“Did it ever occur to you that maybe some of these people prefer the illusion?”
Poor Ted Barton! When, on his way back home from a holiday with his wife Peg, he decides to pay a spontaneous visit to his old hometown Millgate, a secluded little place in the mountains, he finds the whole town strangely altered. Anyone who has yielded to the foolish impulse of re-visiting a childhood place will share this experience, but in Barton’s case, there is more to it than just the unacknowledged reluctance to coming to terms with the realization that the scenery of your childhood is no longer the same – and that it equals yourself in that respect. No, in Barton’s case, there are larger powers at work than just the course of ordinary events for he finds that nothing in that place is “right”, neither the houses, nor the names of the streets, nor the people themselves. All these things have not simply changed, but in fact seem never to have been at all! He even finds that a compass he carries in his trouser-pocket, a keepsake from his childhood, has turned into a piece of stale bread. While his wife Peg somehow does not seem to care a fig about these time inconsistencies – she is quite fed up with Ted’s enthusiasm about his childhood memories, anyway –, Ted himself cannot choose to overlook this puzzle. He wants to find out what is at the bottom of the Millgate mystery, even if this means risking the break-up of his marriage and, less unsettling, confronting primeval powers of darkness.
Dick’s early novel The Cosmic Puppets was published in 1957 and it immediately plunges the reader right into the action – interestingly through a device that the outstanding director Sam Peckinpah would use at the beginning of one of his most famous western movies: Similarly to the children in The Wild Bunch, whose gruesome play with a scorpion and a colony of ants mirrors the tragic conflict of the film, a couple of children in The Cosmic Puppets are sitting in front of a porch and competing with each other moulding little figures of clay. We will see that the motif of creation that is hinted at in this little scene will be of quite some importance later on, especially when we are going to be led into a discussion on what it takes for a reality to be regarded as “real”. Ted Barton might feel that he is moving through a fake town with fake people in it, but to these people their lives are perfectly real and valid, and it would never for a moment occur to them that their existence has effaced some reality with an older right. In his quest to get the old town back Ted even comes across a man who actually knows that the reality of which he is part is not the original one but who, for all his moral qualms and scruples, simply does not want to part with the life he is living in this fake reality. Who knows, he says, what my role in “real” reality is?
What reads like the script for an intriguing episode of The Twilight Zone – I have not even mentioned the mysterious Wanderers, transparent beings who walk about town with their eyes pressed close and whose existence is no matter of wonder to the town-dwellers – will eventually adopt another, less interesting twist to me, which I would not like to divulge here. Let’s just say that I found it out of place, not without logic holes and detracting from the original mystery that was built up.
I must say that I quite sympathized with Ted from the very start because I was entirely able to share his concern about preserving the El Dorado of his memories. Whenever I happen to find myself in my childhood village, I get on my wife’s nerves by saying things like, “There used to be a cherry-tree in that garden, which we used to climb as children. It’s not there, anymore.” The latter sentence has to be pronounced with indignation that implies that all other changes that have occurred in the past forty years are at least equally disgusting. Then there is my classic “There used to be wonderful half-timbered farmhouse on the site of that filling-station”, which I sometimes vary with the introductory “Have I ever told you that …” or with a question such as “Do you know what used to be on that site instead of that bloody filling-station?” More recently, I have made my son my new audience instead of my wife because I fear his wrath far less than I do hers … So, what I want to say is that in a way, I can fully understand Ted Barton, but at the same time I have to wonder at the exactness with which he seems to be able to summon up to memory every single little detail of his childhood town. Maybe, after all, this guy is simply not willing to really grow up and leave behind him “the fields where joy forever dwells”? After all, would it not be natural to assume that at least some changes must have taken place in a period of 18 years? And maybe, with him it is also a way of escaping from his dysfunctional marriage because there seems to be not much sympathy lost between him and his wife.
As I have already said, however, the novel only really intrigued me until its solution began to emerge from the shades of mystery – a solution which fell flat for me. Dick even spoilt it a bit more with his ending: While the beginning of the novel reminded me of one of the finest movies ever, its ending called to mind one of the ribaldries of The Naked Gun. That’s quite an elevator ride – into the wrong direction.