This book was all over the place. It felt like there were SO many things going on—a hidden animal reservation in the wilderness, stone people that come to life, a random evil stone troll, an ancient tea kettle that senses danger, an evil boy with the endowment to drown people—and it felt like none of these things were very cohesive or naturally blended together. You’d be introduced to one subplot, but then it would sort of fizzle out and be forgotten for a while and then yet another addition to the story would be randomly thrown into the mix and they all became this chaotic mess existing all in one book. It was all just very messy. In fact, having this book be titled “The Beast” seems slightly misleading. It gives the impression that there’s this epic beast that Charlie Bone has to battle and that it’s a constant component in the plot, but that’s not the case at all. I mean, there IS a beast in this book… but it’s Charlie’s classmate Asa. And he’s not battling him or in any serious, mortal danger because of him—he’s trying to save him. Besides Asa, there are so many other events that take place that would probably represent this book as a whole much better. For example: Charlie Bone and the Drowning Boy. Because let’s be real here: Dagbert Endless arguably takes up so much more of the plot than Asa’s capture.
Even the messy plot aside, there were a few things about this book that didn’t quite sit right and other things that just flat-out annoyed me. First of all, there’s the moment when Dagbert tries to turn Charlie’s friends against him. Their reactions to this were incredibly immature, naive, and just not believable to me—particularly Olivia’s in which she says, “I always knew you were a fraud, Charlie Bone!” Like, really? You’ve been with this person through thick or thin—life or death situations—and through ONE misunderstanding that wasn’t even spoken by Charlie himself, that’s enough for you to throw away everything you know deep down about this person, completely abandon your faith, and come back with, “I always knew you were a fraud”?
…
UMMM???
But then eventually Olivia sort of cools off and forgets it even happened? Like, literally, one day Charlie approaches her and she acts like she was never mad at him. I mean, she doesn’t even acknowledge that she wrongly lost her faith in him nor admits that she was wrong for that. No, ”Gee, Charlie, I’m REALLY sorry for thinking you would ever hurt me like that. I should’ve trusted you and talked to you first before jumping to conclusions!” None of that. The matter is just instantly forgotten, which I honestly thought was so immature on Olivia’s part. I mean, she’s sort of always the more immature one in the group, but to just flip a switch like that and not even acknowledge your mistake? UNGH.
On that note, I just got so annoyed with the characters this time around, the good ones as well as the villains—they were all equally annoying! I mean, granted, this is a very elementary middle-grade read, so of course the dialogue is going to be more on the simplistic and childlike side. But it felt like this book was especially cringey and bad. Characters would just be so annoying and pipe into conversations with inane remarks or react to a situation in an incredibly immature way, and the dialogue was just really… bad. There would be times when a character would say something and it would just feel a bit off. You’d think to yourself, “Why did they respond like that?” or “That was… weird.” So these moments were definitely a bit off-putting at times.
Another change in this book I wasn’t very fond of was that some of Charlie’s friends were beginning to get girlfriends and it just felt SO forced? Like, it didn’t feel like a natural part of the story at all but rather Jenny Nimmo thinking, “Huh. They’re getting to be that age. Better throw in some girlfriends to stay relatable with the kids.” On top of that, one of the friends dumped his girlfriend because she was really selfish and wanted him to only pay attention to her all hours of the day, which I feel two things about:
a) OF COURSE, play the ol’ “mean, self-centered clingy girlfriend” card…
b) It further proves the point that the girlfriends were thrown into the story for no deep reason at all if their relationship ended as quickly as it began…
Finally, another major detail of this book that I was supremely dissatisfied with is the fact that Charlie Bone’s father is not in this book at all. You’d think with how the previous book ended—Charlie finally reuniting with his father after going his entire life without him—that this next book would be dedicated to Charlie connecting with his father for the first time, making up for all that time lost, and generally some sweet, tender moments between Charlie and his father. But no, Charlie’s father isn’t present at all but is conveniently "away" on a second honeymoon with Charlie's mother. I just found this to be incredibly cheap and sort of a cop-out: that you would put so much significance on this plot point of Charlie's missing father and continually escalate the anticipation over the course of this series. And then when the mystery finally comes to a close and the moment arrives that we've all been waiting for—Charlie is reunited with his father again—it's all just so anticlimactic, and when the next book comes around the author's like, Oh, Charlie's father? Yeah, we're not discussing him at all." That's honestly such a disservice to your readers, to make them wait that painstakingly long for an incredibly drawn-out plot point and then to not give them a satisfying conclusion by the end of it.
Worst of all: it's not like this book was a crucial part of the series. This book very well could've not existed or been skipped entirely and it would've made no difference in the larger context of the series. I feel like this was such a "filler" novel that just had a lot of nonessential plot points going on. So for the author to have intentionally left out Charlie's father... yet to have this dumpsterfire of a book in its place? UNACCEPTABLE.
As I'm making my way through this series, I'm starting to understand what Jenny Nimmo is great at... as well as what she's not:
Great at
--Delivering vivid, descriptive, atmospheric writing
--Creating imaginative story elements (i.e.: a boarding school for "gifted" students, immortal cats that have magical properties and act as guardian angels to any who need their assistance)
Absolutely sucks at
--PLOT
--DIALOGUE
Now that I'm noticing these things more and more, it definitely has an effect on my enjoyment of these books and I'm finding myself draggggging through this series and desperately wanting to reach the end. Another flaw I think Nimmo has is that she does tend to severely prolong her stories, even when this series could've been MUCH shorter. (I can't believe I still have two more books left!) While these books are definitely still enjoyable to some regard and have a lot of magical, fantastical elements to them, I think they could be made even much more enjoyable if Jenny Nimmo were to fine-tune certain aspects of her craft.