The Indian’s Last Stand. A review by Colonel (ret) Mike Kershaw of The Last Indian War: The Nez Perce Story by Elliot West.
On Friday, 5 October 2018, my father and I visited the Bear Paw Battlefield, just south of Chinook, Montana. My father, a quarter Creek Indian, always wanted to visit this historic spot and our annual hunting bird trip to Montana gave us this unique opportunity. After spending two days bird hunting on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, we arrived in the early morning. Friday was the 140th anniversary of the day Chief Joseph surrendered to Colonel Nelson Miles and General Howard only 40 miles south of the Canadian border. Elliot West, a professor at the University of Arkansas, casts the flight and surrender of the non-treaty, Nez Perce bands, as a “Pivotal Moment in American History”. As part of this thesis, he casts the final subjugation of the Nez Perce as part of larger “Great Reconstruction” of America, occurring between, 1845-1878.
The tale of how 5 non-treaty bands of some 800 Nez Perce came into conflict with the US government has been told before. At the time, their epic movement of some 1200 miles, crisscrossing the continental divide, eluding and repeatedly besting their Army pursuers was followed at the time in the nation’s burgeoning press. Elliot casts the event in the larger context of an America coming to grips with a vast territorial expansion, centralization of political authority and a redefining of citizenship – what it meant to be ‘an American’. Elliot avoids the tendency among many contemporary authors to find convenient heroes and scapegoats to simplify his explanations. He also places decisions and decision makers in both the context of their respective cultures -- which had differing methods – and within the context of their times (not ours). As he follows the trek of the Nez Perce, he also explores various aspects of the history of the period, from diseases to religion, to the role of ‘mountain men’, the telegraph and of course, the Army.
Beginning with the Nez Perce’s initial contact with Americans, West follows their interaction with the rapidly expanding frontier culture. Among the first American’s they meet are the Lewis and Clark expedition, who lauded them for their friendship and critical support. The geography of their tribal lands – located in much of what is today central Idaho and portions of Washington State and Oregon – isolated them from many of the clashes that characterized the period. Like many tribes, they adopted the horse and traded for guns with the whites, which gave them increased mobility and lethality. However, these also established interactions which slowly eroded the isolation conferred on them by their geography and created concomitant dependencies. West points out that this insularity also made it difficult for them to understand the scope and scale of the people pushing around them and into their lands. While treaties, agencies and the Army sought to establish some form of equilibrium on the frontier, inevitably some economic impetus serve as a catalyst for conflict. West likens the mining concerns to an artillery piece lobbing a shell of ‘white’ presence into previously segregated tribal lands, in almost all cases leading to armed conflict.
West gives us a nuanced appreciation of leadership of the various non-treaty bands that formed the core of this story. He notes that the ‘treaty’ Nez Perce not only remain on their Idaho reservation but generally opposed a return of the non-treaty bands once exiled. He frames the famed Chief Joseph’s leadership in terms under which the tribes operated, constantly shifting leadership based on the situation and without a significant compulsory component. Tribal leaders led until their ‘medicine’ was seen as waning or, more commonly, until the situation demanded different leadership attributes. He points out that few engagements with the Indians last more than a day, in large part due to the shifting leadership among the tribes. The larger affect is that negotiations are consistently foiled as both government and Indian attempts at agreement and communication result in a form of ‘talking past each other.’ In fact, Joseph’s famous surrender speech, was mostly likely the liberal creation of a former member of the West Point Drama Club, a Lieutenant serving as aide de camp (Joseph spoke no English). I guess the Social Science Department hadn’t been created yet. Joseph’s skill, acknowledged among his tribe, were diplomatic and, much like Quanah Parker in Gwynn’s Comanche saga (Empire of the Summer Moon), proved critical in leading his people into a harsh exile.
Another challenge West brings to light is the constantly shifting relations between the non-treaty bands and the rest of the Nez Perce, the other tribes and white settlers (as it shifts between the settlers and the Army). Their flight over the continental divide and into present day Montana was largely based on an assumption that they would we welcomed or at least assisted by their Plains Indian brothers. Once Montana settlers realized the Nez Perce were in flight and not bent on fighting, they traded with them and left them somewhat to their own devices. The scattered military outposts were, for a period, outnumbered. But these alliances rapidly shifted – many settlers turned against them and their fellow tribes, particularly the Crows and Cheyenne, rejected their entreaties and, in most cases, actively assisted the Army in both tracking and pursuit. In fact, both the Assiniboine and Gros Ventures, the current inhabitants of Fort Belknap, harried the fleeing Nez Perce as their remnants fled toward Canada. This highlights again, the lack of understanding the Nez Perce had with the world outside their tribal areas.
The Army, as Peter Cozzens points out in his The Sky is Weeping, although often cast as the Indians foe, more commonly served as the armed arbitrator between the tribes and the encroaching civilian settlers. Defunded by an economically challenged government and over-tasked with Reconstruction duty, the Army was chronically undermanned and outnumbered in their attempts to enforce the various treaties. Negotiations, primarily through Indian agents, therefore lack the force of authority to prevent white encroachment, a constant source of frustration for the tribes. Like most authors, West focuses on the senior Army leaders – Howard, Gibbon, Sturgis and Miles – in this account. Crook, Gibbon and others are variously quoted noting the Indian superiority in most combat engagements. The Indians individual superiority as warriors derived from their method of warfare, largely based on ‘counting coup’ or stealing horses from other tribes, actions which emphasized the individual nature of their combat. This produced warriors with incredible individual skills but played against collective action, particularly in extended engagements. The bands simply couldn’t afford to take casualties, with their requirement to protect both their village (the women, children and elderly) as well as their horses. The episodic nature of tribal warfare and the practice of taking hostages mitigated these issues and ensure tribal conflict while violent, rarely resulted in large numbers of casualties and could rapidly shift between conflict and relative peace. The US Army was a foe who would give them no rest. The Army’s practice of war was political and based on collective action -- discipline used to overcome casualties and ensure endurance. To overcome the gap in tactical proficiency, the Army used Indian Scouts and contractors (usually former Soldiers or settlers). West even falls into this trap – citing examples of Nez Perce superior marksmanship and target discrimination when he recounts leader casualties for the Army but the deaths of Indian leaders are almost always attributed to their initiative and bravery. In the Bear Paw engagement, the Nez Perce lost 3 of their 5 key leaders to either fire from the Army or fratricide – Joseph and only one other Indian Chief of any authority (White Bird) remained. This clearly impacted Joseph’s decision (or the tribes) to surrender.
Much as the non-treaty Nez Perce gain a reputation as they repeatedly confound the Army, the units which confront them represent a wide spectrum of the Frontier Army. Howard is an ill-starred officer with a mixed reputation from the Civil War, certainly not a favorite of the post war Army. Miles and Gibbon are Infantry Officers somewhat out of place amongst the Cavalry dominated officer corps which directed most of the campaigns against the Indians. In fact, the column led by Miles, an officer whose naked ambition inspired great hatred among his peers, is a polyglot of experienced Cavalry, hastily mounted Infantry and three companies of the 7th Cavalry which had been left behind when their Regiment (under the command of Colonel Sturgis, who’d lost a son with the 7th with Custer) set off on campaign. Recently reconstituted after the disaster at Little Bighorn the year previous, this much maligned rump battalion (the ‘Custer Avengers’) will lose all of their officers but one in the encounter. As a professional Soldier, it was sobering to look at the plaque bearing the names of the US Army Soldiers killed in action at the Bear Paw and realize that these 3 Companies lost 18 of the 23 killed – including all 3 First Sergeants -- while the more experienced 2d Cavalry and 5th Infantry (7 Companies between them) lost only 5. One thing the final action at the Bear Paw demonstrates is that, regardless of what side you were fighting on, it’s the ‘fighting’ or small-unit leaders that take the bulk of the casualties in close combat. Casualties, as an old Soldier once told me, don’t lie. This doesn’t refute the competency of the individual Nez Perce warrior in combat and horsemanship – he and his Plains Indian brothers earned their well-deserved reputations by hard riding and fighting. However, in the end, it’s the ability of these much maligned companies, which press the attack after their initial repulse, to put the Nez Perce in a dilemma they couldn’t overcome – a decision on whether to protect their encampment (and their women and children) and their horse herd. In the end, harried and tracked by Cheyenne Scouts, and the relentless advance of a driven and ambitious commander, the Nez Perce meet ‘their Waterloo’ at the Bear Paw. Ironically, it will be Colonel Nelson Miles, who rises to be the highest ranks in the Army, who lobbies on their behalf throughout their exile, to little effect.
West’s book includes an impressive bibliography for those who are more interested in this epic tale. I was interested to learn, for example, that the Nez Perce trail, which today marks the route they followed through Montana, passed just to the east of the town of Winifred, where we have hunted the past ten years. This past Saturday, representatives of the Nez Perce gathered at the Bear Paw Monument to memorialize the event. I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the flight of the Nez Perce or the Indian Wars of the Northwest.
(photos unavailable)
Capt (ret) and COL (ret) Kershaw at the Bear Paw Battlefield, 5 Oct 2018. According the marker of US Army casualties at the site, these Soldier’s graves were moved to the Little Bighorn Battlefield Cemetery.