Audiobook, and the first DNF for which I feel compelled to leave a review.
I really contemplated powering through the whole book in order to be able to leave a more thorough review, but thankfully, more than a few folks have done that before me (bless them). There are some really thoughtful, nuanced, critical reviews of this both here and on the NYT pieces about Sole-Smith. Anyway, the reason I didn't finish this book was that I would have been literally screaming and shaking my fist the whole time, and I simply don't have time or energy for that.
Here are the things Sole-Smith gets right, from the few chapters I listened to:
1. Anti-fat bias is a problem, and we experience it in all of the ways our societies are designed for people of all ages. Bodies of all sizes, abilities, ethnicities, genders, and every other dimension of difference deserve to be treated and valued equally, and our systems need to be designed accordingly.
2. Immense pressure is put on parents, particularly on mothers, to get it "right", especially when it comes to diet and feeding -- on top of all the other forms of labor they juggle.
3. The food environments that have been created particularly in the past 50-70 years with the rise of ultra-processed foods have raised inequality of access to nutrient-dense foods and led to corresponding, poor health outcomes.
4. People simply don't owe each other explanations for body size.
And here's just a short sample of Sole Smith's arguments that are irresponsible at best and downright dangerous at worst:
1. Teaching children to read nutrition labels = anti-fat bias.
2. The idea that a six-year-old who rapidly gained 40 lbs and has high cholesterol and fatty liver just magically did so, and his parents should be excused from responsibility for this.
3. Virtually no one chooses to exercise for enjoyment, especially forms of intense exercise. People exercise because anti-fat bias prevalent in society dictates that they need to lose weight.
4. The concept of child-sized portions = anti-fat bias.
5. Exploring why kids in more recent generations are fatter than those in our parents' and grandparents' generation is -- you guessed it -- anti-fat bias.
Anyway, as someone who has intentionally confronted my own anti-fat bias over the past few years, sought out many viewpoints when it comes to food, nutrition, and policies that affect our bodies, this was a series of viewpoints that I simply could not hear out due to all the statistical cherry-picking. It was like one giant bingo card of all the logical fallacies.
Anyway, tl;dr:
Anti-fat bias is a prevalent and dangerous issue.
The many chronic, preventable illnesses tied to excess overweight -- and the costs they have for all of us in the health care system -- are prevalent and dangerous issues.
But Sole-Smith's argument that the former is more grave than the latter is false. The facts simply don't bear that out.