What do you think?
Rate this book


375 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1986






Rui Barbosa believes in the law, and bases his belief on erudite quotations from imperial Romans and English liberals. But he doesn't believe in reality.For a lengthy time, inadvertently and otherwise, I've plowed through the list of the 1001 Books Before You Die. I've numbered the living, burned the dead, and continue to dream of a day when I've read enough that I can, in good conscience, create my own. There will be many recognizable derivatives from other eulogized lists, both official and otherwise, but I've developed my palate enough in the areas of the languishing and the deprived that the only places to go are both far away and underground, and even those works that have already been raised up in more rarefied air will breath true fresh air in a land where they are not the only one of their kind. Eduardo Galeano seems to have written Memory of Fire with that burden in mind, and today, I can finally set his work into its rightful place of being amongst my personal esteemed bests. The reading, however, does not stop there. I looked up a mere five or so of the many artists who lived and perished between these pages, and, between this and the first two volumes, there are hundreds of others that may spark something in an unaware reader who doesn't understand the origins of Day of the Dead beyond what has been taught to them by Disney and the Anglicized Pope. I know that it has sparked a fire in me.
None admit to having killed anybody; but then, like them, poverty doesn't exactly sign its name to its crimes either.
[B.] Traven decides to be a mystery, so that no bureaucracy can label him. All the better to mock a world where the marriage contract and inheritance matter more than love and death.I'm going to admit here that I wasn't totally behind my five star rating for volume two of this trilogy, as I still have a shakier grasp on the nebulous 1750-1899 region covered by Faces and Masks than I would like. I undeniably came to this realization while near effortlessly, in comparison, traversing this work, as it seemed that I knew every one, if not two to three, out of every five names mentioned, and some of the more famous ones popped up multiple times in unfamiliar yet easily acknowledged positions in time and space. Monroe, Kahlo, Allende, Luxemburg, Castro, Trotsky, Edison, Panama, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Dominican Republic: people and places that I've slowly but surely accumulated as a record of need to know, more than supplemented by the gaze of the flaming eye that obsesses not over the hippies and wars overseas when so much is won and lost and disemboweled right here, within the confines of nations and towns and indigenous civilizations who Prometheuseanly suffer to the tune of anti-communism. I've been told to look at history when it comes to the excesses of that particularly collectivism, and here in this book, I have, and many of the dictatorships set up in anti-communist opposition by past incarnations of Amazon and Walmart brutalized long before Mao. That is not the only theme, but it is a persistent one, and these days, amidst the dying down of news about US concentration camps and the rise of talk of US impeachment, I wonder what other hypocrisies will be birthed, and whether another will have to step into Galeano's shoes in the future, should the world not rend itself to pieces beforehand.
For the opposition, Senator Borah denies his country's right to act as the censor of Central America, and Senator Wheeler suggests that the government send Marines to Chicago, not Nicaragua, if it really wants to take on bandits. The Nation magazine, for its part, takes the view that for the U.S. president to call Sandino a bandit is like George III of England labeling George Washington a thief.
Neruda roams the Spanish earth so soaked in blood and is transformed. The poet, distracted by politics, asks of poetry that it makes itself useful like metal or flour, that it get ready to stain its face with coal dust and fight body to body.This year has been a good one for five star ratings, which gives me hope that I'm finally clearing out most of the peer pressured layers and developing a true sense of what I prefer in my reading. I'm still not comfortable enough to do anything more than dip into the collection of white boy writing I have in storage, but I could make exceptions for some of my favorites, who I read so long ago that my love for them could use a far more contemporary evaluation. Galeano has survived in my estimation since 2014, and I still have at least one more read of his waiting for me till the time is right. I expect all authors that I love to meet similar standards of literary longevity, and I have been unsparing in my criticism of many who fell from my grace upon a renewed perusal. This book opened a world for me that I still barely perceive despite my conscious efforts directed towards 'balanced' reading, and it would be a pleasure to track down the names of unfamiliar authors and see what all the fuss, lodged largely in books not yet translated into English, is about. For now, I leave Galeano, but only as long as it takes others to find him and revel.
The war accepts blacks, thousands and thousands of them, but not the Red Cross. The Red Cross bans black blood in the plasma banks, so as to avoid the possibility that races might mix by transfusion.
The research of Charles Drew, inventor of life, has finally made it possible to save blood. Thanks to him, plasma banks are reviving thousands of dying men on the battlefields of Europe.
When the Red Cross decides to reject the blood of blacks, Drew, director of the Red Cross plasma service, resigns. Drew is black.
The scientist Albert Einstein appeals to intellectuals to refuse to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee and to be prepared for jail or economic ruin. Filing this, believes Einstein, the intellectuals deserve nothing better than the slavery which is intended for them.
Stubbornly, Trotsky continues to believe in socialism, fouled as it is by human mud; for when all is said, who can deny that Christianity is much more than the Inquisition?
First we'll kill all the subversives. Then we'll kill the collaborators. Then the sympathizers. Then the undecided. And finally, we'll kill the indifferent.