dnf @ around 65%. I had so many problems with this. I don't think I've ever been more disappointed to give a book two stars, but I also haven't disliked a book this much in a LONG time. some of the essays were really great and memorable, but they were absolutely few and far between. most of this book was chock-full of the most overt virtue signaling I have ever seen, self-deprecating comments about the author's privilege, and writing that sounded like a cringey instagram infographic had been turned into a book. the insertions of some social justice movements were incredibly inappropriate for the topics at hand, others were just misplaced.
the essays were all over the place and the author was just directly quoting other activists without any fresh takes on ANYTHING most of the time. I went into this book expecting a nuanced discussion about bisexuality, culture, stereotypes, and dating, and got literally everything but that. this book was also a victim of the "buzzfeed writing" phenomenon. the endless footnotes were so hard to keep up with and half the time didn't add anything meaningful, and the asterisks were so hard to find that half the time I would have no idea what the footnotes were referencing. a good third of the book was just the author's dating and sex history, which was... fine? overall, the whole voice of the book just felt disconnected and overused, the same buzzwords seen in every millennial article being used instead to talk about how privileged and woke the author is. other reviewers have mentioned the virtue signaling in this book, but it truly is overwhelming. the author spends half the book talking about how she can't speak on issues because she's privileged and the other half speaking on those issues.
there was one part that solidified the dnf-ing for me, when jen was talking about lesbians in media and said that femme lesbians "rely on heteronormativity," quoting another writer who said that they "reinforce the idea that lesbians are 'just like us', in other words, heterosexual." on the VERY next page jen says that there are "so many ways to be gay" as if she didn't just directly invalidate a way to be gay. I'm all for discussions of representation in media, especially within the lesbian community, but the context and wording of this part made me a TINY bit livid. I get the point of it, but the execution fell so flat. which was, actually, how I felt about the book as a whole.
I don't hate the idea of this book, and there were parts of it I really did like. I think telling queer stories is incredibly important. but I also think this is going to age terribly- not just because of the references to memes and the impersonal writing, but also just because of some of the takes. I'd be interested to read what jen writes next, but I'm not rushing to recommend this one to anybody. if it worked for you, that's amazing. this book and I just really did not click.