For about 30 years I made bi-annual, direct assaults on Mt. Proust, you know, his monumental novel, "In Search of Lost Time." Over that span of yearsI never achieved the summit. I loved the language, as lush as any human being ever formulated, but I couldn't get beyond two or three hundred pages because I simply couldn't see the point. I came to feel, again and again, as his first English publisher felt, "Why does the man require 50 pages to tell us he turned over in bed?" What after all was the point of all this beauty?
So at long last I decided that I might try another path. (It appears that I'm educable after all.) I decided to read every biography of the Proust available to me in English, and I did - all seven or eight of them, one after the other without interruption. I won't say what I learned, but I will say that it was sufficient to lend an understanding of the purpose of Prousts's fiction, its function in his life. After reading the last of his biographies on my shelf, I picked up Proust's novel and read all 3000 pages one after another, with the highest pleasure and greatest profit that I have ever gained from a novel, a book entirely unsurpassed in the Western canon.
All that being said, I will be listing and commenting on those biographies here, and I begin with my least favorite of the lot, George Painter's pedantic and homophobic rant. Painter was one of those insufferably arrogant, priviledged men, a supreme example of the impenetrably obtuse, smug, self-satisified Englishman. His biography consists of a collection of (1) profiles of Proust's acquaintences who came to figure, singly or in combination, in his novel - an utterly vacuous enterprise, not to mention boring, and (2) snearing and condescending sketches of Proust, his person and personality, served up without the least recognition that Proust never did nor ever will require the approval of George Painter, at best a rather minor and entirely forgettable literary figure of the mid- to late- 20th century, in comparison with Prouse, a worm - before he became merely fodder for worms.
I was determined at the outset of my participation in goodreads that I would only list the books that I love, but for the sake of completeness I commented on Painter's book, which for reasons I can't fathom remains in print despite the appearance of three or four biographies that render his pathetic production entirely pointless - if it ever had a point, that is.