People talk so much vile crap about Rush that I almost feel like I should be wearing a HAZMAT suit when I read one of his books. Personally, I see him as being one of the most misunderstood public figures in the country. The general media has done such a good job of painting him out to be the devil incarnate that many people are immediately willing to believe the very worst about him simply out of hand. Most of the negative reviews on these kind of websites are written by people who felt they could just skim the book's first chapter and be done with it. How do I know this? Because virtually none of them criticize any of the specific points Rush makes; rather, they denounce the book as simply being "stupid," or vote it onto the "Books I'd Rather Die than Read" list. I would like to know what people are so afraid of that they'd rather die than read a particular book (and, yes, I realize they are not meaning it literally, except perhaps in the case of Twilight--which I'm allowed to joke about like that because I actually read it with the intention of trying to enjoy it). But Rush is a bigot, you say, and there can never be any allowances made for bigotry. I say, show me an example of that! What, "Feminazi?" The Limbaugh Lexicon at the back of the book defines the term "Feminazi" as being "widely misunderstood by most to simply mean 'feminist'...A Feminazi is a feminist to whom the most important thing in life is ensuring that as many abortions as possible occur. There are fewer than 25 known Feminazis in the United States." So, the term applies to less than 25 people in the U.S.? Is that REALLY so offensive? The same goes for "Environmentalist Wackos," which Rush defines as being "fringe kookburgers and not to be confused with serious and responsible ecology-minded people." But why read this book with an open mind, right? Let's compare those labels with the term "Teabaggers," which is more explicitly offensive and is applied to millions of people throughout the country. Yet it provokes little or no outrage among the same people that complain about the labels that Rush comes up with. Were those people offended when Anderson Cooper said, "It's hard to talk when you're Teabaggin'..." I really doubt it. And that's what I can't stand: the blatant hypocrisy that so many people don't even realize they are engaging in. I can understand hating Rush and liking Bill Maher, for example; but I can't understand being OFFENDED at Rush and yet totally ok with Maher. Especially when it comes to this book, which may be partisan, but doesn't insult the intelligence of those on the other side of the fence. Sure, Rush gets a couple things wrong (IMHO, the age of the earth--too old--and the belief that, for practical reasons, it's always a bad idea to try to work outside the two party system), but he writes his own book without a team of ghostwriters and presents his ideas intelligently and with a passion than many people wrongly believe to be manufactured. "Stupid" does not apply here, and I'm tired of that word being thrown about so carelessly all the time. I'm tired of hearing how every well-known conservative is more stupid than the last...enough already! When I was a kid, Ronald Reagan was the epitome of stupid until Dan Quail came along. Dan Quail was then made out to be the dumbest person who ever lived until George W. Bush came along and bested him (and even beat Reagan in the evil category!). Then Sarah Palin shocked the world by being even dumber than Bush, which no one thought possible. Could anyone possibly be even dumber than Palin? Well, it turns out the answer is yes. And not too surprisingly it's Michelle Bachmann, the next conservative that liberals feel threatened by. And I'm sure whoever ends up running against Obama will turn out to be even dumber than her. So...let's see...what else bothers people about Rush. I hear a lot about how arrogant he is, but anyone who reads him without assuming he's a total nutjob windbag can see that all these instances of "arrogance" are simply a facet of his sense of humor which is lost on people looking for nothing more than reasons to hate him. If you don't want to get his humor, then you definitely won't--which is always the case with nuanced humor. Rush, sitting astride his "Prestigious Attila the Hun Chair," often "demonstrates absurdity by being absurd." Listening to him joke with angry listeners on the radio (like the time he talks about in the book where he claimed he had found a Satanic message lurking in the background of his show's theme song) reminds me of Sacha Baron Cohen interviewing people on Da Ali G Show and being taken seriously by smart people with no clue they were being made the butt of an elaborate joke. This careful interweaving of topical issues and blatant satire is what I like about Rush, and what I also like about Jon Stewart. I just wish more people would calm down and try to appreciate Rush for what he is, not what people generally make him out to be. So, sit back with this book and enjoy... It's a lot more topical than you'd expect from such an old book, and there's a lot of autobiographical stuff if you're curious about how he got his start in talk radio. It's not as good as See, I Told You So, but definitely a hearty read, nonetheless.