Reread. I think it's the third time I've read this, lol. Still just as good as ever. I did just read some stupid 1-star reviews though so I wanted to take a second to address some of the complaints I've seen about the book and talk about why I enjoy it.
That said, before I get into it....YES, this review WILL contain spoilers for this book that was literally published over two decades ago.
The Last Vampire really reminds me of Interview With The Vampire--we're basically hearing an immortal recount their memoir from creation to present day. The story stretches back 5000 years in scope, and Alisa's voice is convincing both as an immortal from another time and as a creature slightly removed from humanity but still capable of intense emotions. I've seen a few people say she's "a Mary Sue" and a special snowflake, purely because she knows she's attractive and powerful, which, come on.
Really? Are we still packaging misogynist double standards into our opinions of books where any woman with self-confidence who doesn't constantly shit on herself is bemoaned as a bad character?
The thing is it's not even just female characters anymore; any character who is powerful, confident, or accomplished is hated by a large portion of readers and fans. The entire Marvel fandom has a fucking war every time the discussion of overpowered characters, especially overpowered female characters, comes up, and I genuinely hate it. Our current culture romanticizes self-hate and incompetence. I like heroes who are allowed to be heroes, who are allowed to be skilled and accomplished, or heroes who are just allowed to be unique characters with unique issues and problems, who aren't forced to talk shit about themselves every five minutes so I as the reader can feel like they're like me. A character does not have to be like every other anxious self-depreciating nerdy reader out there to be relatable, nor should they. At this point almost every character is like that, and it feels like blatant pandering.
Confident characters have a place in stories. Powerful characters have a place in stories. Sita is an interesting, unique main character, and her experience is that of an outcast on the fringes of society. When the entire book is framed as the last vampire ever telling her story because she feels like it might end soon, reflecting on her 5000 years of life. Why would you expect her to be some stuttering wallflower with confidence issues or a whimp? Why would you expect her to be like other girls? And on that note, let's talk about the whole "not like other girls" trope.
Sita does, admittedly, note that she's not like the girls around her. She also notes that she's not like the other teens around her. Or the men around her. Or literally anybody around her. If she was only like this to females, maybe it would be fair to read it as her having some issue with other women and call it that trope, but she's like this with everyone, because the entire point is that she is alienated from everyone. She is removed from humanity. She's the last vampire. She's ancient. Everyone is like an ant to her. Again, I gotta ask, what else could you expect from this book?
I think the biggest problem for a lot of people will be the instalove, which:
1) The intense popularity of the 'omg I hate instalove!' trend is a perfect example of being careful what you wish for. It was so nice to see readers demanding authors actually develop couples instead of just smashing them together and insisting they're in love, but then it became so popular to hate instalove that literally any storyline dealing with infatuation or love at first sight, even if it is absolutely explained and justified in-world, is met with a knee-jerk reaction of "This is bad!" even when it genuinely suits the story at hand or is well-written and explored with care.
2) Infatuation and instalove are not the same thing.
3) A book possessing a trope you personally do not like does not make that book poorly written, it means it's not to your taste and there's a difference.
I get it, it can be annoying, and Ray IS the weakest part of this book for me. I find him and Sita much more interesting as a creator/fledgling than as lovers. That said, her infatuation with him is much less nonsensical when you take into account the actual context of the book and world, which is that, first of all, it is common for Sita to take an instant liking to charming and beautiful humans and keep them as friends and pets of sorts, which she mentions doing several times throughout the book, and two, he reminds her eerily of her dead husband from when she was a human who she never got to see again and has missed for five thousand years, and third of all, she thinks her life may be coming to an end soon and has been feeling sentimental, which she notes in the literal opening chapters. Her infatuation with him makes absolute sense. And considering she has an alluring effect on humans and is basically hypnotic, and some people are naturally more curious about or drawn to her inhuman nature, so do his feelings for her.
As for Sita admitting to killing his father and Ray simply replying that she loves him...he's clearly trying to make sense of her motives and understand what she's thinking and how her mind works. He's confused because she's telling him something that directly conflicts with his understanding of her, and he's reasoning things out out loud and trying to communicate with her. He's not batting aside the issue of her killing his father, he's trying to grasp which emotions she feels and why, and reason with her decisions. He also makes it clear he doesn't want to talk about his father again and sets a clear boundary around it. He does know his father tried to blackmail her first, and, as unhealthy as it is for him to forgive or set aside what she did....where else is Ray going to go? He's a teenager who just broke his girlfriend's heart and found out his side chick is a vampire AND killed his dad AND they're both being hunted by some ancient monster, seriously, what are his options? Especially when their enemy arrives before he can even make any decisions or fully process the info anyway?
Sita essentially stalking him and being obsessed with him is predatory, but she's written that way on purpose. I don't think the inhumanity of it makes the story less entertaining, especially when it's a genre staple. And he does posses an eerie resemblance to her ancient dead husband who she never got over...another genre staple/cliche. But it does explain her actions. I don't think Ray trying to puzzle them out himself makes it a bad book. Personal taste notwithstanding.
At this point in the vampire genre....why do you even pick up a vampire book if you think it's going to be full of healthy human/vampire relationships? Those relationships are never going to be equal or healthy and that's not ever going to be a staple of the genre. Edward and Bella were fairly well-adjusted in comparison to some of the vampire couples out there, that's probably as good as it's going to get. If you can't cope, or you want every character to be a 100% well-adjusted role model (but not TOO well-adjusted or TOO confident or then they're a Mary Sue, remember!) vampire books probably aren't for you.
I'd also like to briefly touch on the aids plotline: a minor male character has aids and I think in some earlier editions of the book (this line is not present in my omnibus copy printed in 2009 or so) Sita asks him how he got it because he doesn't seem gay. A lot of people are up in arms about this being homophobia and as a certified homosexual I'd like to say....bullshit. The fact that a book from the 90s is even broaching this, especially while painting the character, Seymour, in a positive and sympathetic light, is amazing. And I'd also like to note to the complaints surrounding this line ("Oh, so only gay people get aids?") No, of course we don't, which is the entire point--he's a straight male virgin who has aids, and this was probably put in for the teen readership of the time as a lesson to them. This is the 90s equivalent of Christopher Pike waving around a rainbow flag and shouting into a megaphone "Not only gay people get aids! Educate yourselves!" Of course it's easy for a modern audience to take this out of context, but it was an act of allyship probably included in the book to defend gay people and educate about the reality of aids, and it's unfair to strip it of context, especially while ignoring that Sita herself is bisexual and has had many male and female lovers, which is mentioned several times in the book. It is downright progressive for its time, especially considering teen books and children's books were still lumped together so this was considered children's publishing.
The Last Vampire has got great action scenes, an interesting protagonist who isn't exactly like every other heroine out there ever (but I guess some people think that's a bad thing, lol) and it's a book from that time in the mid-to-late 90s right around where I was born when book packagers were churning out these fantastic paranormal series for teens by the bucketloads. This is one of the much better ones. It doesn't even feel too dated aside from one or two paragraphs about disk drives and floppy disks in the middle of the book, LOL. What a time.