Q:
He’s getting giddy. You wonder if you have ever seen anyone so tired. He’s so tired, Mr. Ribbletropp, that’s he’s shot out the other side of tiredness into a land of strange objects. Like slides. (c)
Q:
At 20 percent growth per year, starting at its current base of about ten thousand consultants, McKinsey will employ every single man, woman, and child in America as soon as May 2060. Fifteen years later, the firm will have to look to other planets for its customers, for every person on Earth will be a McKinseyite. (c) LOL!
Q:
They run the model. In any consulting engagement, the model—pronounced The Model—is the nexus of power. It is an Excel workbook, or multiple workbooks, that is built carefully over a period of weeks with an elaborate cross-mesh of references and formulas so complex it is only really understood by its maker, and often not even by her. The model is a holy thing, like Nomad in Star Trek. It accepts your offerings and issues its cryptic response, which is never questioned, only puzzled over. (c)
Q:
McKinseyites dress in black. They wear black suits and crisp white shirts and thin black ties and walk together like the men in Reservoir Dogs. They are the Men in Black. Long after others abandoned jackets and ties, they persist. BCG, Bain, Booz Allen Hamilton—the three B’s they consider their closest competitors—all three have built B-business-casual workplaces. But not McKinsey. They are taller, smarter, better looking, and better dressed.
But are they really better?
Their work is certainly simpler than your firm’s. Despite being the only management consultancy with a full-time graphics “guru” on staff, McKinsey churns out presentations as plain as any on the planet. There are few words on the page, in large fonts. There are graphs and boxes here and there with straight lines and a minimal use of color. Clip art is vanquished. Curved arrows and “starburst” patterns so beloved of cubicle jockeys are avoided. Every inch of every slide says “We are strategic thinkers. We are the avatars of Truth. We are the Oracle. These are our words.”
...
For simpler slides, true or not, have the advantage of being much easier to create. The clean boxes and fourteen-word messages seem to say “We leave all the really complicated hard work we did off the slide, because you couldn’t understand it. Here’s the bottom line.” (c)
Q:
She laughs a lot—an awful lot for someone who is so obviously a miserable wreck. But then who are you—? (c)
Q:
Consulting Craft Skills for a Well-Stocked Tool Kit
1. Ability to give—and, more important, to receive—erroneous feedback from colleagues and partners
2. Ability to speak with authority about topics of which you are ignorant
3. Intimate knowledge of the consultant’s “lingo”
4. Knowledge of basic mathematics, specifically:
a. Subtraction
b. Addition
c. Multiplication
d. Nonlinear multivariate logistic regression (optional)
Q:
They hired a consultant. That consultant haunted the halls for a few weeks talking to the war-wounded and the battle-weary… and she reported back that what everybody needed was not an end to the madness, no, what they all needed was a week in the woods of New Jersey with their top-tier colleagues from around the world telling one another in excruciating detail just exactly what it is about them that makes them so difficult to work with. (c)
Q:
“What do we know about Jason?” you asked her in what you hoped was a calming tone.
“Fuck all. Nothing. We know his name is Jason and here’s his number and we’re calling him.” (c)
This is one best-ever speech:
Q:
She says this:
Thank you for coming. Today I’d like to socialize our sanity check and robustify the straw man we set up to drive your strong-form learnings going forward. As you know, when we ramped up the pod and began to iterate on the so-what’s, we architected a baseline without boiling the ocean or reinventing the wheel. At the end of the day—net net—our key take-away was that the environmentals in this space are target-rich, and with the right learnings we could chunk out a deck that laid out the red light/green light to top-line growth. We knew this gap analysis was far short of a grand unifying theory, but we liaised with the stakeholders and put a chinning bar up. After a few revs, we got some reasonable pushback that—while our hypotheses were sufficiently outside the box—they were also sporty, and perhaps even off the reservation. Our worry bead at that point was that we were populating a deliverable, but we were not far enough along the curve—and may even, frankly, have been building a mag-a-logue that couldn’t pass the red-face test. Off the record, it was largely PIOUTA and FHA.
[long pause for laughter]
So we did a process check—and a bio break or two [more laughter]—and we decided our journeyline was suboptimal. We got no sat from the client team. A realization came that we were noodling around in la-la mode while we were in reality being incentivized to plug in our skillsets and knowledgeware to drive step change. We were visioning the incrementals, though we had been tasked to blue-sky rich change and drill down to the bogey of really opening the kimono. Once we understood the disconnect, we had a food fight with the summers on the farmer’s math [titters]… and we did what we had to. The stakeholders threw up on the process deck, and we were on receive. We needed to vision this wasn’t the moral equivalent of being the stuckee on a cactus job in a pre-Excellence ecosystem. No—we needed to make a five-forty to keep our cadence true north.
[pause for water and approbation]
The pod remained convinced there was a burning platform, but didn’t have the bandwidth to go into a black factory and blow up the paradigms with a white paper. Ultimately, we fell back on our core competency—we did a bounceback into crunch mode, and reached for your internal capital to take on a brain dump and data dump. With all the air cover we called in, the engagement became a kind of deathmarch into la-la land. But we didn’t want to end up as new alums.
[she chuckles, alone]
Our journeyline took on a lot more granularity. We got better visibility into the real drivers of our exposure, and decided it was game over if we didn’t change the optics. So we did that, and some client education. We knew this particular knowledgeware could have knock-on effects—and could even hockeystick into an advance, or some afterwork. It was determined by the SAs to pro-act and risk the pain zone. They pinged the practice area internal thought leaders and got some key parachutage into the critical path. After that, we were able to avoid a showstopper by assembling a series of work streams to craft a deliverable with a true end state vision.[she looks directly at the audience, pausing for effect]
What we need now is your buy-in for the warm handoff and a warm fuzzy—not to mention the call up for afterwork! (c)
Q:
You, in fact, are taking notes. You’re always taking notes that you will never look at again. It is a method of distancing yourself from the unpleasantness around you, and it’s common. You have noticed that the tenser the meeting, the more frenzied is the note taking—all around. When the partner breaks out the notepad, that is a sign the meeting has become a disaster. (c)
Q:
For years after the firm was founded, Bain consultants had no business cards—and not because they couldn’t afford them. McKinsey consultants are referred to even in some internal documents only by a first name and an initial, like recovering sexaholics. To your knowledge BCG has never publicly admitted to having a single client. (c)