Getting In is the APA’s most comprehensive guide to admissions to graduate school in psychology. I was a bit underwhelmed with the book. It did not really teach me anything more than what I already knew about graduate school admissions. By far the most relevant content came from the actual data about graduate school admissions. It a redundant part of the guide was the repeating of what was going to be discussed and what was discussed: paragraphs of introduction about where to go to get more information, what will be talked about and what was just talked about. It was an extremely short read. What I also found a bit disappointing was how difficult it was to apply the information to the Canadian system, despite the APA also accrediting Canadian schools. What I learned the most from this book is the sheer diversity of admissions programs and values by different universities. Indeed, there is not ONE sure-way to get in. It all depends on what the university considers important. All universities have their own admissions systems, which is not hampered by some centralized regulation committee. This is best reflected by all the different financial support systems each university has. Nevertheless, there are some similarities shared by all of them, despite there being significant differences when it comes to the weighing of each attribute. Most universities prioritize the following aspect when it comes to considering applicants: GPA, Recommendation letters, Research experience, Clinical experience, Letters of purpose and Interviews. Some universities put most of their weight on GPA, others on Letters of recommendation, still more on the letters of purpose and interviews. But there seems to be filtering systems, which starts with the GPA. A GPA below a certain threshold does not let you go through the first filter. Some universities that praise GPAs a lot have their filter very narrow, while other universities that are more holistic have their filters much broader. Then, letters of recommendation and securing a supervisor seems to be most important. Then you have your letter of purpose, then your research experience, and finally your clinical experience. The most interesting graph I found was one looking at the weight given for each part of the application. What I found disappointing is that I learned this information by myself, not really through this guide. Hence, I wish that there was more information regarding how universities actually process applicants. It really gives the information that the admissions process is a black box. You put everything in and you have no idea of the actual probability of getting accepted into the program or not. You also have no information on why you were rejected. You don’t know how many students applied, how many got accepted, what differentiated you from those students. There’s this arbitrariness to it that makes it seem genuinely unfair. Still, no process is perfect - a process that is more fair for one student may become unfair for another student. Another flaw of this book is that it is pretty outdated. It still talks about sending application forms through fax and mail. These processes aren’t really used anymore. This consideration affects others - the guide recommends to contact universities 6 weeks after mailing if there is no response. 6 weeks is a huge amount of time. I’d ask the university at the latest 2 weeks later. This guide is of high quality, definitely, but I suspect that other guides might be of greater use to prepare undergraduate psychology students interested in getting a PhD.