I would like to start off this review with an apology: I misjudged this book harshly even before I had read it since (a) the excerpt I read reminded me of too many paranormal YA novels with flat heroines and domineering love interests, (b) it is a book about werewolves, who are almost as overused as vampires by now, and (c) it is an indie book (and I have a love/hate relationship with indie books since they fall into one of three categories -- brilliant, predictable, or just plain awful). I would have ridden off this book because of my preconceived notions, and I would have been very sorry indeed for missing out on it. Basically -- I AM SO GLAD I SPENT 99 CENTS ON IT, AND NOW I WANT A PAPERBACK COPY TO HUG AND SQUEAL OVER. (What a turnaround, eh?)
Here's the story set-up (since reading the excerpt will probably give YOU preconceived notions about this book too): Camille is the would-be assistant to John Bennet, a man who is trying to find a cure for lycanthropy after a devastating turn of events years earlier that has something to do with Camille's past and why her sister lives in an asylum now. This search for a cure includes also hunting and finding werewolves as specimens before killing them off with silver bullets. Everything is going as planned until one night things get out of Camille's and Dr. Bennet's hands. . .and they must help the werewolf victim survive.
I have to give Camille a lot of applause as a heroine. I didn't find her annoying at all (strange, really, since I find most YA heroines at least a *twinge* annoying); actually, I was rather impressed by her. She has a good head on her shoulders, she's not a typical 19th century girl, and she seems to be thinking about more than marriage and babies in her future. In many ways, survival is her main goal, and thus she's rather level-headed. . .until a boy, quite different personality-wise from her, crashes into her life and leaves her a bit topsy-turvy.
Ah, the boy. I was so ready to ride off Nathaniel Strider as a cad with no substance right from the start -- but I'm so glad that, like Camille, I decided to give him a chance even despite his first appearances, all of which involved rather disreputable acts. (There we go again with the preconceived notions!) Yes, he's a bit of a cad and an insufferable flirt -- but he DOES have substance. It's easy to see why Camille becomes taken with him. The two of them have a nice banter between them, wit and sarcasm and chemistry clashing in one tidal wave of emotion. I just loved them together, and every single scene with them had me either smiling or laughing.
No, I'm not here to say that you should read this book because it is EPIC or BRAIN-BENDING. It's just a really nice read that's atmospheric, witty, and a little angsty. (This book even made feel miserable a few times -- but that may be just me, getting swept up in Camille's thoughts and emotions.) What could have made this book better? I think a run-in with another werewolf would have done Strider and Camille some good. That would have added some more action and suspense -- even though for much of the book I waffled between 'Will she kill him? Or won't she?' (It was the same quandary I, quite idiotically, had with Twilight. Even as I approached book four in the series, a part of me was hoping for a darker twist where Edward lost it and actually DID try to kill Bella! I was so ready for the fairy tale to be shattered by one psychopath twist -- but, alas, it did not occur. It did not stop me from speculating and wondering, though!) In the end, with the way things transpired, I was satisfied, and the last few pages even made me smile wistfully.
HOWEVER. . .I want to put out a personal appeal to Tess Oliver: this NEEDS a sequel! It can't just end that way! Give me something more! PLEASE!!! There MUST be a sequel!
Now, tell me: how many books can make someone sound like such a begging, gushing fool in a review? Not many, I would reckon -- so I hope interested readers will track this one down, dole out the 99 cents, and read it. For the right kind of reader, I would hedge my bets and say it would be worth the investment.
(Note: If you read the book yourself and wonder, 'How come this chick gave the book five stars? It's not THAT great,' well, I have this to say: my rating had less to do with innovative writing or blow-your-mind storytelling and more to do with my emotions while reading the book and the attachments I developed to the main characters. I will never give five stars to books where I don't love the characters in some way, so that's why this book earned five stars from me.)