Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made available for future generations to enjoy.
What an incredible read! This account of how a green girl grows into a solemn, determined woman with demons and angels grabbing at her skirts as she navigates the commonplace cruelties of living life should be canon. Wrongly labeled as a sensuous romance and sensation novel by Victorian Secrets who republished it (in an otherwise wonderful critical edition); this is a very spiritual book with a morbidly beautiful central theme on the glory (or shame) of death and the afterlife. It also contains a very realistic, tender portrayal of a suicidal woman. It is one of my new favorites and I will forever hold it dearly to my heart.
I found this book mentioned in another book I read recently and knowing that I find gems this way, I had to read this story. I read this edition and I strongly recommend it, for many reasons besides the annotated which was excellent, it included the original version which has differences and a completely different conclusion. "Not Wisely" was published in serial form from DUM (Dublin University Magazine) but later was released in 3 volume format with changes. When reading I would read "x" number of pages and then look briefly at the changes which helped see the differences in the stories. The DUM version had the character of Dare more a brute and blackguard, whereas in volume 3, he was a rake but softened a bit. I liked the 3 volume better but the DUM version was quite shocking and good too. When reading this story it reminded me of Richardson's Clarissa Harlowe, a truly favorite of mine, but they are quite different. Kate, in Not Wisely must control her passions of Dare, who would like her to take the step unfooled, whereas Lovelace of Clarissa fools Clarissa into that "one step". Clarissa and Kate must decide do they want to be closer to heaven or walk a path of sin. Kate is not your typical Victorian heroine which makes her actions more interesting, and Broughton brings Kate to life. A story that is not easily forgotten.
DNF 36%. I'm sorry but this is just agonizing. The pacing is TERRIBLE. IDK why so many people make this out to be more scandalous than CUAAF when it's just noooot. So damn boring. I'm just going to read about it in secondary scholarship and call it a day.
Somehow this was not what I expected, especially since I knew its scandalous reputation. The narrator is odd, too: often ironic, going into lengthy musings on side topics, with lots of classical allusions, and also positioned as a character who knows the people intimately, and is in love with the main character, but who is never identified or explained. But the parts that deal with the heroine's interior life, and her reactions to things, are very vivid and well-realized. Maybe the generally detached tone provides a grounding background for the extravagant emotionalism, so it never comes off like an over-heated romance, but a character study of someone feeling extravagant emotions. So quite interesting, and and a good addition to your collection of novels about sex and romance in the 19th century. I'm sure you all have one.
For the novel itself, 3.5 stars. For the presentation of the book - the extended Introduction and the extensive (just under 700!) annotations - 4.5 stars.
difficult to read because of the writing (run-on sentences filled with unnecessary commas plus an omniscient narrator who pops up in the middle of the story for no reason.) but i appreciated the story for what it was.