In the summer of 1759, a 24-year-old John Adams accompanied his friend Richard Cranch on a visit to the Smith household in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Cranch was there to visit the family’s eldest daughter Mary, to whom he was engaged. Adams was unimpressed with his friend’s future in-laws, writing disparagingly of his host, the Reverend William Smith, and dismissing the reverend’s three daughters as possessing neither the “fondness, nor this Tenderness” that he discerned in Hannah Quincy, the attractive young women whom he was attempting to woo at that time.
Five years later, Adams returned to that same house to be wed to Mary’s sister, Abigail. Their marriage would endure for over half a century, during which time Adams went from being a rising member of the Massachusetts colonial bar to a member of the Continental Congress, a diplomat for the rebellious states, the first vice president of the United States and George Washington’s successor as president. At every step in his ascent Abigail supported her husband and became his closest and most trusted advisor, all while raising their large family and maintaining their strained finances. Through both her example and her advocacy, as Charles Akers details in his concise account of her life, Adams was not just making her husband’s career possible, she was also seeking to define the role women could play in the new republic, one that she hoped could give greater scope to their capabilities than many of her contemporaries believed possible.
Abigail Adams’s achievements were all the more remarkable given the lack of opportunities available to her. Though raised in a household of bright, literate people, the young Abigail never received a formal education. As Akers makes clear, this made their choice of husbands vital, especially as marriage involved a sacrifice of autonomy and a subordination of interests. Here Abigail proved especially fortunate in her marriage to John, who was not only a man of ability but one who appreciated her formidable intellectual capabilities. Upon their marriage, they settled into the life of a young couple, with Abigail keeping house and raising their growing brood while John managed a thriving legal practice that often took him on the road.
Any hopes for a quiet life were soon disrupted by events. Living in Massachusetts put the Adamses at the heart of the growing tensions between the colony and their mother country. With John at the forefront of colonial activism, Abigail was left to tend to the family. Yet the letters they exchanged frequently – an invaluable resource of which Akers takes full advantage – gave her not just a front-row seat to the formation of the republic, but an opportunity to influence events available to few others. Akers sees through their correspondence a shared mind emerging over time between the two, one that gave Abigail a voice in events through her husband while simultaneously making her John’s most fervent partisan, and one uniquely well-informed to comment on events in her correspondence with others.
These letters, however were a poor substitute for John’s absence, which required Abigail to manage the full range of their family’s affairs while John was away serving the new nation, first in Congress, then abroad. It was not until John was selected as minister to France after independence was granted that Abigail was able to join him in Europe. As the wife of America’s representative to the courts of first Louis XVI, then George III, Abigail sought to define republican womanhood among the titled elites of Europe, an effort in which she especial pride in doing given the limited finances available to her. After four years abroad, the two of them returned home to public acclaim and an opportunity to occupy the second highest office of the land, putting her once more at the heart of her nation’s affairs.
Despite health problems that often kept her at their home in Quincy, over the next twelve years, Abigail Adams became intimately associated with national politics. With John in New York and Philadelphia, much of this was again through the steady stream of letters flowing between the two of them. Abigail’s influence peaked with her husband’s election as president in 1796, which catapulted her to the status of First Lady of the United States. Over the four years that followed, she set a distinctly different example from that of her predecessor, Martha, as she played an active (though still limited) role politically as well as socially. Akers even goes so far as to argue that her husband’s decision for a second term was based primarily upon her enjoyment of her role, only for his hopes for reelection thwarted by Federalist infighting and the nation’s turn towards the Democratic Republicans.
Perhaps surprisingly, Abigail held little bitterness towards Thomas Jefferson, possibly because of the longstanding friendship between the two of them. Her reconciliation with her husband’s political opponent and successor preceded John’s and likely paved the way for the subsequent renewal of the friendship between the two men. As such, it was just another example of the subtle yet significant legacy that Akers describes in his book. The range of her activities and the wealth of sources available in her correspondence is such that his coverage of her life at times can only provide a cursory coverage of her ideas and activities. Because of this his book serves best as an introduction to his fascinating subject, one that delineates the parameters of her many achievements and their enduring imprint upon our country.