Reviewed before 2012:
"Clarence Jones was one of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr's lawyers, and a member of his intimate circle. He decided to write these memoirs in his old age for posterity. He was a lawyer minding his own business until he heard King preach one day about sacrificing for the good of others, and he was convicted to work for the benefit of the black community. He was w/King throughout the '60s.
Jones spends most of the book setting up some of the lead up to the March on Washington, the event where King gave his ""I Have a Dream"" speech. He talks about the various groups invested in the march, and the tensions b/w some of their goals. He mentions his impressions of discussions, and in particular the time when King was jailed in Birmingham, and wrote ""Letter from Birmingham Jail"". Jones was the one who smuggled in the paper that King wrote the letter on, and smuggle bits of it out in order to publish it. He also was one of the people illegally wiretapped by Hoover and the FBI, who stored the taps under the ""Negro question"" category.
He builds up some anticipation to the march, relating his experiences throughout the day, particularly King's speech, the last of the day. He mentions how King pauses, and in the pause, Mahalia Jackson said to him, ""tell them about the dream"". King had used the theme previously, but it didn't really gain much traction. It, obviously, did this time. It's all a very interesting look at a crazy time, by someone who was very much involved in the Civil Rights Movement.
He ends the book with a look at where we are now, is the dream fulfilled? After all, there is a black man as President. This was a very good chapter that made you think about race relations in America. He talks about how w/o a level playing field economically, the dream of freedom cannot be recognized. Originally, the Congress after the Civil War committed to giving all freed slaves 40 acres and a mule, but it never happened. Jones is a proponent of reparations today. I don't know how that would actually work though. However, I see the argument of the level playing field - when its not level, its hard to have equal opportunity. Its well known, poor children tend to become poor adults, no matter what skin color.
I think another aspect is missing however, and that's actually becoming color blind. Even if economic conditions improved among black community, an us vs them mentality can still exist. For blacks, it could be, ""payback"". For whites, it could be, ""make sure they don't pay us back"". People need to realize its stupid to think along such lines, and combined with a level playing field, you really would see a reduction in racism (altho racism itself has become very broad these days, can mean almost anything).
He talks about Obama's presidency, and the debate w/in black community of whether he should advance the "Black Agenda", or represent all Americans evenly. It's a tough question. How can we be color blind if he were to advance an agenda based on color? Yet, if the playing field is not level, how does it get there? Two things pulling each other in opposite directions.
By the way, the US could afford to raise all poor people to a higher standard of living, mostly by giving good education. Its not a matter of being able to afford it. There's a reason banks and auto companies get bailed out, and poor people don't. "