Nica de Koenigswarter is a legendary figure in the jazz world. Known as "The Jazz Baroness," she left her wealthy family (she's a Rothschild) and her wealthy husband (who was a baron) to live among jazz musicians in New York City. This book, written by (I believe) her great niece, is a nice overview of her life and times. It contained plenty of great anecdotes and had an interesting history of the Rothschild family.
To give a little overview, Nica de Koenigswarter grew up in a giant mansion as a member of the Rothschild family. She lived a pretty shut up, highly controlled life. She eventually married a baron and had a somewhat happy but very unstable marriage. Eventually, when the marriage broke down, she moved to the United States. She had developed a passion for jazz earlier in life and wanted to be where they made that music. After hearing "'Round Midnight" by Thelonious Monk, she decided it was her life's mission to seek him out and support him, which she did. They were only ever friends, but extremely good ones at that, and Nica took great care of the pretty nonfunctional (outside of music, of course) Thelonious. She also supported and befriended many other jazz legends. Her story is told in a good amount of detail and is well-written, especially for the fact that there doesn't seem to be all that much info out there on Nica.
Despite keeping my interest, I felt I couldn't help wishing it was written by someone who had more of a background in jazz or American culture generally. The author comes off as a bit of a square and essentially admits she wasn't terribly into jazz before starting to work on this book. When she talks about jazz compositions...it becomes pretty obvious she's not super well-versed. When discussing Thelonious Monk's famous "'Round Midnight," she talks about when "the strings" come in....there are no strings in "Round Midnight." There is a plucked double bass, but the way she described it made it clear she is not talking about that. The way she wrote about jazz generally kind of felt that way.
Further, there were a couple of statements I was a bit dubious of. She calls Miles Davis Monk's protege. While they played together at times and Miles learned from him early on in his career, I think it's a stretch to call Miles Monk's protege (in fact, they even had a bit of a rivalry). She also stated that Bud Powell was going to score heroin at one point, which, based on other books I've read about Bud, was definitely not true in the time frame she was discussing. In general, she seemed to be a little out of touch with United States culture and politics. She suggests that black Americans are more likely to become addicted to drugs because when African Americans were enslaved, slavers gave them drugs, so it's in their genes essentially. HIGHLY RACIST, RIGHT? I don't think she really saw the problem with that. AND she attributed racism to people wanting to put others down to make themselves feel better. At best, this all indicates very little thought about the systemic and cultural reasons for racism and substance use disorder. Finally, when talking about Monk's medical treatment, she says that a psychiatric worker who no longer works in psychiatry told her that an EEG "shows the cumulative effects of drugs on the brain." I'm not a medical professional, but that sounds like a suspect claim at best. All of that is essentially why I knocked a star off of an otherwise great book.