My interest in Star Trek has wavered on and off since I first watched The Original Series in the 1970s. I am a big science fiction fan, and I especially enjoy scientifically minded authors in the genre like Greg Egan, Ted Chiang, Stephen Baxter, Philip K. Dick, Stanley G. Weinbaum, and Arthur C. Clarke. Thus, I don’t dig old Trek episodes featuring Abraham Lincoln floating in outer space, Captain Kirk acting like a horse, time travel, and omnipotent, godlike aliens, all of which exemplify a very common and unscientific type of sci-fi.
More than twenty years ago, the Babylon 5 series reignited my interest in exploring science fiction television shows, including Star Trek. I’ve now seen all of The Original Series, The Animated Series, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Enterprise, and the Lower Decks, most of Strange New Worlds and Voyager, some of Prodigy, a bunch of fan films, and I intend to watch the remaining canon, including Discovery. Despite the mostly poor final season of The Original Series, and the very, very shaky first two seasons of The Next Generation, I’ve enjoyed hundreds of the 600+ Star Trek episodes I've watched, and I accept my Trekkie status. That said, I still don’t like the godlike aliens nor most of the stories dealing with time travel (Deep Space Nine’s ‘Children of Time’ is a magnificent exception), nor do I care for the mirror universe concept nor most of the religious digressions. I best enjoy scientific inquiries occurring during space explorations rather than military drama, though I’ve seen a handful of great war-focused episodes in the franchise (Deep Space Nine’s ‘Duet’ is one of the best episodes in the history of television, and ‘In the Pale Moonlight’ is also excellent.)
I enjoy the Kirk, Spock, and McCoy dynamic on The Original Series, and like about half of the episodes from that 1960s run, which established a number of good things, but also popularized time travel, omnipotent beings, and parallel universes. I accept but don’t like the use of magic wand-like transporters, which regularly kill dramatic tension by providing easy ways out of peril (thus they are often arbitrarily “down”or not functioning or blocked), and I feel this technology makes little scientific sense: Dispersing humans into subatomic particles (a.k.a. murder), flinging them through solids and across space, and then reassembling these luminous puddles across vast distances. Even ‘The Fly’ (1958) required a secondary unit to receive and reassemble the atomized (dead) subjects. And yeah, the abundance of humanoid aliens in Star Trek I accept as conceit that made a live-action television production possible in the 1960s and led to more anthropological extrapolations rather than xenobiological ones. (Plus those Michael Westmore-designed alien prosthetics became quite spectacular during Deep Space Nine and Enterprise.) So although I’m a Trekkie, I have perhaps more nitpicks than the average…
I do feel some good science fiction appeared in that initial 1960s run—I really dig ‘A Taste of Armageddon,’ ‘The Doomsday Machine,’ ‘Metamorphosis,’ ‘The Changeling,’ ‘The Devil in the Dark,’ ‘The Trouble with Tribbles,’ and twoscore others to a lesser degree. And although ‘Star Trek: The Motion Picture’ isn’t especially well-liked by Trekkies, it is a great sense-of-wonder science fiction spectacle beautifully aided by visuals crafted by special effects maestro Douglas Trumbull, an innovator behind my all-time favorite movie, ‘2001.’ The smartly written fan film ‘What Ships Are For’ (in Star Trek Continues) also outshines the majority of episodes made for The Original Series.
500+ episodes deep into my exploration of Star Trek, I finally read my first Star Trek book. I did some real research prior to deciding which one to buy, for there seem to be an astonishing 800+ books set in this universe related to the various television series. Many, many, many writers have written for the shows and books under this famous aegis, including hard science fiction authors such as Greg Bear, Joe Haldeman, and Larry Niven, and I knew different takes on this intellectual property were plentiful. My research led me to start with Diane Duane’s highly regarded best seller ‘Spock’s World.’ I was quite impressed with the thoughtful, literary quality of her writing, which compares in some ways to Ursula K. Le Guin’s. The cosmologically detailed formation of planet Vulcan and the pre-language sequences depicting primitive cave Vulcans communicating (poorly) with telepathy and learning about their world were quite compelling, and the history of Surak, the Vulcan philosopher, was quite engaging. That book is recommended to fans of The Original Series who want to read a story featuring those familiar characters and gain a broader historical perspective about Vulcans.
‘Prime Directive’ by Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens is my second Star Trek novel, a book I’d recommend to fans of the show, but also to science fiction fans in general, for it is simply a great science fiction novel whether or not you’re a Trekkie. The story begins with Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura, Sulu and Chekov blamed for the destruction of Talin IV, a planet under observation by Starfleet’s First Contact Office, but not yet contacted, because the observed culture is not quite advanced enough to join the Federation of Planets…even though the two dominant cultures on this world are on the brink of nuclear warfare. After an apocalyptic event, the Enterprise (spacecraft) is stuck in orbit with a nacelle (engine) gripped by a warp field that holds the vessel in place while slowly dissolving her mass. The investigations of what occurred on this planet are compelling, intellectually engrossing, and quite complex…and amongst the ‘hardest’ science fiction I’ve come across in the entire Star Trek franchise. Greg Bear’s ‘Forge of God’ and Arthur C. Clarke’s ‘Rendezvous with Rama’ are decent reference points for the type of scientific investigation found in this book. The authors even give some of the magic wand physics (such as warp speed) found in The Original Series a more scientifically grounded touch up. The discussions of the Prime Directive have the moral complexity and philosophical depth of the best TNG, DS9, and Enterprise episodes, and are equally engaging. Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura, Sulu, Chekov, and Scotty are written faithfully, which provides some humor and personal drama amidst all of the large-scale scientific and legal inquiries. Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens also spend time detailing how some new spacecrafts function (the anti-gravitic Wraiths are nicely engineered) and even the ethical boundaries of cloning a beloved pet. Plus, there’s an exciting and cleverly staged dogfight between two spacecrafts.
‘Prime Directive’ is a very smart science-fiction mystery with some real tension and many great sense of wonder images, and yet it’s a book that science fiction fans may overlook (or dismiss) because it’s ‘a Star Trek book.’ Frank Miller’s ‘The Dark Knight Returns,’ the ‘Hannibal’ television show, Alan Moore’s run on ‘Swamp Thing,’ Garth Ennis’ ‘Punisher’ MAX series, David Cronenberg’s remake of ‘The Fly,’ and many other works of art prove that subsequent incarnations of established intellectual properties can qualitatively eclipse the original incarnations, and such is the case with ‘Prime Directive,’ a Star Trek story that exceeds the very best shows found in The Original Series and compares to the franchise’s all-time best episodes, gems like ‘Dear Doctor’ and ‘Similitude’ (from Enterprise); ‘The Inner Light,’ ‘The Offspring,’ and ‘Clues’ (from The Next Generation); ‘Duet’ and ‘Children of Time’ (from Deep Space Nine); and ‘Tuvix’ and ‘Distant Origin’ (from Voyager). In this book, authors Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens went cleverly as well as boldly into the cosmic frontier.
(For interested Trekkies: Search for 'Favorite Star Trek episodes and fan films ranked by writer/director S. Craig Zahler' and you'll see a sizable list I've posted on I M D B)