Years ago, after getting my daily fix of 'calvin & hobbes', and needing to avoid doing my job for a few more minutes, i'd usually read doonesbury, be bored with it, and wonder why, as a progressive, i felt somehow obligated to appreciate it. then i'd usually move on to wonder who the fuck was left on earth who finds 'family circus' or 'little orphan annie' entertaining, how much power they must have, and a chill would penetrate my very bones.
was i not giving doonesbury a chance?
so, to correct my obvious deficiency, a comrade convinced me to check out Trudeau's first collection of strips from the late 60's and early 70's, and now i see why so many lefties got used to checking doonesbury out every day. overall, it stands up very well, and i imagine was more groundbreaking at the time.
My favorite arc is about the Vietnamese NLF fighter Phred befriending the reactionary U.S. jock-soldier B.D. and the gambit bringing mass numbers of Cambodian bombing victims to testify against the U.S. attacks before Congress. Joanie Caucus' revolt against her unhappy marriage and teaching feminist principles to her daycare class and her pursuit of law degree all expose the contradictions of being oppressed and the ironies are handled in a genuinely funny way. There's also the relentless mocking of the powerful's limitless capacity for hypocrisy exposed through government officials own testimony.
It was a nice world to hang out in for awhile.
Yet, living today through a time when it's grown obvious yet again to mass numbers of U.S. residents that our ruling class' prime industry is producing irony and horror, i'm disappointed to find the current strip boring.
oh well, it seems like it paved the way for commercial acceptance of gems like 'tom tomorrow' and 'the boondocks'.
now, how do we get rid of 'little orphan annie'?