Interesting bits of CIA spy reality, some great descriptions of exciting moments in the field, and some (outdated) insight into the real work of an American spy. I enjoyed the book and found it inspiring at times, but oh my, this book is a mess!
It's a mess from the point of view of the structure, that seems to follow the author's career chronologically, but it really doesn't (initially it does, but then later it becomes a description of his thoughts and investigations). Also, I found some parts to be too detailed, while some other parts are too vague and missing some crucial links.
And it is a mess also from the point of view of the content, that goes from being linear and straight forward at times, to being an absolute cluster of information that don't seem to follow any logic at other times.
Now, the cover of the book says the movie "Syriana" was based on this book. Funny thing is, virtually nothing of this book is represented in Syriana. The movie's director talked with Baer and put together the script based on some "chats" that he had with Baer. But the really bad part is where the director said he purposely wanted to make his movie "confusing", because that is how the work of gathering intelligence is. WTH?
God, I hate these artsy-fartsy logics (I'm talking about the director of Syriana here). So now - for example - because a movie is about whale hunting, we need to be pierced through our chest with harpoons? Why? The whole principle is just logically wrong. The artful confusion is not going to help me better understand the world of intelligence at all.
Anyway, I don't know if Baer followed a similar principle while writing his book, but I really don't think so: I think he just wrote a factual book that happens to be a bit unorganized.
The first part of the book is probably the most interesting, where Baer describes his first years in the CIA. Nice to hear how he learned to work with agents in foreign countries, but unfortunately, given that it was a world without the internet, it's all extremely outdated: this book was written in 2001 - 2002, and so many things have changed since.
Towards the end, Baer unveils his “beef”, his open bitterness towards the CIA. His point is pretty much that, while he and a few others were out there risking their lives trying to do proper intelligence work and properly fighting terrorism, people at HQ were more interested in politics and careers. Basically, he was the real deal, while his superiors were ill-advised clowns.
There must be some truth there, and you can certainly feel Baer's honesty and passion in some chapters. After a while though his argument grows a bit dull, because ... isn't any large organization anywhere plagued with politics and careerism at the highest levels of HQ? Plus, again, he is talking about the CIA of the 90's. I have no idea how things are today, but my guess is, the CIA is doing better today - despite having to deal with delusional 'superheroes' like Edward Snowden.
So, overall, I would recommend reading this for some of its historic content, but certainly not as a text to help you understand what the CIA is today and how it operates.
Yes, human beings still need to be in the field, listening, understanding, speaking with locals, but by now the whole world has gone cyber, and it's safe to assume that a massive chunk of the intelligence work has, too.