In contrast to the novel that is so pat, so neatly wrapped at its conclusion that it can summed up and dismissed, there is that novel which is so complex or confusing that it continues for a while to pique, long after it is finished. These complex/confusing novels can also be dismissed, readers all too quick to fault the author for the reader’s own difficulties. At what point does one finally conclude that the failure is not the reader’s, but that the author simply went off the rails?
There was much that was interesting in Findley’s Pilgrim, but I was never able to make it cohere, which for a while was a good thing, as it forced me to recollect the several parts, made me wonder how they could be made to fit. I finally concluded after what I considered due diligence that the author had lost his way.
Madness and immortal spirits. Are they somehow linked? Findley would have us unite the concepts, to see that Pilgrim is not mad (he demonstrates that he can’t die, hence is immortal in some fashion), certainly not mad in the way the former ballerina Countess Blavinskeya is, believing herself queen of the Moon, trapped for a time on Earth. And there is Jung, trying to show that madness is only a response to reality that comforts and protects the individual. Does that apply to Pilgrim? Is Pilgrim delusional on the basis that he has failed to kill himself, thus believes himself to be an immortal soul? How does being an immortal soul prevent a mortal body from dying? And what of the succession of such mortal lives Pilgrim’s immortal soul has lived?
Jung and his wife: the infidelities, the miscarried child, the live-in mistress, the magic now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t image of Jung being fellated. This relation between Jung and wife is one of the most moving parts of the novel, but it little connects with Pilgrim’s frustrated efforts to die and to wake humanity. There are other instances and degrees of failed/thwarted love in the novel (Sibyl-Pilgrim, Forster-Pilgrim, Dora-Blavinskeya, Mona Lisa-Leonardo, Manolo-Teresa), and these may signal a theme that is connected with Pilgrim’s desire to kill himself. But how to tell?
The most logical thing is to assume, as does Carl Jung, that Pilgrim is mad, that he has constructed a world of delusion to escape reality. Instead, Pilgrim escapes the sanitarium. Does this make him sane, validate his efforts to wake humanity to its current inhumanity by destroying works of art? Just how does that work? And the final image of Jung, writing of a dream of Pilgrim handing him a brick… I did not see how that followed, that there was in the failures of Pilgrim and Jung such a message of hope.
There are some very good, well-written, well-drawn parts to this novel (characters, scenes, incidents), but I concluded finally that it was illogical and disjointed, that it lacked a unifying coherence.