Revolutions in the Atlantic World: A Comparative History

by Wim Klooster

In the late eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries, revolutions transformed the British, French, and Spanish Atlantic worlds. During this time, colonial and indigenous people rioted and rebelled against their occupiers in violent pursuit of political liberty and economic opportunity, challenging time-honored social and political structures on both sides of the Atlantic. As a result, mainland America separated from British and Spanish rule, the French monarchy toppled, and the world's wealthiest colony was emancipated. In the new sovereign states, legal equality was introduced, republicanism embraced, and the people began to question the legitimacy of slavery. Revolutions in the Atlantic World wields a comparative lens to reveal several central themes in the field of Atlantic history, from the concept of European empire and the murky position it occupied between the Old and New Worlds to slavery and diasporas. How was the stability of the old regimes undermined? Which mechanisms of successful popular mobilization can be observed? What roles did blacks and Indians play? Drawing on both primary documents and extant secondary literature to answer these questions, Wim Klooster portrays the revolutions as parallel and connected uprisings.

Genres: History, Nonfiction, European History, American History, American Revolution, 19th Century, 18th Century

248 pages, Paperback

First published May 1, 2007

Reviews

[Flynn Evans · Rating 3 out of 5]

A reliable, textbook-level synthesis and survey covering the Atlantic connections of the major eighteenth century revolutions.

[Liv (LivTheBookNerd) · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book was horrible to read. I *love* history. I find it absolutely facinating! I love my history classes and I love historical fiction along with nonfiction historical books, but this book was horrible. It was just so terribly written. The writer does not know how to write a cohesive historical analysis....I hated reading this book for my class.

[Tim West · Rating 2 out of 5]

Klooster comparison of the Atlantic Revolutions is an impressive work with well documented research put into the book. The amount of detail about the Revolutions he was able to punch in 40 page chapters was terrific. (175 pages overall)

As a person who came into this book knowing a good amount of background information on the American and French Revolutions I was still able to learn new things.

As a person who came into this book knowing very little about the Haitian and Spanish American Revolutions, I learned a lot that was very interesting. While I know these revolutions in general are a complicated piece of history, I felt after Klooster introduced the causes of these revolutions what followed was a jumbo of different names and constantly going back and forth which in result made it hard to follow at some points.

A challenging read for myself especially in the later chapters, but a solid work. The French Revolution chapter and the comparative chapter were my favorite chapters in the book.

Update months later: Since writing this review I have read multiple other history books. When I read this it was one of my first so I thought that it was me and all history books are like this. I do think this book was very academic and was harder to read and honestly a more rigorous read than others I have read. I did not enjoy it as much. Not to take away from the author because it still is an impressive work, but definitely background information and an academic history background would help reading this book.

[Julia · Rating 2 out of 5]

For an undergraduate class, this text would be an excellent springboard to help students understand the basics of understanding the 1760-1840 revolutionary period. However, the depth and detail just are not present, e.g. when describing Robspierre's fall from power. Literally, he just is not there, and that's it. This text does not have much to offer graduate students, with the exception of the Haitian Revolution. Klooster's chapter about the Haitian Revolution adds to the historiography of Haiti, is detailed, and avoids using any one particular lens with which to study Haiti. I appreciated Klooster's work in this chapter and thought it was the best chapter in the book. All the other chapters are too simple, are a compilation of the historiography versus being a unique viewpoint. This text does not even come close to being suitable graduate-level material.

[Eric · Rating 2 out of 5]

For me the book didn't really achieve what I hoped it would. The structure of the book is to provide an introduction with drawing connections between the revolutions; middle chapters with narratives of the American, French, Haitian, and Spanish American Revolutions; and then a conclusion again comparing the revolutions.

The middle chapters really fall short for me. They do not provide much in the way of comparison between the revolutions (which the title would lead one to hope). Some comparative themes and arguments exist but are not made very explicit. The middle chapters do provide okay summary narratives of these revolutions. The author's prose is fine to read. However, even as summary narratives these chapters detail too many twists, turns, and false starts to provide a good place for introduction.

If I was to do this book over again, I'd probably read the intro and conclusion chapters and skip the rest.

[Chris · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very good introduction to these revolutions and comparisons between them at a first year university/college level. When my copy first arrived I was disappointed at how short the sections on each revolution and the comparisons between them were, however, on reading them the author packs a lot of useful and interesting insights into each section. Recommended for anyone who wants a solid introduction to this topic by an historian who knows it well and writes in a clear, accessible way.

[Henry Terry · Rating 3 out of 5]

An informative book, his conclusions on the similarities and differences between the 4 revolutions are well presented and gives a good overview of them as well. Saves most of his comparisons for the end, should have discussed more in the individual chapters. One would need /some/ background knowledge but is a good entry level into the history

[Eren Buğlalılar · Rating 3 out of 5]

Rather dull and boring.

[Kaitlin I.]

This is the most iconic thing to include on my GoodReads honestly but I READ this textbook and annotated it from cover to cover so I’m counting it towards my reading goal.

[Cara Lynn]

Read for school

[K. G. Whitehurst · Rating 4 out of 5]

It's good for what it is--a textbook aimed at undergraduates. The text compares the main revolutions of the age of revolution, basically 1763 to 1821. It has a strong, well declared and supported thesis of several parts: 1) the revolutions cannot be understood outside the realm of international politics; 2) none of the revolutions was foreordained or inevitable (I mostly find this supposition true, tho' the American revolution starts to have an inevitable feel once one realizes the physical and political mechanisms for autonomy aren't there); 3) divided loyalties give the revolutions a feeling of civil wars as new populations enter the fray/s for their reasons (slaves, free persons of color, Indians, etc); 4) the revolutions do not represent any sort of triumphalism for democracy (a debunking of previous historiography). And for a textbook, it possesses a reasonably fast and lively narrative without bogging down in too many details.

[Lucio A. Bianchi · Rating 5 out of 5]

With Revolutions in the Atlantic World, Wim Klooster rejects the notion of the revolutions’ inevitability, underlining that they were not foreordained, and their success was not assured. By deconstructing this seeming invincibility, the author provides a more comprehensive and personal analysis of the ‘Age of Revolution’, shedding light on actors usually absent from the historiography. Overall, Klooster does a phenomenal job in reconstructing colonial society. The history from below approach works: not only does Klooster explain the larger forces at play at the dawn of the French revolution, but he clearly explains how disenfranchised groups like the urban poor and peasant farmers were directly affected by tax policy.

A great, historiographical triumph! Bravo.

[Jason S · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting and concise summary of the four Atlantic Revolutions. The comparative sections leave something to be desired.

[Colin]

This is an excellent comparison story. If you have a deep interest in the revolutions in the US, France, Haiti, and Latin America, this may be for you. If you are a teacher of AP World History, this is an outstanding read for us. I strongly encourage my fellow teachers to consider this one.