I think the fact this book took me a little under a week to finish, despite being in a place where I have plenty of time to relax and put my feet up, should tell you everything. Sorry, Lucy Diamond (or Sue!), I was a big fan of "Over You" and "Sweet Temptation", maybe it's because this is one of your older books.
"Hens Reunited" follows three girls leading very different paths: Commitment-Phobe and Control-Freak Katie, Heartless but Glamorous Georgia; and my personal favourite Sweet, Cheated-On-By-A-Movie-Star-And-Betrayed-By-Georgia Alice.
It was a nice, cozy-themed sort of book, the kind I want to drink hot chocolate to and be snuggled in a blanket. I guess this was just the wrong time to read it, I just couldn't get into it. Unlike "Over You" and "Sweet Temptation", it was written from three different perspectives, going back to the past and present, and in third person. If you didn't already know, third person is my least favourite form of writing and, unfortunately, Lucy Diamond never pulled it off for me. Her writing style remained lovely, and refreshing, and light, but that was not enough.
The only real flaws in this novel that aren't me being picky with my morals was how predictable it was, and how slow the book went - a lot of what was going on seemed to me to be like filler, and not actual plot. It wasn't interesting enough, like her past books, to make me grab the book back up wanting more.
Now, on my moral side of things, there was a few things I had a problem with. Katie was almost shamed for not wanting marriage or a baby, her mother there and her past failed marriage there as an excuse or a reason as to why a woman would not want marriage or a baby. I understand that might just have been a plot-device for Katie, but because of Georgia's past it was clear that even someone like Georgia might end up having marriage and babies (but I'm going to think not, she didn't seem that type of person to me). Which just made me feel even more negatively towards Katie's situation. However, this is not an unusual situation in books like this one. Romance novels, written by men OR women, usually have a lot of common ideals in them that I don't agree with. For example, how kids are viewed in only a positive light and the writing makes it seem like it would be insane for a woman not to want one and must need a reason (in "Over You", Nell didn't want a baby because she was a career-driven woman and not because she didn't want a baby). That's a rant I best save for a close buddy, though, as it really doesn't matter in terms of the enjoyment of the book for other people, I'm sure.
I might give this a re-read in future, but personally, I don't think it was her best work.