What do you think?
Rate this book
Love from London #1
Mr. Pickwick's Guide to Marriageable Young Ladies
London, 1824
When a scandalous pamphlet begins circulating, it upsets the entire social game. Above the turmoil rises one question...Who is Mr. Pickwick?
A man who doesn't care for society...
There's very little that the wealthy Duke of Devonshire worries about, but his family is an exception. There's nothing Edward won't do for those he loves...
A lady who is good at being invisible...
Lady Eleanor Gilbert is beneath society's notice, and that's exactly how she likes it. The last thing she wants is for a Duke to look her way. After all, she has many secrets, and attention is dangerous...
An unseen menace that could destroy them both...
Will Edward and Eleanor be able to overcome the secrets they keep and the danger that faces them?
When a scandalous pamphlet begins circulating, it upsets the entire social game. Above the turmoil rises one question...Who is Mr. Pickwick?
A man who doesn't care for society...
There's very little that the wealthy Duke of Devonshire worries about, but his family is an exception. There's nothing Edward won't do for those he loves...
A lady who is good at being invisible...
Lady Eleanor Gilbert is beneath society's notice, and that's exactly how she likes it. The last thing she wants is for a Duke to look her way. After all, she has many secrets, and attention is dangerous...
An unseen menace that could destroy them both...
Will Edward and Eleanor be able to overcome the secrets they keep and the danger that faces them?
471 pages, Paperback
First published March 31, 2020
522 people are currently reading
898 people want to read
About the author
Jill M. Beene
17 books213 followersBe sure to follow me on Goodreads to get every update! I live in sunny California with my handsome husband and my slobbery English Mastiff, Rupert. I've always loved stories and wanted to write novels. When I'm not getting words on the page, I'm walking my dog or cooking something (hopefully) delicious. Feel free to ask me a question or connect with me here, but you can also find me on Instagram or my website, JillMBeene.com. I so appreciate my readers! Thank you!
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 186 reviews
June 17, 2020
I was suckered into the purchase of this by the title and the book cover. And somewhat by the favorable reviews. Unfortunately, it didn't live up to any of this.
This is not the first novel by this author but it is the first historical romance. The author is American and doesn't seem to be very knowledgeable about language, behavior and titles in 1800s England. Perhaps her research consisted of reading other historical romance novels, especially those by other clueless Americans?
How to use titles and directly address members of the peerage can be a mystery to us Americans. However, the mystery can be cleared up with a bit of online research. Well, it wasn't cleared up here. All the female characters, married or single, were addressed and referred to as Lady "Firstname", but it is only unmarried females who will be a Lady Millie or Lady Eleanor, etc., and only those who are daughters of dukes, marquesses, or earls. (For example, our unmarried heroine, as the daughter of a baron, should not have been Lady Eleanor at all, but rather Miss Gilbert. And her married acquaintances should not have been Lady Millie or Lady Anne, but rather Lady Milton and Lady Sheffield.) Misuse throughout the book was truly annoying.
Another thing: No duke of the 1800s would, if he had an illegitimate child, invite guests to a dinner and have that child seated at the table with the guests. As a matter of fact, he wouldn't have his legitimate children there. They would be with the nanny or governess. This is just one example of the author's lack of interest in learning about socially acceptable behavior of the time period of the book.
What else annoyed? Vocabulary choices. Such as, "a bunch of ladies", "anyways", "welp", "schlumpy", etc. Well, my annoyance with these anachronisms did lead to my learning that the substandard, regional expression "anyways" has been around for more than 800 years. Who knew? Nonetheless, no reason to use it here and it was used multiple times.
Okay. I need to calm down. I'm supposed to be reviewing the story, right? But, if I ignore all the above annoyances, it still is not a good read. There is nothing very original about the plot, the characters are shallowly developed, and the dialogue is dull. There's even an abduction towards the end. That's such a tired device.
That abduction reminds me to complain about the Evil Woman in this story. I failed to see how a duke, in such a high position in society, could have in any way felt threatened by this person. I guess we just needed a baddie in the story, no matter the logic of this one.
All righty, then. I'm a cranky old lady. But that book's title and its cover had me thinking it would be a cute read. Lesson learned. Never assume.
This is not the first novel by this author but it is the first historical romance. The author is American and doesn't seem to be very knowledgeable about language, behavior and titles in 1800s England. Perhaps her research consisted of reading other historical romance novels, especially those by other clueless Americans?
How to use titles and directly address members of the peerage can be a mystery to us Americans. However, the mystery can be cleared up with a bit of online research. Well, it wasn't cleared up here. All the female characters, married or single, were addressed and referred to as Lady "Firstname", but it is only unmarried females who will be a Lady Millie or Lady Eleanor, etc., and only those who are daughters of dukes, marquesses, or earls. (For example, our unmarried heroine, as the daughter of a baron, should not have been Lady Eleanor at all, but rather Miss Gilbert. And her married acquaintances should not have been Lady Millie or Lady Anne, but rather Lady Milton and Lady Sheffield.) Misuse throughout the book was truly annoying.
Another thing: No duke of the 1800s would, if he had an illegitimate child, invite guests to a dinner and have that child seated at the table with the guests. As a matter of fact, he wouldn't have his legitimate children there. They would be with the nanny or governess. This is just one example of the author's lack of interest in learning about socially acceptable behavior of the time period of the book.
What else annoyed? Vocabulary choices. Such as, "a bunch of ladies", "anyways", "welp", "schlumpy", etc. Well, my annoyance with these anachronisms did lead to my learning that the substandard, regional expression "anyways" has been around for more than 800 years. Who knew? Nonetheless, no reason to use it here and it was used multiple times.
Okay. I need to calm down. I'm supposed to be reviewing the story, right? But, if I ignore all the above annoyances, it still is not a good read. There is nothing very original about the plot, the characters are shallowly developed, and the dialogue is dull. There's even an abduction towards the end. That's such a tired device.
That abduction reminds me to complain about the Evil Woman in this story. I failed to see how a duke, in such a high position in society, could have in any way felt threatened by this person. I guess we just needed a baddie in the story, no matter the logic of this one.
All righty, then. I'm a cranky old lady. But that book's title and its cover had me thinking it would be a cute read. Lesson learned. Never assume.
February 23, 2025
2 stars (2 for content, 3.5 for plot—but I can't overlook the content) ✨ Clean Fiction - Regency (minor curses + sexual innuendos)
I really liked the writing style, particularly the prologue, and a lot of the plot. That said, I did have to dock this book because of language and sexual hints/comments.
Despite our main characters not having the best morals (her with the lying and him with the ordering of his staff to break into places for answers), I did like them both well enough. The plot was interesting and grabbed my attention. I really liked how Edward fell first for her, even if I didn’t quite love the “she’s not like the other girls he’s been around” element.
I do think there may have been some liberties taken with historical details/words used, which didn’t distract me fully away from the plot, but did make me question some things.
Unfortunately, I was disappointed by the cussing (probably not a big deal to most, but I didn’t care for it) and the sexual innuendoes/comments throughout the book. This definitely affected my rating because had those parts not been in it, I probably would have given this book 4 stars. Content wise it was a 1.5/2 for me. I’m bummed about that, but oh well! It is what it is. I’ll be checking out the next book in the series though with hopes it might be a little bit cleaner for my tastes. 😅
Main Content-
Mentions of churches, church going, pastors/vicar (one is called long-winded), & services (it’s implied Eleanor doesn’t go, but dresses like she does on Sundays); A mention of Edward praying (but not said to Whom); A mention of a woman saying grace during a small (and mixed gender) social gathering; A mention of Lent; A mention of religious anthologies; A mention of fate (which Eleanor says she doesn’t believe in).
Language: 1 ‘piss’ (for urine), 2 ‘bastard’ (literal sense of an illegitimate child), 4 ‘whore’ and 10 forms of ‘damn/damned’; Eleanor wants to tell someone to “go to the devil”; Other phrases like “Good heavens”, “for heaven’s sake”, and “thank the heavens above” are said; Eleanor calls her family’s life “hell” because of a certain woman; Eye rolling & Sarcasm; Some women talk meanly and are catty to other women (particularly if they are jealous or think the other woman isn’t pretty); Eleanor lies and sometimes feels guilt (she also flatters people for information, faking interest in them or what they are saying); Edward orders for his men to break into places (including Eleanor’s home); Both Edward and Eleanor drink (socially, by themselves, and after a shock).
Seeing dead/shot bodies, Gunshots, Being kidnapped, being tied-up, being knocked out, passing out, injuries, pain, (up to a handful of sentences).
Many mentions of gossip & rumors; Mentions of deaths (including of loved ones); Mentions of kidnappings, ransoms, nightmares of it, potential brutal deaths, injuries, & thugs (up to a couple sentences); Mentions of wars & battles; Mentions of duels; Mentions of fires & being trapped in one; Mentions of thieves, stealing, & stolen items; Mentions of alcohol, drinking, drunks, & taverns; Mentions of lies & lying; Mentions of throwing up & vomit; A few mentions of criminals being shipped overseas; A few mentions of someone being drugged; A few mentions of gambling & poker; A few mentions of body waste; A couple mentions of wanting to see someone hanged; A couple mentions of women who died in childbirth; A couple mentions of carriage accidents; A couple mentions of women who were ahead of their time with wanting women’s rights; A mention of a young lady that hit/abused her maid.
4 head/forehead kisses,
2 kisses lasting a couple sentences,
1 kiss lasting 5-7 sentences,
Remembering kisses (up to a couple sentences); Wanting to kiss (up to a couple sentences); When kissing Edward, Eleanor understands how some ladies were lead astray.
Touches, Embraces, Dancing, Tingles/Shivers, Butterflies/Flutters, Warmth, Nearness, Noticing, Staring, & Smelling (including Edward noting that Eleanor smells “soft and sensual”, up to a few sentences); Wanting to touch & embrace (up to a couple sentences); Jealousy; Flirting & Blushes.
Eleanor isn’t sure which would be worse, living in an abbey or a brothel (the brothel, probably, but she couldn’t decide, thinking on it a bit more); Edward’s friend, Percy, comments about his father warning him of “the power of a good bosom in a pretty dress”; Eleanor and her friends discuss a man’s very used barouche & there’s some sexual innuendos due to his womanizing ways; Eleanor recalls how she used to think about forcing a lord to be caught in a compromising situation with her, but because she has no male family members left, she is concerned that she “might find herself divested or her virginity, or worse yet—pregnant, without anything to show for it”; A man comments that the worst women are often the most “prodigious breeders”; Edward believes that a child shouldn’t be hold to blame for the circumstances surrounding his birth; A man comments on being willing to marry another man for his fortune (teasing).
Edward has spread the rumor that his younger half-brother is actually his son to protect the boy (*Spoilers* ); *Spoilers about possible sexual assault* .
It’s commented about a duchess being much younger than her husband (her twenty-five and him seventy), producing him an heir and spare, and then never returning to their bedroom; Women are called whores, harlots, harpies, and hussies.
Mentions of rape/sexual assault & a man planning to do it to women that he steals from (implied he did it already once and will do it again); Mentions of a rumor about Edward “philandering” with a servant and it resulting in an out of wedlock pregnancy (illegitimate, bastard, “by-blow”, and “born on the wrong side of the sheets” are all used); Mentions of women who are whores (prostitutes); Mentions of a young woman arriving back home in disarray (and proud of it), someone commenting that the man was known to her “in the Biblical sense”, and an engagement coming from it; Mentions of kisses & kissing; Mentions of flirting & seducing; Mentions of reputations & chaperones; A few mentions of the Harris’ List that rates ladies of the night (including a comment about rating the “parts of a lady covered by her dress” and their “bedroom talents”); A few mentions of women being ruined; A few mentions of women being send to confinement for out of wedlock pregnancies; A few mentions of jealousy; A couple mentions of affairs; A mention of a barmaid being dressed with her buttons all the way up and probably hidden away at nighttime (so that she won’t be bothered by the dockhands and sailors); A mention of a woman not having male visitors to her room; A mention of a womanizer/“well-known deflowerer”; A mention of a man’s “house” being big (possible sexual innuendo); A mention of a mistress; A mention of wives with children bragging to wives without children about their ability to breed; A mention of a discarded set of stays being found in a garden shed after a party; A mention of a woman trying to draw attention to her ample bosom; A mention of a wife not allowing a beautiful young governess in her home; A mention of Edward walking into Eleanor’s room and seeing her undergarments thrown about.
At the end of the book, the author shares about human trafficking and organizations that help fight that and pornography. (I appreciated the awareness shared, but it did feel a little out of place because the book didn’t have those as topics discussed. But when you have a passion and a platform, you use it, so I can’t fuss about bringing more people aware to it all.)
I really liked the writing style, particularly the prologue, and a lot of the plot. That said, I did have to dock this book because of language and sexual hints/comments.
Despite our main characters not having the best morals (her with the lying and him with the ordering of his staff to break into places for answers), I did like them both well enough. The plot was interesting and grabbed my attention. I really liked how Edward fell first for her, even if I didn’t quite love the “she’s not like the other girls he’s been around” element.
I do think there may have been some liberties taken with historical details/words used, which didn’t distract me fully away from the plot, but did make me question some things.
Unfortunately, I was disappointed by the cussing (probably not a big deal to most, but I didn’t care for it) and the sexual innuendoes/comments throughout the book. This definitely affected my rating because had those parts not been in it, I probably would have given this book 4 stars. Content wise it was a 1.5/2 for me. I’m bummed about that, but oh well! It is what it is. I’ll be checking out the next book in the series though with hopes it might be a little bit cleaner for my tastes. 😅
Main Content-
Mentions of churches, church going, pastors/vicar (one is called long-winded), & services (it’s implied Eleanor doesn’t go, but dresses like she does on Sundays); A mention of Edward praying (but not said to Whom); A mention of a woman saying grace during a small (and mixed gender) social gathering; A mention of Lent; A mention of religious anthologies; A mention of fate (which Eleanor says she doesn’t believe in).
Language: 1 ‘piss’ (for urine), 2 ‘bastard’ (literal sense of an illegitimate child), 4 ‘whore’ and 10 forms of ‘damn/damned’; Eleanor wants to tell someone to “go to the devil”; Other phrases like “Good heavens”, “for heaven’s sake”, and “thank the heavens above” are said; Eleanor calls her family’s life “hell” because of a certain woman; Eye rolling & Sarcasm; Some women talk meanly and are catty to other women (particularly if they are jealous or think the other woman isn’t pretty); Eleanor lies and sometimes feels guilt (she also flatters people for information, faking interest in them or what they are saying); Edward orders for his men to break into places (including Eleanor’s home); Both Edward and Eleanor drink (socially, by themselves, and after a shock).
Seeing dead/shot bodies, Gunshots, Being kidnapped, being tied-up, being knocked out, passing out, injuries, pain, (up to a handful of sentences).
Many mentions of gossip & rumors; Mentions of deaths (including of loved ones); Mentions of kidnappings, ransoms, nightmares of it, potential brutal deaths, injuries, & thugs (up to a couple sentences); Mentions of wars & battles; Mentions of duels; Mentions of fires & being trapped in one; Mentions of thieves, stealing, & stolen items; Mentions of alcohol, drinking, drunks, & taverns; Mentions of lies & lying; Mentions of throwing up & vomit; A few mentions of criminals being shipped overseas; A few mentions of someone being drugged; A few mentions of gambling & poker; A few mentions of body waste; A couple mentions of wanting to see someone hanged; A couple mentions of women who died in childbirth; A couple mentions of carriage accidents; A couple mentions of women who were ahead of their time with wanting women’s rights; A mention of a young lady that hit/abused her maid.
4 head/forehead kisses,
2 kisses lasting a couple sentences,
1 kiss lasting 5-7 sentences,
Remembering kisses (up to a couple sentences); Wanting to kiss (up to a couple sentences); When kissing Edward, Eleanor understands how some ladies were lead astray.
Touches, Embraces, Dancing, Tingles/Shivers, Butterflies/Flutters, Warmth, Nearness, Noticing, Staring, & Smelling (including Edward noting that Eleanor smells “soft and sensual”, up to a few sentences); Wanting to touch & embrace (up to a couple sentences); Jealousy; Flirting & Blushes.
Eleanor isn’t sure which would be worse, living in an abbey or a brothel (the brothel, probably, but she couldn’t decide, thinking on it a bit more); Edward’s friend, Percy, comments about his father warning him of “the power of a good bosom in a pretty dress”; Eleanor and her friends discuss a man’s very used barouche & there’s some sexual innuendos due to his womanizing ways; Eleanor recalls how she used to think about forcing a lord to be caught in a compromising situation with her, but because she has no male family members left, she is concerned that she “might find herself divested or her virginity, or worse yet—pregnant, without anything to show for it”; A man comments that the worst women are often the most “prodigious breeders”; Edward believes that a child shouldn’t be hold to blame for the circumstances surrounding his birth; A man comments on being willing to marry another man for his fortune (teasing).
Edward has spread the rumor that his younger half-brother is actually his son to protect the boy (*Spoilers* ); *Spoilers about possible sexual assault* .
It’s commented about a duchess being much younger than her husband (her twenty-five and him seventy), producing him an heir and spare, and then never returning to their bedroom; Women are called whores, harlots, harpies, and hussies.
Mentions of rape/sexual assault & a man planning to do it to women that he steals from (implied he did it already once and will do it again); Mentions of a rumor about Edward “philandering” with a servant and it resulting in an out of wedlock pregnancy (illegitimate, bastard, “by-blow”, and “born on the wrong side of the sheets” are all used); Mentions of women who are whores (prostitutes); Mentions of a young woman arriving back home in disarray (and proud of it), someone commenting that the man was known to her “in the Biblical sense”, and an engagement coming from it; Mentions of kisses & kissing; Mentions of flirting & seducing; Mentions of reputations & chaperones; A few mentions of the Harris’ List that rates ladies of the night (including a comment about rating the “parts of a lady covered by her dress” and their “bedroom talents”); A few mentions of women being ruined; A few mentions of women being send to confinement for out of wedlock pregnancies; A few mentions of jealousy; A couple mentions of affairs; A mention of a barmaid being dressed with her buttons all the way up and probably hidden away at nighttime (so that she won’t be bothered by the dockhands and sailors); A mention of a woman not having male visitors to her room; A mention of a womanizer/“well-known deflowerer”; A mention of a man’s “house” being big (possible sexual innuendo); A mention of a mistress; A mention of wives with children bragging to wives without children about their ability to breed; A mention of a discarded set of stays being found in a garden shed after a party; A mention of a woman trying to draw attention to her ample bosom; A mention of a wife not allowing a beautiful young governess in her home; A mention of Edward walking into Eleanor’s room and seeing her undergarments thrown about.
At the end of the book, the author shares about human trafficking and organizations that help fight that and pornography. (I appreciated the awareness shared, but it did feel a little out of place because the book didn’t have those as topics discussed. But when you have a passion and a platform, you use it, so I can’t fuss about bringing more people aware to it all.)
June 7, 2021
Mr. Pickwick's guide has sent the whole London society in an uproar with its scandalous content. It prints reviews on each young marriageable lady stating their character and the fate of the man were he to marry her. People from the high society can't wait to get their hands on Mr. Pickwick including Edward who is worried about his long kept secret. Eleanor hates attracting attention after her family's disgrace, and keeps a low profile, but things get complicated when the pamphlet throws her into Edward's path and she comes under scrutiny.
I had very high expectations while starting this book and it did NOT disappoint. Once I started, I couldn't put it down and devoured the book in a matter of hours. Now I regret it because I want to read more.
It's full of humor, wit and fun. The characters are simply marvellous! Eleanor is strong and independent despite her circumstances, and I loved her. Edward is the perfect male protagonist with his compassion and the ability to see people for who they truly are.
The supporting characters are equally well-written and help to move the story forward.
I enjoyed the banter between the main characters and laughed so many times.
The plot has been executed well and it sucked me in completely. The detailed description helped me get an idea about the time it was set in, which is 1824, and how things worked then.
The ending had a lot of action which left my heart pounding as I wondered what would happen next, and I was very satisfied with the outcome.
The book has suspense, slow-burn romance, comedy, some drama and my review does not do justice to it.
I recommend it to all who enjoy historical fiction. You're definitely missing out on something awesome if you don't read it.
I had very high expectations while starting this book and it did NOT disappoint. Once I started, I couldn't put it down and devoured the book in a matter of hours. Now I regret it because I want to read more.
It's full of humor, wit and fun. The characters are simply marvellous! Eleanor is strong and independent despite her circumstances, and I loved her. Edward is the perfect male protagonist with his compassion and the ability to see people for who they truly are.
The supporting characters are equally well-written and help to move the story forward.
I enjoyed the banter between the main characters and laughed so many times.
The plot has been executed well and it sucked me in completely. The detailed description helped me get an idea about the time it was set in, which is 1824, and how things worked then.
The ending had a lot of action which left my heart pounding as I wondered what would happen next, and I was very satisfied with the outcome.
The book has suspense, slow-burn romance, comedy, some drama and my review does not do justice to it.
I recommend it to all who enjoy historical fiction. You're definitely missing out on something awesome if you don't read it.
May 7, 2021
I will explain why I didn't 5 star this wonderful, wonderful book...
I do appreciate stories that employ humor and a great writing skill. While I'm not one to enjoy romances or regencies, I gotta say, the premise of the story was so clever (and not pushed back for the romance, which I appreciated - it served more as a background). The language could've used some work, as I'm not entirely sure that's how regency people spoke back then, but suspension of belief! :) Also, I really loved the writing, the friendships, the characters, and the pacing and plotting of the book. Seriously, it was amazing.
BUT. Well, okay. Objectively, I can say the romance was well done. And I AM very happy that what I thought was stalking turned out to be explained better. Still, I didn't like the romance so much... I'm not generally fond of instant attraction, but more than that, while I liked the hero as a character, I thought his romantic advances were a bit shady at times. (Certainly I get why he INITIALLY did some things. I'd have overlooked them if his intentions hadn't become so murky...). But still, the hero and heroine had great banter. And I just loved how everyone interacted with one another, not to mention how a flighty and sometimes thoughtless woman was shown that she could be a genuine friend. (Kudos to the great rep of different types of women in some of the asides)
All in all, golden book that my cranky, unromantic self couldn't completely five star. Still, BIG recommend!
Content: Talk of sexual scandals, a scene where a man intends to take advantage of a woman, some heavily veiled jokes and mild language...but clean all in all. Oh, and the author does put a PSA at the end to raise awareness for trafficking and the like
I do appreciate stories that employ humor and a great writing skill. While I'm not one to enjoy romances or regencies, I gotta say, the premise of the story was so clever (and not pushed back for the romance, which I appreciated - it served more as a background). The language could've used some work, as I'm not entirely sure that's how regency people spoke back then, but suspension of belief! :) Also, I really loved the writing, the friendships, the characters, and the pacing and plotting of the book. Seriously, it was amazing.
BUT. Well, okay. Objectively, I can say the romance was well done. And I AM very happy that what I thought was stalking turned out to be explained better. Still, I didn't like the romance so much... I'm not generally fond of instant attraction, but more than that, while I liked the hero as a character, I thought his romantic advances were a bit shady at times. (Certainly I get why he INITIALLY did some things. I'd have overlooked them if his intentions hadn't become so murky...). But still, the hero and heroine had great banter. And I just loved how everyone interacted with one another, not to mention how a flighty and sometimes thoughtless woman was shown that she could be a genuine friend. (Kudos to the great rep of different types of women in some of the asides)
All in all, golden book that my cranky, unromantic self couldn't completely five star. Still, BIG recommend!
Content: Talk of sexual scandals, a scene where a man intends to take advantage of a woman, some heavily veiled jokes and mild language...but clean all in all. Oh, and the author does put a PSA at the end to raise awareness for trafficking and the like
November 26, 2025
This was fun to read! The gossip pamphlet aspect reminded me of Bridgeton (without spice). Oh, Edward, the man that you are. 🤌 This was the historical romance comfort read I wanted. 😌 Some Regency romance novels have a “strong woman ahead of her time who defies social customs” that ends up just being annoying and rude, but I did not find that to be the case here. Home girl was a strong woman who just did what she could to survive and was still very thoughtful. The bit of suspense was good, too. I’d probably read it again and want to read the next book in this standalone series.
Spice level: kisses only, girl friends make a couple of innuendoes
Language: very mild (a few d***)
Trigger warnings: abduction, character (bad guy) has thoughts of SAing another character, references to a relative having a mistress
Spice level: kisses only, girl friends make a couple of innuendoes
Language: very mild (a few d***)
Trigger warnings: abduction, character (bad guy) has thoughts of SAing another character, references to a relative having a mistress
October 3, 2024
Refreshing!
This was a good solid four. I loved the characters and it was well written. I recommend this book if you like more realistic historical books. The book is clean, which is rare. I realized that there is another book connected to this one, and to read in order read this one first. Title “ Mr. Salisbury’s Ledgers on how to Woo a Wife”
This was a good solid four. I loved the characters and it was well written. I recommend this book if you like more realistic historical books. The book is clean, which is rare. I realized that there is another book connected to this one, and to read in order read this one first. Title “ Mr. Salisbury’s Ledgers on how to Woo a Wife”
February 20, 2021
Enjoyable clean regency. I would love to read more with these characters, especially Percy and Candace.
August 30, 2025
A new favorite author! In her first Regency romance, Beene gives us Eleanor. She is a typical resourceful heroine dealing with poverty and a sad family situation. In a nod to Mrs. Whistledown, Eleanor decides to write and print Mr. Pickwick’s Guide to Marriageable Young Ladies. However, the twist is that she focuses on the characters of these women rather than just gossip. She is providing a public service as the ton practices for marriage matching does not provide time or opportunity to really get to the each other. Eleanor’s brother was a victim of this.
Edward is a Duke. Being a Duke might be better than being King: most of the privileges (murder can be made acceptable) and considerably less scrutiny. But Edward is a good guy apparently not driven by hormones. Everyone is up in arms about the new scandal sheet but Edward is not concerned. His sister is already married! But wait, there’s the problem of his father’s byblow whom he is raising as his own son, as his father passed on, so that he could raise him. A bit scandalous and Edward worries that the boy’s mother will not remain silent even after being paid off. She is not a nice lady. Plus his best friend Percy is worried about his sister Candace in her first season. Percy convinces Edward that they must find Mr. Pickwick!
So, Eleanor, quietly residing in Cheapside and try to avoid notice soon becomes a potential suspect, but is also surprisingly interesting! What emerges is a very entertaining cat and mouse relationship between the two. Beene excels at banter! The sly discussion between Edward and Eleanor about soup preferences is hilarious! The other thing Beene excels at is characters. All the characters are well defined and fun, with the possible exception of the bad guys who are well drawn but 2 dimensional.
The plot relies on standard romance tropes, but it never slows and is always compelling. I’m looking forward to the next book!!
Update: Thoroughly enjoyed the audiobook as well!!
Edward is a Duke. Being a Duke might be better than being King: most of the privileges (murder can be made acceptable) and considerably less scrutiny. But Edward is a good guy apparently not driven by hormones. Everyone is up in arms about the new scandal sheet but Edward is not concerned. His sister is already married! But wait, there’s the problem of his father’s byblow whom he is raising as his own son, as his father passed on, so that he could raise him. A bit scandalous and Edward worries that the boy’s mother will not remain silent even after being paid off. She is not a nice lady. Plus his best friend Percy is worried about his sister Candace in her first season. Percy convinces Edward that they must find Mr. Pickwick!
So, Eleanor, quietly residing in Cheapside and try to avoid notice soon becomes a potential suspect, but is also surprisingly interesting! What emerges is a very entertaining cat and mouse relationship between the two. Beene excels at banter! The sly discussion between Edward and Eleanor about soup preferences is hilarious! The other thing Beene excels at is characters. All the characters are well defined and fun, with the possible exception of the bad guys who are well drawn but 2 dimensional.
The plot relies on standard romance tropes, but it never slows and is always compelling. I’m looking forward to the next book!!
Update: Thoroughly enjoyed the audiobook as well!!
December 14, 2020
Author Uses a Romance Novel to Campaign Against Porn?
Um, do you know the typical use of romance novels.... the end of the novel is ruined by a campaign insert implying that pornography leads to child trafficking, etc. As a former trafficking survivor, I am appalled. Romance novels ARE porn for ppl who are romantically inclined. They provide sexy stimulation for people who crave romantic attraction. The novel was cute, each chapter had a gossipy printing that was as fun to read as the story. Too bad my mood was completely blown...what a way to kill a glow.
And as I believe romance is porn, and as I enjoyed the book very much, I can think of no greater complement to the author than to do EXACTLY as they wish and not support them. They will get one star and I won’t be purchasing their book as I had originally planned (I got to read it free on Unlimited). Maybe next time people will actually talk to trafficking survivors instead of trying to save us from imaginary monsters. Save me from saviors.
Um, do you know the typical use of romance novels.... the end of the novel is ruined by a campaign insert implying that pornography leads to child trafficking, etc. As a former trafficking survivor, I am appalled. Romance novels ARE porn for ppl who are romantically inclined. They provide sexy stimulation for people who crave romantic attraction. The novel was cute, each chapter had a gossipy printing that was as fun to read as the story. Too bad my mood was completely blown...what a way to kill a glow.
And as I believe romance is porn, and as I enjoyed the book very much, I can think of no greater complement to the author than to do EXACTLY as they wish and not support them. They will get one star and I won’t be purchasing their book as I had originally planned (I got to read it free on Unlimited). Maybe next time people will actually talk to trafficking survivors instead of trying to save us from imaginary monsters. Save me from saviors.
April 20, 2024
"It was a rare friend, indeed, who would take one’s hand and wade through the murky waters alongside you."
I don't read a historical romance often, but OMG, if Jill writes it, I WILL READ IT! She is the queen of witty banter. Mr. Pickwick's Guide to Marriageable Young Ladies is lovely, sweet, and full of funny moments. If you love books set in 1820s of London society, read it! Edward and Eleanor are absolutely adorable together. Now on to book 2!
And of course, I picked the Duke as Henry Cavill's character from Enola Holmes 🥰🥰🥰
“This is the problem with throwing a ball--everyone thinks that means you are interested in socializing. Or worse--getting married.” “A woeful idea, indeed, Your Grace.”
I don't read a historical romance often, but OMG, if Jill writes it, I WILL READ IT! She is the queen of witty banter. Mr. Pickwick's Guide to Marriageable Young Ladies is lovely, sweet, and full of funny moments. If you love books set in 1820s of London society, read it! Edward and Eleanor are absolutely adorable together. Now on to book 2!
And of course, I picked the Duke as Henry Cavill's character from Enola Holmes 🥰🥰🥰
“This is the problem with throwing a ball--everyone thinks that means you are interested in socializing. Or worse--getting married.” “A woeful idea, indeed, Your Grace.”
August 1, 2020
A friend asked my thoughts on this book. I really liked it. The story about a young lady forced to live apart from Society where she was raised by the loss of her father and her brother. She could have become a governess or a companion, but most turned their backs on her. No male family member and a small annuity, what was a girl to do? How about write the truth of the people she knew?
I loved that not only did Eleanor expose the truth of some of the worst traits of the ladies in society, but shined a light on the ones that were looked over.
Really good book. I liked it, maybe even loved it.
I loved that not only did Eleanor expose the truth of some of the worst traits of the ladies in society, but shined a light on the ones that were looked over.
Really good book. I liked it, maybe even loved it.
August 19, 2021
Sweet and fun.
I laughed several times in this. Really fun light read with great characters. I enjoyed the banter. Even though there was insta-love, it didn’t feel forced.
I laughed several times in this. Really fun light read with great characters. I enjoyed the banter. Even though there was insta-love, it didn’t feel forced.
July 2, 2021
A decent read but an odd mix
I found parts of this book very entertaining and thoughtful. In fact, you could see a lot of the author and her cares about human suffering and the have nots/prejudices in society then (and now). However, she keeps it fairly light so it doesn't hit you over the head with it. I don't know how many books she's written or where this falls in the line up. It has potential but some places just bogged down. The story initially shows her life among the "common folk" and friendships with her maids that get dropped once she snares the duke's attentions. It felt almost like a betrayal of all that she had realized and learned about the life outside of her sheltered, well to do upbringing. Then at the end she brings it back around that she uses her time to help others. But only in the way that I assume the aristocrats did help those who worked their lands (food baskets, etc). Noblesse oblige and all that. Nothing that I really thought of as above and beyond what would be a duchess' obligations unless she was a complete harpy. Still, 3 stars for the author's closing thoughts on human trafficking.
I found parts of this book very entertaining and thoughtful. In fact, you could see a lot of the author and her cares about human suffering and the have nots/prejudices in society then (and now). However, she keeps it fairly light so it doesn't hit you over the head with it. I don't know how many books she's written or where this falls in the line up. It has potential but some places just bogged down. The story initially shows her life among the "common folk" and friendships with her maids that get dropped once she snares the duke's attentions. It felt almost like a betrayal of all that she had realized and learned about the life outside of her sheltered, well to do upbringing. Then at the end she brings it back around that she uses her time to help others. But only in the way that I assume the aristocrats did help those who worked their lands (food baskets, etc). Noblesse oblige and all that. Nothing that I really thought of as above and beyond what would be a duchess' obligations unless she was a complete harpy. Still, 3 stars for the author's closing thoughts on human trafficking.
October 13, 2025
Good, but…
I wanted to like this novel than I did. The writing is very strong, but there were times I felt as if I was being hit over the head with the same information. Eleanor was plucky and brave, but I didn’t need her moralizing quite as much as she did. I will certainly read this Author again as she’s obviously talented.
I wanted to like this novel than I did. The writing is very strong, but there were times I felt as if I was being hit over the head with the same information. Eleanor was plucky and brave, but I didn’t need her moralizing quite as much as she did. I will certainly read this Author again as she’s obviously talented.
February 17, 2022
So romantic!
This story had such a sweet romance. I loved Eleanore’s independent character. The Duke was such a dashing figure. The background characters were well fleshed out. It’s an enjoyable read.
This story had such a sweet romance. I loved Eleanore’s independent character. The Duke was such a dashing figure. The background characters were well fleshed out. It’s an enjoyable read.
September 24, 2025
Really a 4.5–not perfect but excellent. One whole star was for the soup conversation. We lost at least half a star for a little too much love at first sight. For him anyway. A great meet-cute. Still not true love.
January 11, 2022
I don't know how I powered through to the end on this one - so many things about this story irritated me.
May 23, 2025
Such a fun time
January 29, 2026
A delightful book. Looking forward to reading the others in this series.
February 4, 2026
This was a fun book to read. I enjoyed it and would recommend it if you like Regency romances. There are past scandals to their families that add to the plot. Spice? Kissing. That is it. The length of the book was just right.
July 6, 2024
4.5
This was so very good and the banter was intelligent. I loved various points about this book. And both characters had well rounded personalities. Loved this.
This was so very good and the banter was intelligent. I loved various points about this book. And both characters had well rounded personalities. Loved this.
January 3, 2026
This was so cute!!! And the epilogue is literally what I want from every epilogue ever, a beautiful summary of their lives after the matter. I feel satisfied after that epilogue and content with the way things played out.
April 8, 2021
It was ok, just kind of cliche.
First of all, Henry is supposed to be Edward and Eleanor's son (or at least be raised like a son) but we see him all of twice. After his birthday, Henry is literally never mentioned AT ALL. It felt like Henry was only in the story at all just to further the romance, and I was really really excited to see more of Henry and Eleanor interacting. Just having Henry be completely MIA the rest of the story took a whole star off of this book because children are precious, even fictional ones.
Speaking of children being precious, WHAT was that random insert at the end of the book?? Yes, child trafficking is horrible but you do not go about ending that by telling people "stop watching porn, that leads to child trafficking but even if it didn't scientific studies show there are bad effects of watching porn anyway". I tried so hard to see how the author tried to relate it to the actual story, and the only thing I can see is
Anyway, this is my opinion, y'all. Overall I did enjoy the romance and but these were some of the big problems that I had with this book.
First of all, Henry is supposed to be Edward and Eleanor's son (or at least be raised like a son) but we see him all of twice. After his birthday, Henry is literally never mentioned AT ALL. It felt like Henry was only in the story at all just to further the romance, and I was really really excited to see more of Henry and Eleanor interacting. Just having Henry be completely MIA the rest of the story took a whole star off of this book because children are precious, even fictional ones.
Speaking of children being precious, WHAT was that random insert at the end of the book?? Yes, child trafficking is horrible but you do not go about ending that by telling people "stop watching porn, that leads to child trafficking but even if it didn't scientific studies show there are bad effects of watching porn anyway". I tried so hard to see how the author tried to relate it to the actual story, and the only thing I can see is
Anyway, this is my opinion, y'all. Overall I did enjoy the romance and but these were some of the big problems that I had with this book.
March 13, 2025
I like romances set in Regency very much and as the blurb sounded interesting I began reading. Unfortunately disappointment began soon. The plot reminded me of Julia Quinn's Bridgerton series, the only difference that part of the information came from housemaids the rest from the heroine and later it was a newspaper which fed the rumors. There were many inconsistencies and faults in the plot , the author didn't do her research properly.
I nearly stopped reading after the first chapter: rumors might have started from a maid who took the book from her employer's room and read it to the other servants in their free time. Apparently the author has no idea of customs in this time, most servants were illiterate, had hardly any spare time and would never take anything from their employer's room. The repercussions were too severe at a time where staff was easy to replace. To meet with maids after church in a pub is also incredible.
Naming every female Lady ignores the strict rules of form of adress: only daughters of earls, marquesses and dukes were entitled to Lady Mary, Elisabeth..., once married wives of barons, viscounts, earls and higher peers were Lady+husband's surname. Daughters of mere viscounts and lower peers were simple Miss+surname as the oldest, Miss Mary etc for younger sisters. As Eleanor's father had been a baron she was a simple Miss and not Lady Eleanor.
After a while I got bored with the heroin's inner monologue what could have been without the scandal, what life she should have, how condescending her friend treated her. Why didn't she take a position as a paid companion or a governess?
Around 30% the scandal is described but I didn't get it. Her brother's wife spent the fortune, that happened often among the peerage. Why didn't Eleanor have a dowry?
Around 40% I dnf, my time is too valuable to continue reading a bad book with an unlikable heroine
I nearly stopped reading after the first chapter: rumors might have started from a maid who took the book from her employer's room and read it to the other servants in their free time. Apparently the author has no idea of customs in this time, most servants were illiterate, had hardly any spare time and would never take anything from their employer's room. The repercussions were too severe at a time where staff was easy to replace. To meet with maids after church in a pub is also incredible.
Naming every female Lady ignores the strict rules of form of adress: only daughters of earls, marquesses and dukes were entitled to Lady Mary, Elisabeth..., once married wives of barons, viscounts, earls and higher peers were Lady+husband's surname. Daughters of mere viscounts and lower peers were simple Miss+surname as the oldest, Miss Mary etc for younger sisters. As Eleanor's father had been a baron she was a simple Miss and not Lady Eleanor.
After a while I got bored with the heroin's inner monologue what could have been without the scandal, what life she should have, how condescending her friend treated her. Why didn't she take a position as a paid companion or a governess?
Around 30% the scandal is described but I didn't get it. Her brother's wife spent the fortune, that happened often among the peerage. Why didn't Eleanor have a dowry?
Around 40% I dnf, my time is too valuable to continue reading a bad book with an unlikable heroine
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
March 25, 2021
Maybe my new favorite regency novel
As far as regency novels go, I've read my fair share and enjoy the genre, but there are some common tropes and emphases I find wearying. That said, I very much enjoyed this regency romance novel! The plot was original and interesting. There were some common tropes: plucky heroine down on her luck, wealthy and powerful hero (of course), and an element of physical danger in the rising action/climax (I'm trying not to be too spoilery). These tropes were well done and enhanced the story. I love the idea behind Mr. Pickwick! Such a fun concept to introduce to the meat--ahem, marriage market. I very much enjoyed the dialogue, especially between Eleanor and Edward--particularly when he's baiting her and her temper flares. Such fun. And the conversations about soup, foxes, and hounds--I very much enjoyed those. ;)
Anyway, I loved that this book was cute and a bit fluffy, but also not just that. There is meat and serious themes and issues raised--and not in a beating around the bush sort of way which seems common in books about "polite society". This will probably be a book a reread if craving a bit of regency romance. It's so good! Definitely recommend to fans of the genre.
(Also, side note: props to the author for writing both excellent young adult fantasy and regency romance. I first read--and loved--a Sharpened Axe and decided to give this one a try, since I enjoy the genre but was a little leery with the genre change since they're pretty different. Don't know why I was worried, with her writing and storytelling it obviously would turn out great! I'm definitely going to check out some of her other books!)
As far as regency novels go, I've read my fair share and enjoy the genre, but there are some common tropes and emphases I find wearying. That said, I very much enjoyed this regency romance novel! The plot was original and interesting. There were some common tropes: plucky heroine down on her luck, wealthy and powerful hero (of course), and an element of physical danger in the rising action/climax (I'm trying not to be too spoilery). These tropes were well done and enhanced the story. I love the idea behind Mr. Pickwick! Such a fun concept to introduce to the meat--ahem, marriage market. I very much enjoyed the dialogue, especially between Eleanor and Edward--particularly when he's baiting her and her temper flares. Such fun. And the conversations about soup, foxes, and hounds--I very much enjoyed those. ;)
Anyway, I loved that this book was cute and a bit fluffy, but also not just that. There is meat and serious themes and issues raised--and not in a beating around the bush sort of way which seems common in books about "polite society". This will probably be a book a reread if craving a bit of regency romance. It's so good! Definitely recommend to fans of the genre.
(Also, side note: props to the author for writing both excellent young adult fantasy and regency romance. I first read--and loved--a Sharpened Axe and decided to give this one a try, since I enjoy the genre but was a little leery with the genre change since they're pretty different. Don't know why I was worried, with her writing and storytelling it obviously would turn out great! I'm definitely going to check out some of her other books!)
June 20, 2021
Absolutely wonderful
This was a witty, clever, and lovely book. Eleanor is the secret writer of Mr. Pickwick’s Guide , a hilariously witty review of all of the ladies of the Season. Those entries at the beginning of each chapter were genius. I loved Eleanor. She’s so sweet, clever and caring of others. And Edward is clever and witty, besides handsome. My favorite parts are when they’re talking about “soup”, which was really about men—so funny- and when Edward kept putting his knee closer and closer to her on the couch and she kept moving over. The only mistake I noticed was that in one chapter, Edward’s sister tells a group of ladies that Eleanor will be spending Easter with them, but the next chapter in the fictional newspaper it said Christmas, and then later it says Easter again. Someone might want to fix that. Other than that, this book was just about perfect. I especially enjoyed the epilogue.
This was a witty, clever, and lovely book. Eleanor is the secret writer of Mr. Pickwick’s Guide , a hilariously witty review of all of the ladies of the Season. Those entries at the beginning of each chapter were genius. I loved Eleanor. She’s so sweet, clever and caring of others. And Edward is clever and witty, besides handsome. My favorite parts are when they’re talking about “soup”, which was really about men—so funny- and when Edward kept putting his knee closer and closer to her on the couch and she kept moving over. The only mistake I noticed was that in one chapter, Edward’s sister tells a group of ladies that Eleanor will be spending Easter with them, but the next chapter in the fictional newspaper it said Christmas, and then later it says Easter again. Someone might want to fix that. Other than that, this book was just about perfect. I especially enjoyed the epilogue.
September 30, 2023
Hmm…
While the plot has possibilities, the book is poorly written, with inaccurate period details including usage of titles and turn of phrase. Every female is “Lady [First Name]” even if in the next sentence she is referred to as a Miss. The main character is unlikeable, characterized by meanness of spirit, which shows in her unkind thoughts towards a friend who, while silly, has taken her under her wing. In another chapter, the main character muses that the only reason she did not choose to entrap an unsuspecting gentleman in marriage is because she had no family to force said gentleman to marry her after she compromised him.
In the end, the incongruent language and petty characters grated too much for me to keep reading past the half-way mark.
While the plot has possibilities, the book is poorly written, with inaccurate period details including usage of titles and turn of phrase. Every female is “Lady [First Name]” even if in the next sentence she is referred to as a Miss. The main character is unlikeable, characterized by meanness of spirit, which shows in her unkind thoughts towards a friend who, while silly, has taken her under her wing. In another chapter, the main character muses that the only reason she did not choose to entrap an unsuspecting gentleman in marriage is because she had no family to force said gentleman to marry her after she compromised him.
In the end, the incongruent language and petty characters grated too much for me to keep reading past the half-way mark.
September 15, 2024
The concept of this story is nothing new, it's basically Bridgerton's Lady Whistledown, just not done well. Lady Whistledown has actual motives and creativity, whereas the motive for Mr. Pickwick is so underwhelming, it makes no sense. At one point the main guy credits Mr. Pickwick for being witty, and nowhere did I see that wit in any of the entries. In terms of inoriginality, I thought the 2nd book was a carbon copy of Bridgerton and Pride and Prejudice. Well, this is pretty much the same. The Duke has 2 homes, one in London called Netherton Hall (sounds very similar to Netherfield Hall, Bingley's rented country manor in P&P) and one in the country called Chatsworth (Mr. Darcy's estate is called Chatsworth irl). And the story isn't unique or refreshing, it's so bland that I don't really feel much for it at all.
Furthermore, I had issues with the main concept itself. Mr. Pickwick chooses to write about every unmarried lady in the ton basically to warn other men from entering an imprudent marriage, just like their brother's failed one that led to his death. And yet we go on to talk about gender inequality and women being forced to marry and settle down just to preserve a title, security, and comfort in the 1800s. Why would you put all single females on blast and make it harder for them to get married, especially for the ones that received a "negative review" (as if she's a product), when the single men are spared?? Why aren't we doing entries for both? Protect women from known male abusers, predators, gold diggers, and the like? Just bc your brother married the wrong woman?? And at no point did anyone point this out to Mr. Pickwick, it just became a side hustle in the end that never stopped.
Another thing that bothered me was the language and historical inaccuracy. Ofc it's hard to be historically accurate, if there's even such a thing, but the titles and ways people were addressing the peerage showed a lack of research. Plus the writing was quite weak, in terms of a heavy focus on dialogue and not plot, and major repetition. The characters frown, raise an eyebrow, and blush so much they might've been cartoon characters. At one point Eleanor was confused about a question someone asked and she pretty much frowns AND tilts her head. It's so unnatural. We need to place them in the scene, make them do something with their bodies, instead of just facial expressions. Not to mention lots of typos (Marquess and Marchioness of Millen seem not to have a consistent title, because it changes from Millen to Millon to Milton throughout).
I can go on as well about how the characters are not that special, some side characters never get mentioned again once the romance starts, Eleanor harps on about how she understands poverty and is friends with the maids, but then they're only there to help her get gossip, and how grief was mentioned in the beginning but also never explored again, etc. All of this just means the author needs to work a lot more on her writing style, plot, character building & motivations, and pacing. A good and original romance story is in there somewhere, it just needs a more experienced hand. And definitely a better editor if there was one. I'll still watch out for her future works, but this one was just meh for me.
Furthermore, I had issues with the main concept itself. Mr. Pickwick chooses to write about every unmarried lady in the ton basically to warn other men from entering an imprudent marriage, just like their brother's failed one that led to his death. And yet we go on to talk about gender inequality and women being forced to marry and settle down just to preserve a title, security, and comfort in the 1800s. Why would you put all single females on blast and make it harder for them to get married, especially for the ones that received a "negative review" (as if she's a product), when the single men are spared?? Why aren't we doing entries for both? Protect women from known male abusers, predators, gold diggers, and the like? Just bc your brother married the wrong woman?? And at no point did anyone point this out to Mr. Pickwick, it just became a side hustle in the end that never stopped.
Another thing that bothered me was the language and historical inaccuracy. Ofc it's hard to be historically accurate, if there's even such a thing, but the titles and ways people were addressing the peerage showed a lack of research. Plus the writing was quite weak, in terms of a heavy focus on dialogue and not plot, and major repetition. The characters frown, raise an eyebrow, and blush so much they might've been cartoon characters. At one point Eleanor was confused about a question someone asked and she pretty much frowns AND tilts her head. It's so unnatural. We need to place them in the scene, make them do something with their bodies, instead of just facial expressions. Not to mention lots of typos (Marquess and Marchioness of Millen seem not to have a consistent title, because it changes from Millen to Millon to Milton throughout).
I can go on as well about how the characters are not that special, some side characters never get mentioned again once the romance starts, Eleanor harps on about how she understands poverty and is friends with the maids, but then they're only there to help her get gossip, and how grief was mentioned in the beginning but also never explored again, etc. All of this just means the author needs to work a lot more on her writing style, plot, character building & motivations, and pacing. A good and original romance story is in there somewhere, it just needs a more experienced hand. And definitely a better editor if there was one. I'll still watch out for her future works, but this one was just meh for me.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 186 reviews