I ride my bike to work nearly every day that is above 20 degrees and not raining or snowing. I also ride to other places and take long trips on my own or with my wife on our tandem. I LOVE to bicycle! My daughter knows this too, and that it was very thoughtful of her to select this book to give to me as a Christmas present. It was a thought-provoking book whose conclusions gave me pause even when I disagreed with some.
As a bicyclist myself, I like that he focused on the act of bicycling—the enjoyment itself-- rather than promoting cycling as a way to exercise and stay in shape or a way to be green, and superior to others. Bicycling, I know, and Byrne acknowledges, is not practical for most people, and for even for those that it is, most people cannot or will not make the sacrifice. But the book will spur some people to try it out… and that’s a great thing.
It is obvious that Byrne loves to ride.…. it’s an activity that he says keeps him centered and sane….. it’s like a regular mini vacation. I agree. Throughout the book, Byrne makes some keen observations regarding human nature and our social condition. He uses bicycling, as he observes in his introduction, first, to find out about cities, and more specifically, to explore, and make hypotheses about the types of “social animals” that live and create different cities. Secondly, his cycling travels are a “kind of self-examination, with the city functioning as a mirror.”
Byrne’s book succeeds in his first objective, to shed light on the humans who live and create cities. He succeeds also in his second objective too--- to examine and explain himself. Unfortunately here, there is much to be critical of.
He offers unwarranted criticism of the automobile and the businesses that brought us this liberating invention. If he were honest, he’d have to admit that it was the automobile, and more specifically the road building it spurred that give us bicyclists the pavement we need to ride.
When I ride, I notice the beauty…. the arrangement of the clouds as the sun peaks through, the Canadian goose flying overhead, or the groundhog sniffing cues from the wind. Byrne does this too, but apparently not in America. In American cities, including my own beloved Columbus Ohio, he only sees decay, abandonment, and Marxist alienation. Even Niagra Falls is described as “mighty weirdness”.
American suburbs might be peaceful concedes Byrne, but they are boring and hurtful. As he bikes by, he imagines that its youth using razor blades to cause themselves enough pain to over come their “feeling deprived” environment.
Capitalism is seemingly embodied by George Eastman who lived and even, imagines Byrne, slept with his mom until he commits suicide.
In smaller towns, creative repression by the church is the rule, and football coaches are the only “wise men” Elsewhere, “white financial hegemony” ensures that minorities and the non-conventional are kept in place.
His anti-Americanism and cultural elitism is so relentless that by the end of the section on American cities Byrne himself writes of his sorrow in having painted such “a bleak picture” of America. No kidding. I thought to myself that if Byrne’s rides are always this depressing, why does he bother to continue doing it? Also, I thought about what fundamental assumptions Byrne holds that point him towards such analysis. He partially answers this question later when he points to what he calls two big self-deceptions people make: 1. that life has meaning, and 2. that each of us is unique.
Surprisingly though, Byrne has not yet hit his low point…..moving to Europe, he spends five pages complete with pornographic photos, on a man he seemingly admires, sexual predator Otto Muehl. I almost quit reading at that point but I’m glad I didn’t because the book greatly improved thereafter, with only occasional and odious jabs at the market, America, Christianity, George Bush ,Fox News and of course how Mr. Obama would save us from all those things.. But ignoring that, I enjoyed is observations on:
The bright side of urban neglect; surveillance in the Communist era, reparations, public perceptions of bicyclists, art as exploitation, how markets spontaneously organize in efficient manners (undercutting his other anti-market statements and underscoring his economic cluelessness); violence in sexually segregated societies, the media, art and music. His last section on New York and the bicycling tip in the appendix were interesting too.
If you keep in mind Byrne’s sometimes extreme biases, it’s a book well worth reading. I gave it four stars.