A well-written work of historical fiction (although I wouldn't go as far as calling it a thriller),
Hour of the Witch
is engaging and deals with a topic that still reverberates with meaning. Chris Bohjalian takes us to Boston in the 1660s and delving into the perilous difficulties - often fatal - of being a woman, a nonconformist, an outsider, a progressive, or a person with an open mind in a Puritanical society, and without a heavy hand lets the reader make inferences and connections to current gains and entrenched misogyny and structural barriers for women in society. This is a women as witch book, not a book of magic, and it's a great character study and the heroine, Mary, was both relatable and seemingly very true to her time and background: a strong believer in God and the Devil, fearful for her soul and questioning of her intentions and motivations, but also a believer in herself, understanding and challenging the cruelty and inhumanity of her husband's violence against her, and growing in understanding and compassion of others over the course of the novel.
So having said all of that, why am I only rating this three stars? First, while this is my first time reading something by Chris Bohjalian, it's definitely not my first foray into Salem-esque fiction and nonfiction looking at the witch hunts in the colonies and in Europe. And this is a good and worthy entrant into the category, but I don't think it brought anything new to the landscape. I also think that there was even less brought to bear on the psychological motivations of the accusers, because here those who condemned Mary had intimate, specific, and small reasons for doing so, rather than some of the more complex understandings of say the accusers and witnesses in the Salem witch trials. I think in
Hour of the Witch
whether we look at the male or female accusers and witnesses, the motivations are not deeply complex. And when most of this book revolves around Mary's trials, to only have the bulk of the psychological profile completed only for Mary and Thomas seemed like a miss.
I also think that Bohjalian's foreshadowing device interrupted some of my enjoyment of the novel and ultimately did too much to telegraph what was going to unfold.
Hour of the Witch
headlines each chapter with testimony from Mary's trials, giving the reader an early preview of what is to come. While this can be a really neat device that builds tension, atmosphere, or adds to the mystery and the desire to solve it, its use here served the opposite for me. Because I knew certain things were going to unfold and Mary would get to certain points in the narrative, some of the tension and mystery of the unknown would abate. The clinical quoting of testimony reduced the atmosphere and potential eeriness Bohjalian might have been inculcating. And typically, you want the device to be brought back once the reader catches up with it in the narrative, but in a new or slightly different way, or a way that puts the pieces together for the characters and/or reader and reveals something unexpected. That definitely doesn't happen here: the fragments that foreshadow come up in the narrative as they are meant to and reveal no more or less than what they did as earlier headlines. This ended up aggravating and disappointing me and detracted a bit from my enjoyment of the novel because I knew a bit too much about what was going to happen.
Ultimately, I liked this book and thought it was solid, well-written and researched, and presented us an interesting and complex character in Mary whose thoughts, desires, bravery and fears I really appreciated getting to know and spend time with. But I think the narrative and storyline was not as strong as it could have been, both because of predictability and self-spoilering and because we didn't get the same degree of complexity for most characters outside of Mary, and at least from my readings of fiction and nonfiction dealing with witch hunts, it's the interplay between accusers and accused within the society and the complex human impulses that was most fascinating and horrifying. So I'd give this 3.5 stars, rounded down to 3 stars. I would recommend it to those that like historical fiction and psychological studies of characters, and I am looking forward to reading more of Bohjalian's work in the future.