun as an episode of that. I liked the way it also pulls in an Elizabeth Gaskell style social reform subplot from later in the 19th century. Though for all I know this might be quite common in serious examples of genre Regency romance - I don't think I could bear a genre romance novel that took itself much more seriously, and this affectionate semi-satire seems much preferable to me. (Just as I thought about Northanger Abbey and gothic novels when I first read that.)
For a romance category in a reading challenge, I had concluded, seeing I wouldn't have time for a long classic, that I would go to a library and get one of the first really short ones published before 2000 that looked halfway bearable. I was resigned to getting a Mills and Boon and hoped I would be able to tolerate it better than I can tolerate certain genres of slow slushy songs that have been known to make me walk out of shops when they are played. Then I noticed a shelf of books by MC Beaton, whose Agatha Raisin books seem fairly inescapable in UK bookshops. I could tick off an author I'd actually heard of as well ... and these sounded silly and funny compared with the M&Bs. This one sounded the most fun of the lot, and it didn't escape my notice that that may have been because the blurb is mostly about class and social comedy with the heroine's parents, rather than the romance itself.
There is an serious amount of Regency terminology here, going well beyond what is found in the online glossaries that top search results, or what I learned from reading Austen - sometimes the frequency of its use felt like part of the satire, whether it was meant as such or not. There are moments when it seems like there is lots of attention to such detail, whilst certain parts of the bigger social-history picture are skew-wiff. Beaton's repeated misunderstanding of life expectancy stats grated a bit - but in the 80s, when she was writing these, access to and critique of historical material was far more limited than now, when everything's online. She evidently used life expectancy from birth stats, rather than the more relevant ones showing that once you reached adulthood you had a good chance of reaching middle age. It seems absurd to suggest that there were so few 50+ women in London high society that the fiftysomething matchmaker sisters who frame this series would not understand menopause symptoms as a common experience at that age. However, there *are* very few historical sources on women's experiences of that, so she still indirectly makes a good point. (But, whilst including this in a romance novel is probably refreshing for many readers, as I am, in 2021, tired of how the media can't shut up about menopause, because it makes it harder to think positively about the future as a woman in my early 40s. So I didn't like having to read about it repeatedly here. I am training myself not to click on headlines, and I have unsubscribed from a few companies' emails, but I have never been one of these people who skips pages in books, never mind ones that are under 200 pages and are as easy to read as a novel for older children.)
These days, I can't imagine the ambiguity of Mr Haddon and Mr Randolph - are they or are they not gay, and it's not even directly talked about - being in a new novel, as it's evident in articles & reviews on new romance fiction that one has to do representation clearly. On one hand, the way it is here seems more appropriate to the past, at least to the later 19th and early 20th century - but on the other, the Tribbles are worldly enough, and also grounded in more liberal 18th century mores, that it makes them, or possibly the author, look foolish that they don't consider it.
Despite this handful of quibbles, this was great fun overall, and I would consider reading another of Beaton's comedy historical romances at some point.