What do you think?
Rate this book
A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
A World Made New tells the dramatic story of the struggle to build, out of the trauma and wreckage of World War II, a document that would ensure it would never happen again. There was an almost religious intensity to the project, championed by Eleanor Roosevelt under the aegis of the newly formed United nations and brought into being by an extraordinary group of men and women who knew, like the framers of the Declaration of Independence, that they were making history. They worked against the clock, the brief window between the end of World War II and the deep freeze of the cold war, to forget the founding document of the modern rights movement.
A distinguished professor of international law, Mary Ann Glendon was given exclusive access to personal diaries and unpublished memoirs of key participants. An outstanding work of narrative history, A World Made New is the first book devoted to this crucial moment in Eleanor Roosevelt's life and in world history.
A distinguished professor of international law, Mary Ann Glendon was given exclusive access to personal diaries and unpublished memoirs of key participants. An outstanding work of narrative history, A World Made New is the first book devoted to this crucial moment in Eleanor Roosevelt's life and in world history.
368 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2001
95 people are currently reading
878 people want to read
About the author
Mary Ann Glendon
50 books30 followersMary Ann Glendon is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a former United States Ambassador to the Holy See. She teaches and writes on bioethics, comparative constitutional law, property, and human rights in international law.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 41 reviews
July 11, 2014
A marvelous account of the formulation and development of the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’.
It really had its gestation in 1941 during the Roosevelt – Churchill meeting at Placentia Bay, off Newfoundland, during the very dark days of World War II. At that stage the spread of German Nazism seemed unstoppable. The Atlantic Charter was made with ‘Roosevelt’s freedoms’ – freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.
One could say that the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ is composed of these four main pillars.
The author gives us a history of the evolution of the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ providing us with its’ different draft forms. She also gives us excellent and vivid portrayals of the main protagonists involved. We can say they represent a wide range of humanity – Rene Cassin from France, Charles Malik from Lebanon, P.C. Chang from China, John P. Humphrey from Canada, Housa Meht from India and several others.
Orchestrating and pushing through this agenda was Eleanor Roosevelt. Her prestige, her boundless energy and her unique ability to encompass and empathize with humanity at large made her able to move this ‘Declaration’ to approval at the U.N. General Assembly.
This was no small task.
It is indeed Eleanor Roosevelt’s finest hour. It gives her a lasting legacy that mankind should remember for all time.
The author also gives a very readable description of the meaning of the Declaration – deciphering for us the battles to make it more readable and acceptable to all members of the various committees who participated in its’ writing.
It was passed by the U.N. in 1948; only the Soviet bloc countries and Saudi Arabia abstained from voting. It is not a binding or legal document, but it is a goal that all countries should strive for. Countries today are judged by their adherence to it and many new countries add parts of it to their constitution. Human rights groups, such as Amnesty International refer to it in their evaluations.
The author acknowledges that it is not perfect, and it creators said as much. However she argues persuasively that human rights are universal. In a fine example near the end of the book a Chinese refugee points out to another delegate at a human rights convention – “If you were to voice dissent from the prevailing view in China, you would end up in a jail, and there you would soon be asking for your rights, without worrying about whether they were ‘American’ or ‘Chinese’ ”.
The ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ is for mankind. As another dissident pointed out ‘rights are for everyone, not just westerners’.
It really had its gestation in 1941 during the Roosevelt – Churchill meeting at Placentia Bay, off Newfoundland, during the very dark days of World War II. At that stage the spread of German Nazism seemed unstoppable. The Atlantic Charter was made with ‘Roosevelt’s freedoms’ – freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.
One could say that the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ is composed of these four main pillars.
The author gives us a history of the evolution of the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ providing us with its’ different draft forms. She also gives us excellent and vivid portrayals of the main protagonists involved. We can say they represent a wide range of humanity – Rene Cassin from France, Charles Malik from Lebanon, P.C. Chang from China, John P. Humphrey from Canada, Housa Meht from India and several others.
Orchestrating and pushing through this agenda was Eleanor Roosevelt. Her prestige, her boundless energy and her unique ability to encompass and empathize with humanity at large made her able to move this ‘Declaration’ to approval at the U.N. General Assembly.
This was no small task.
It is indeed Eleanor Roosevelt’s finest hour. It gives her a lasting legacy that mankind should remember for all time.
The author also gives a very readable description of the meaning of the Declaration – deciphering for us the battles to make it more readable and acceptable to all members of the various committees who participated in its’ writing.
It was passed by the U.N. in 1948; only the Soviet bloc countries and Saudi Arabia abstained from voting. It is not a binding or legal document, but it is a goal that all countries should strive for. Countries today are judged by their adherence to it and many new countries add parts of it to their constitution. Human rights groups, such as Amnesty International refer to it in their evaluations.
The author acknowledges that it is not perfect, and it creators said as much. However she argues persuasively that human rights are universal. In a fine example near the end of the book a Chinese refugee points out to another delegate at a human rights convention – “If you were to voice dissent from the prevailing view in China, you would end up in a jail, and there you would soon be asking for your rights, without worrying about whether they were ‘American’ or ‘Chinese’ ”.
The ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ is for mankind. As another dissident pointed out ‘rights are for everyone, not just westerners’.
Read
March 19, 2020Zowel erg informatief als entertainend. Sommige dagboeknotities zijn gewoonweg geroddel en ik geniet ervan. De vele Sovjet-afgezanten komen wel erg negatief uit dit verhaal, maar ik weet niet hoeveel dat aan framing ligt, en hoeveel gewoon feitelijk juist is. De Amerikaanse regering onder Truman wordt ook niet echt als lieverdjes afgebeeld.
Dit is een sterk betoog vóór de universele pretentie van de Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens, en mensen die zich haasten om het Westers imperialisme te noemen, raad ik aan het te lezen. Misschien blijf je bij je standpunt, maar het geeft waarschijnlijk nog steeds veel inzicht.
Dit is een sterk betoog vóór de universele pretentie van de Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens, en mensen die zich haasten om het Westers imperialisme te noemen, raad ik aan het te lezen. Misschien blijf je bij je standpunt, maar het geeft waarschijnlijk nog steeds veel inzicht.
August 18, 2023
Terrific and surprisingly concise book about the people who came together from around the world to draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including the U.S.'s Eleanor Roosevelt. The book illuminates the different backgrounds and philosophies of the people that were the key drafters, such as Charles Malik of Lebanon and P.C. Chang of China, rebutting the stereotype that human rights are a Western construct. It helps to know some of the historical background of World War II, but it is not required. The books also delves into the Cold War politics of the time. It also includes an in-depth chapter on the articles of the declaration and how they created an intersection between political rights and social duties.
November 29, 2015
The lioness in winter: this is a splendid account of Eleanor Roosevelt after FDR's death, when she was the guiding force on the UN committee that crafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration is already a foundation to a body of international human-rights law, a foundation that has steadily grown in importance over the last half century. The book does justice to it, and to her.
The title is from her nightly prayer: "Our Father, who has set a restlessness in our hearts and made us all seekers after that which we can never fully find, forbid us to be satisfied with what we make of life. ... Save us from ourselves and show us a vision of a world made new."
The title is from her nightly prayer: "Our Father, who has set a restlessness in our hearts and made us all seekers after that which we can never fully find, forbid us to be satisfied with what we make of life. ... Save us from ourselves and show us a vision of a world made new."
May 25, 2015
5 stars for the history. 3 for the analysis.
July 9, 2025
“to accept the claim that meaningful cross-cultural discussions of freedom and dignity are impossible is to give up the hope that the political fate of humanity can be affected by reason and choice. it is to accept that human affairs are inexorably determined by force and accident. it is to give the last word to the athenians at melos and all their successors throughout the ages.”
overall good introduction to universal human rights discussions and international human rights philosophy and law, just very dense and at times disorganized
overall good introduction to universal human rights discussions and international human rights philosophy and law, just very dense and at times disorganized
November 18, 2025
Read this one for class. Despite my being unfamiliar with the material, Glendon did a good job at making this book easy to read. I wouldn't have chosen it on my own, but I'm glad I read it, it was very interesting.
February 2, 2016
I read this book a long time ago. I was thinking of it today after watching a documentary that discussed human rights. My one big takeaway from this book--and we are going back here to 2003 or 2004--was that a man named Raphael Lemkin survived the Holocaust then dedicated his life to creating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I keep meaning to learn more about this whole thing, but the UDHR is not something that plays a prominent role in American politics, so it's not like it's on my radar frequently.
Still: I like the UDHR, and wish more people supported it. Also, Eleanor Roosevelt was a total bad-ass.
Still: I like the UDHR, and wish more people supported it. Also, Eleanor Roosevelt was a total bad-ass.
January 5, 2019
A World Made New is an informative book on what went on behind the scenes during the crafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The wording of the Preamble and articles are hassled over by delegates from numerous nations, and A World Made New allows its readers to see every bit of maneuvering and chicanery along the way.
The book functions as a history of the birth of the United Nations, telling the tale of an organization founded to bring something good out of the Second World War's ashes.
While Eleanor Roosevelt's name is (for good reason, as she was the initial chairman of the Human Rights Commission) in the title, the book essentially has five heroes whose actions are integral to the U.N.'s founding: Eleanor Roosevelt, Charles Malik, Rene Cassin, P.C. Chang, and John Humphrey. Each of these individuals are fleshed out well by the author. Elements of their personalities still come through well in the nonfiction format.
Lebanon's Charles Malik plays a major role in shepherding the Declaration through committees, trying to narrow the divide between Western nations and those in the Soviet bloc and developing world. Author Mary Ann Glendon makes the young philosophy professor out to be an intellectual who bridges a lot of the gaps between differing viewpoints and has a devotion to the cause of human rights. Malik is a Christian, and as such has torn feelings as the Middle East begins to experience major upheavals in the late 1940s. The difficult circumstances surrounding the re-initiation of Israel into the family of nations, along with the increasing tensions between the U.S. and Russia in the post World War Two years, makes the job of bridge-building delegates like Malik incredibly difficult. He eventually rises to the HRC chairmanship after Roosevelt steps down.
Rene Cassin of France comes out to the no less dedicated, but his lawyerly, argumentative side comes out on occasion during the process of putting together the U.N.'s declaration. He was ultimately responsible for much of the Universal Declaration's final wording.
The initial recording of the articles was done by John Humphrey, a brilliant Canadian also trained in the law. He appears in A World Made New as a dedicated public servant with a lawyer's eye for making sure the early institutions established by the United Nations stood on as firm of a legal footing as possible.
P.C. Chang brought a different perspective to the Human Rights Committee's Declaration drafting. Like those from the Soviet Union, the delegate from China attached a lot of importance to the economic/social portions of the draft. This proved to be a big divide between the West and China as well as the Soviet satellite states: while the Western countries liked to talk up democracy, the latter liked to talk up the role of government in providing social security for all citizens. Eleanor Roosevelt eventually allowed the inclusion of these types of rights in the final draft, but was careful to point out that the U.S. did not think they implied "an obligation on governments to assure the enjoyment of these rights by direct governmental action." America and a handful of other countries wanted to see aid to the sick, needy, and infirm handled more by private means. Chang pushed what he called "two-mindedness," by which he meant the delegates should attempt to see things from one another's perspective. The book makes him out to be dedicated to finding a common ground between the more individualistic and collectivist outlooks.
A division between the delegates is whether the United Nations should focus more on a declaration of principles or a binding framework of international law its outset. The author seems to indicate that it was a better move to go with a statement of nonbinding principles first, as these often can shame nations into behaving better than claims of international statutes. This is, in fact, exactly what the commission ends up doing.
The book takes place against the backdrop of anticommunism on the part of the U.S. and expansionism/assertiveness on the part of the Soviet Union. Glendon does nice work on showing how these factors made the United States in general and Eleanor Roosevelt in particular reticent to commit one of the world's two superpowers to a U.N. with strong enforcement mechanisms. Concepts like a World Court, embraced by many European nations, would be controversial and remain so in the United States. The challenges of forming a document that would satisfy diverse countries (religiously, racially, philosophically) are well-documented, and Glendon shows how the early U.N. founders did their best to synthesize different ideas into a framework of undeniable truths of human nature which will always be worthy of protection.
The manner in which the U.S. and U.S.S.R. were both willing to pick and choose which human rights they would accuse the other of violating provided an early warning sign of the risk of having the term human rights being too poorly defined. Issues such as these provided a sad undertone to A World Made New, demonstrating how creating a useful international organization to settle disagreements among countries would always remain a work in progress.
This is an important book for the documentation it provides of the U.N.'s birth pangs. The insightful look at how much went into creating a Declaration that over fifty countries could sign off on underscores just how much effort would be required to make sure the United Nations remained relevant in a world of scores of different perspectives and beliefs.
-Andrew Canfield Denver, Colorado
The book functions as a history of the birth of the United Nations, telling the tale of an organization founded to bring something good out of the Second World War's ashes.
While Eleanor Roosevelt's name is (for good reason, as she was the initial chairman of the Human Rights Commission) in the title, the book essentially has five heroes whose actions are integral to the U.N.'s founding: Eleanor Roosevelt, Charles Malik, Rene Cassin, P.C. Chang, and John Humphrey. Each of these individuals are fleshed out well by the author. Elements of their personalities still come through well in the nonfiction format.
Lebanon's Charles Malik plays a major role in shepherding the Declaration through committees, trying to narrow the divide between Western nations and those in the Soviet bloc and developing world. Author Mary Ann Glendon makes the young philosophy professor out to be an intellectual who bridges a lot of the gaps between differing viewpoints and has a devotion to the cause of human rights. Malik is a Christian, and as such has torn feelings as the Middle East begins to experience major upheavals in the late 1940s. The difficult circumstances surrounding the re-initiation of Israel into the family of nations, along with the increasing tensions between the U.S. and Russia in the post World War Two years, makes the job of bridge-building delegates like Malik incredibly difficult. He eventually rises to the HRC chairmanship after Roosevelt steps down.
Rene Cassin of France comes out to the no less dedicated, but his lawyerly, argumentative side comes out on occasion during the process of putting together the U.N.'s declaration. He was ultimately responsible for much of the Universal Declaration's final wording.
The initial recording of the articles was done by John Humphrey, a brilliant Canadian also trained in the law. He appears in A World Made New as a dedicated public servant with a lawyer's eye for making sure the early institutions established by the United Nations stood on as firm of a legal footing as possible.
P.C. Chang brought a different perspective to the Human Rights Committee's Declaration drafting. Like those from the Soviet Union, the delegate from China attached a lot of importance to the economic/social portions of the draft. This proved to be a big divide between the West and China as well as the Soviet satellite states: while the Western countries liked to talk up democracy, the latter liked to talk up the role of government in providing social security for all citizens. Eleanor Roosevelt eventually allowed the inclusion of these types of rights in the final draft, but was careful to point out that the U.S. did not think they implied "an obligation on governments to assure the enjoyment of these rights by direct governmental action." America and a handful of other countries wanted to see aid to the sick, needy, and infirm handled more by private means. Chang pushed what he called "two-mindedness," by which he meant the delegates should attempt to see things from one another's perspective. The book makes him out to be dedicated to finding a common ground between the more individualistic and collectivist outlooks.
A division between the delegates is whether the United Nations should focus more on a declaration of principles or a binding framework of international law its outset. The author seems to indicate that it was a better move to go with a statement of nonbinding principles first, as these often can shame nations into behaving better than claims of international statutes. This is, in fact, exactly what the commission ends up doing.
The book takes place against the backdrop of anticommunism on the part of the U.S. and expansionism/assertiveness on the part of the Soviet Union. Glendon does nice work on showing how these factors made the United States in general and Eleanor Roosevelt in particular reticent to commit one of the world's two superpowers to a U.N. with strong enforcement mechanisms. Concepts like a World Court, embraced by many European nations, would be controversial and remain so in the United States. The challenges of forming a document that would satisfy diverse countries (religiously, racially, philosophically) are well-documented, and Glendon shows how the early U.N. founders did their best to synthesize different ideas into a framework of undeniable truths of human nature which will always be worthy of protection.
The manner in which the U.S. and U.S.S.R. were both willing to pick and choose which human rights they would accuse the other of violating provided an early warning sign of the risk of having the term human rights being too poorly defined. Issues such as these provided a sad undertone to A World Made New, demonstrating how creating a useful international organization to settle disagreements among countries would always remain a work in progress.
This is an important book for the documentation it provides of the U.N.'s birth pangs. The insightful look at how much went into creating a Declaration that over fifty countries could sign off on underscores just how much effort would be required to make sure the United Nations remained relevant in a world of scores of different perspectives and beliefs.
-Andrew Canfield Denver, Colorado
April 21, 2014
Just brilliant.
January 17, 2024
"Franklin Roosevelt's famous, 'four freedoms'- freedom of speech and belief, freedom from fear and from want" (p. xviii).
"...the more the declaration is pulled apart and politicized, the higher the risk that protection of human rights will become a pretext for imposing the will of the strong by armed intervention or economic pressure" (p. xviii).
These world leaders were so goddamn prescient! It's really frustrating that everyone knew exactly what today's problems would be seventy years ago, and here we are anyway.
There are so many elucidating quotes!
Eleanor Roosevelt quoting her late husband Theodore, "'Freedom without bread ... has little meaning" (p. 43).
"Prior to world war II, legal positivism (the view that there are no rights other than those granted by the laws of the state) flourished in the United States and Europe and was dogma in the Soviet Union. But legally sanctioned atrocities committed in Nazi Germany had caused many people to reevaluate the proposition that there is no higher law by which the laws of nation-states can be judged" (p. 176). (And here I took inalienable human rights as a given).
Even in the first draft of this thing, SEVENTY years ago, everyone had a right to medical care, universal basic income, food, employment, housing, and education! It's unfathomable in the United States.
No less than five massive wars were pending when this was going on just post WWII (when governments and individuals were still recovering)! We get taught so much about WWII and nothing about what happened after it. They taught us nothing about these subsequent wars, the formation of the UN, or this declaration! This is an interesting and informative work. This should be taught in every school in America and beyond.
"...the more the declaration is pulled apart and politicized, the higher the risk that protection of human rights will become a pretext for imposing the will of the strong by armed intervention or economic pressure" (p. xviii).
These world leaders were so goddamn prescient! It's really frustrating that everyone knew exactly what today's problems would be seventy years ago, and here we are anyway.
There are so many elucidating quotes!
Eleanor Roosevelt quoting her late husband Theodore, "'Freedom without bread ... has little meaning" (p. 43).
"Prior to world war II, legal positivism (the view that there are no rights other than those granted by the laws of the state) flourished in the United States and Europe and was dogma in the Soviet Union. But legally sanctioned atrocities committed in Nazi Germany had caused many people to reevaluate the proposition that there is no higher law by which the laws of nation-states can be judged" (p. 176). (And here I took inalienable human rights as a given).
Even in the first draft of this thing, SEVENTY years ago, everyone had a right to medical care, universal basic income, food, employment, housing, and education! It's unfathomable in the United States.
No less than five massive wars were pending when this was going on just post WWII (when governments and individuals were still recovering)! We get taught so much about WWII and nothing about what happened after it. They taught us nothing about these subsequent wars, the formation of the UN, or this declaration! This is an interesting and informative work. This should be taught in every school in America and beyond.
August 19, 2023
That subtitle of this book is a tad misleading. Yes, it provides an intriguing look at Eleanor Roosevelt’s essential role in shaping the Declaration, along with the personal and professional context in which that work took place. I bought this book at the Roosevelt International Park on Campobello Island in New Brunswick, where the family used to summer. The park does a good job of conveying Eleanor’s unique attributes and contributions, which made me want to find a book about her rather than FDR. This was the ticket!
The book, however, is about much more than Roosevelt. It also provides mini-biographies of her key collaborators, most of whom were rather impressive figures yet largely forgotten by history. It also give a unique behind-the-scenes look at the inner workings of the development of a milestone cultural and policy instrument. As someone who’s worked on developing policy instruments - albeit of far less significance - I enjoyed reading about and could relate to that insight.
But Glendon does even more in this volume. She paints the picture of the larger historical context in which the Declaration took shape, illustrating the very narrow window in which it could - and perhaps needed to - happen.
And, she articulates its legacy and significance, which I certainly did not appreciate.
All of that is woven together skillfully in a concise and informative read, which seems to have held up over the 2+ decades since it was published.
The book, however, is about much more than Roosevelt. It also provides mini-biographies of her key collaborators, most of whom were rather impressive figures yet largely forgotten by history. It also give a unique behind-the-scenes look at the inner workings of the development of a milestone cultural and policy instrument. As someone who’s worked on developing policy instruments - albeit of far less significance - I enjoyed reading about and could relate to that insight.
But Glendon does even more in this volume. She paints the picture of the larger historical context in which the Declaration took shape, illustrating the very narrow window in which it could - and perhaps needed to - happen.
And, she articulates its legacy and significance, which I certainly did not appreciate.
All of that is woven together skillfully in a concise and informative read, which seems to have held up over the 2+ decades since it was published.
February 24, 2018
I’ve read lots about Eleanor’s youth as well as her married years and time as First Lady. This book taught me more about her crowning glory, the Eleanor without Franklin, when she chaired the committee that wrote the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The document is coming up on age 70 this year, and still has great moral stature in its challenge to “the long-standing view that a sovereign state’s treatment of its own citizens was that nation’s business and no p e else’s.” (79). Eleanor had long been the conscience of her country; now she moved onto the world stage with her dignity and kindness and moral persuasion.
I liked getting to know the key players: PC Chang who brought Confucian and Taoist perspective; Charles Malik of Lebanon who parlayed small nation status to great accomplishment as chair of the review committee; the ultimate diplomat Pierre Cassin who went on to win the Peace Prize; and Canadian John Humphrey who gives bureaucrats a good name, having led the writing of the first draft and then stayed with the UN for 20 years of establishment.
The hard part of reading this book is its slow pace and meticulous detail.
The best part is gaining an understanding of the interplay of economic, social, and legal systems, and the way that one document could be general enough to embrace and respect all cultures.
The document is coming up on age 70 this year, and still has great moral stature in its challenge to “the long-standing view that a sovereign state’s treatment of its own citizens was that nation’s business and no p e else’s.” (79). Eleanor had long been the conscience of her country; now she moved onto the world stage with her dignity and kindness and moral persuasion.
I liked getting to know the key players: PC Chang who brought Confucian and Taoist perspective; Charles Malik of Lebanon who parlayed small nation status to great accomplishment as chair of the review committee; the ultimate diplomat Pierre Cassin who went on to win the Peace Prize; and Canadian John Humphrey who gives bureaucrats a good name, having led the writing of the first draft and then stayed with the UN for 20 years of establishment.
The hard part of reading this book is its slow pace and meticulous detail.
The best part is gaining an understanding of the interplay of economic, social, and legal systems, and the way that one document could be general enough to embrace and respect all cultures.
March 13, 2022
I found it boring and not written in a way that felt nothing other than a tedious summation of notes aimed at bringing different foreign leaders together and their case notes of how that was discussed to produce a bill of rights. He said she said the state said. If you are interested in how the declaration came about in an extremely detailed way you might like it.
I was gifted this book but am interested in the subject matter of history.
I wanted to learn and to admire a woman in an American government and knew nothing of Mrs. Roosevelt.
It appears without any training or education in the way of international affairs she was able to persuade a reluctant State Dept. to accept the social and economic aspects to the Declaration.
Learned from the book she had once opposed a Jewish State but something changed her views and hardened
Her Friend and Aid Duward Sandifer, said of the former first lady in those days,
"she impressed me as having an open mind on every subject other than Palestine"
\
There was something of note in the preface about the treaties misconception of being a product of Western Imperialism and the entire book may be attempt to prove it otherwise. Who knows.
I was gifted this book but am interested in the subject matter of history.
I wanted to learn and to admire a woman in an American government and knew nothing of Mrs. Roosevelt.
It appears without any training or education in the way of international affairs she was able to persuade a reluctant State Dept. to accept the social and economic aspects to the Declaration.
Learned from the book she had once opposed a Jewish State but something changed her views and hardened
Her Friend and Aid Duward Sandifer, said of the former first lady in those days,
"she impressed me as having an open mind on every subject other than Palestine"
\
There was something of note in the preface about the treaties misconception of being a product of Western Imperialism and the entire book may be attempt to prove it otherwise. Who knows.
December 20, 2019
Bra bok som sätter deklarationen om de mänskliga rättigheterna i lite perspektiv.
- man insåg att man inte skulle kunna komma överens om vad som var grunden för rättigheterna och skyldigheterna så man beslöt sig för att endast koncentrera sig på det praktiska.
- den är resultatet av kompromisser.
- deklarationen ska läsas som en helhet. Man kan inte rycka ut en artikel som passar för stunden.
- man insåg att man inte skulle kunna komma överens om vad som var grunden för rättigheterna och skyldigheterna så man beslöt sig för att endast koncentrera sig på det praktiska.
- den är resultatet av kompromisser.
- deklarationen ska läsas som en helhet. Man kan inte rycka ut en artikel som passar för stunden.
August 31, 2021
Pretty well done.
Initially as different figures are being introduced it can be hard to follow, but most of the key players come into focus pretty well.
There are ways in which the book is more encouraging than I expected, pointing out ways in which the declaration has had an impact. Certainly, there is more promise to be realized, but it is an achievement, and it is good to know more about it.
Initially as different figures are being introduced it can be hard to follow, but most of the key players come into focus pretty well.
There are ways in which the book is more encouraging than I expected, pointing out ways in which the declaration has had an impact. Certainly, there is more promise to be realized, but it is an achievement, and it is good to know more about it.
February 9, 2021
An excellent treatment of the development of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, complete with fascinating character biographies and a riveting revelation of the inherent tension between competing philosophical, political, cultural and religious frameworks that had to be navigated in order to produce this historic achievement!
March 20, 2018
This is a book that enlarged my understanding of the world I live in. It is a history of the way in which the Declaration of Human Rights came into existence and what it means now and may mean in the future to the people of the world.
May 7, 2024
Lo lei para la U jksls
Estuvo bueno pese a todo( me costo caleta enganchar con el libro y agarrarle el timing) y me re saco de la zona de confort aunque derrpende se alargaba en cosas medio inecesarias o repetitivo con ciertas palabras, igual me gustaron caleta los ultimos cap jsksl
Estuvo bueno pese a todo( me costo caleta enganchar con el libro y agarrarle el timing) y me re saco de la zona de confort aunque derrpende se alargaba en cosas medio inecesarias o repetitivo con ciertas palabras, igual me gustaron caleta los ultimos cap jsksl
February 14, 2020
I looked this book because it had a lot of interesting facts about Eleanor Roosevelt. I like how it talked about Eleanors background and how she go to the place she did.
September 25, 2023
Indispensable for anyone wanting to learn about the genesis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
May 8, 2025
INteresting but reads like a history book.
April 10, 2022
absolutely packed with so much information about such a seminal document within the realm of human rights and international recognition of human rights and clearly very well researched. really liked how it focused on the movers and shakers of the document outside of just what they were doing in the un. however........ i have a few bones to pick with how this book is structured, how it deals with historical context/events, and how it deals with criticisms of eleanor roosevelt and the declaration itself
February 23, 2021
In the Post World War II era, the United Nations were interested in coming up with a Universal Declaration of Human Rights to ensure that people all over the world were treated with basic dignity and rights to live and thrive. This was an effort to prevent more atrocities like the Holocaust from being committed. Eleanor Roosevelt was an intelligent, outspoken lady, who had an extreme interest in this endeavor. She used all her diplomatic skills to get everyone in agreement on this and get something signed. It was a very good read, and I learned a lot.
October 17, 2010
A very interesting and easy read on the origin and mechanics of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Opened my eyes to many things. Glendon definitely approaches from the perspective of adoration for Roosevelt, and tries very hard to make the point that this is NOT a western document. She also takes on the word "universal" and argues that the precepts found in UDHR really can be found in almost every culture. Her argument is fairly good, if not 100% convincing. Well-written, at the very least.
Read
November 10, 2016This served as a text book for my Human Rights class this semester, and while I found the writing to be incredibly dry, when it could have, in my opinion, been far more interesting, I learned quite a bit. Before reading, I knew very little about the founding of the United Nations, and what it took for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to come into being. Very well researched, packed with information, if you're interested in learning even more about Eleanor Roosevelt, this is a good start.
November 26, 2009
UDHR was a miracle. It took excellent leadership in Mrs. Roosevelt and some others to bring it to fruition. Both eastern and western philosophy were considered by the drafters at the UN. Those that did not vote for it (abstained/no one voted it down) did it for political reasons (Soviets did not want citizens leaving USSR/freedom of changing nationality/movement).
Dr. Glendon did a good job in making the plot interesting.
Dr. Glendon did a good job in making the plot interesting.
July 21, 2015
Very thoughtful account of a major joint undertaking with significant benefit to humankind. Insights into the cast of characters involved and the unique contribution each made. Enjoyed description of the working methods and the reflections on the value of non-binding international agreements. Some of that is relevant to my work supporting negotiations of the Universal Paris Climate Agreement. Great to get to know more about that great leader Eleanor Roosevelt.
July 1, 2024
finished just in time for Human Rights Day 2023 after putting it off for 3 years. The book provides a detailed account of UDHR negotiations and the dynamic behind it: why it worked, who are the actors, why are the current discourse regarding tensions between rights played out the way it is now, and the rationale behind the rights. It’s slow progressing and can be difficult to read at times but I think it’s a good starting point to everyone who just started learning human rights.
February 5, 2008
This book is a must read for those who want an understanding of the role Eleanor Roosevelt had in the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. She was a fascinating woman who possibly does not get the credit she deserves in shaping how the world views human rights. It is an easy book to read and deals with an important subject.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 41 reviews