“Like Donna Tartt’s The Secret History or a good film noir…[this book will] keep readers hooked.”
This quote sits loud and proud on the front cover of the book. Every time a book compares itself to the Secret History, I find myself obstinately cynical and mildly tempted to read it purely so I can prove myself right. This one having been written in the early 2000s (rather than being a pandemic cash grab during the online *dark academia* renaissance) made me a little more inclined to delay judgment though; the fact that I had never seen it mentioned on social media was the deciding factor in whether to invest the time.
the synopsis
Jane Hudson is a Latin teacher at a girls’ boarding school in the Adirondacks. The school has a rich, ominous legend that, although dubious, haunts the school and the behavior of the students. Twenty years ago, in the 1970s, Jane was a student at the same school, where both her roommates fell victim to the fate outlined in the legend, and died by suicide. After twenty years of moving through life with no closure and no agency, she winds up freshly divorced and looking for a new life with her young daughter, back at her old school. She begins getting haunting messages from her time as a student, and the legend begins its cycle again. Jumping between past and present, the reader slowly pulls the thread of what happened back then and how it connects to what’s happening now.
the good
I am not usually an easy fan of the two-timelines trope, but I thought it worked well here. It broke up the length of the story and kept the mystery engaging, and made the unraveling of events in the third act much more dramatic. The setting was fun, and the writing was atmospheric. Weather played a big part of the plot which for some reason I am always a fan of. I love an academic setting. I love spooky legends that manifest themselves into something real, living, and inescapable. And no matter how overdone it might be as of recent, classics studies pair deliciously with mystery and morbidity.
I really enjoyed the section of the book that took place in Jane’s past as a student. It felt like an accurate portrayal of what it’s like to be a teenage girl who isn’t anything special. As many pieces of “dark academia” fiction as I’ve consumed, I found it refreshing that this one was set in the 1970s. The time period wasn’t overly exploited in a way that felt gimicky, but a lot of the details nodded to the social climate of the time, which is pretty novel for the genre. In alignment with the theme of this era—which was certainly more colorful than the typical moody, dark setting of DA books set in the 90s—the author chose a very fitting, colorful pagan holiday as the pivotal rite, rather than a savage Greek or spooky occult ritual you would expect. Brilliant!
the not so good
I predicted literally every twist and every surprise that happened in the entire story. All of them. Maybe it’s because I’ve been reading mysteries since I could read, maybe it’s because I am older than the intended audience (I actually have no idea if this was meant to be YA or adult; the writing style feels like the former but the content suggests the latter); I think maybe these reasons are a little generous though. The author was very heavy handed in her foreshadowing which absolutely killed it for me. Every time I solved something too far in advance, I had no doubt I was right, and I was disappointed because I thought they would have been pretty good twists if she’d just let the reader come to them in due time instead of compulsively pointing hard in the direction of the surprise. Reading this felt like playing a game with a kid who can’t help but giggle and look directly at the place they hid the treasure.
While I really enjoyed reading from Jane’s point of view as a high school student, I found adult Jane to be a bore of a narrator, and painfully flat as a character. Things just happen to her and she doesn’t drive the plot at all. That’s pretty realistic for a character whose frontal lobe is far from full development, but she seems to have had zero growth since her adolescence. This is probably meant to be intentional, as time seems to have frozen for her during that ill-fated senior year, but that feels like a cop-out for poor character development. She’s difficult to relate to and is never held accountable for her actions. She sees herself as this doe-eyed little innocent thing, and the story never actually challenges that or holds her accountable for her negligence or cowardice. This could have been a powerful story about unresolved trauma, but it’s kind of just a thriller.
I have a lot to say about the final act but I don’t want to give it away. My friend (who read it at the same time as me) compared it to a Lifetime movie and I really couldn’t have conceptualized it better than that, so I think that’ll suffice. And honestly, If someone pitched it to me as “a dark academia lifetime movie in a book,” I’d be all for it and probably really enjoy it.
Final word: throw out the Secret History comparison, that’s absurd. But if you’ve already read through all the DA BookTok recommendation lists and you want a YA-esque thriller in a spooky academic setting, this is certainly worth the read.
(…unless you don’t want to read about suicide, self-harm, etc. from cover to cover. This book didn’t set out to glorify or romanticize it, and I didn’t find it particularly gory or gratuitous, but it is certainly sensationalized and a major recurring part of the plot.)