Being a fan of H.P. Lovecraft, I had of course read some of the Cthulhu Mythos books August Derleth had written compiled in such works as the Mask of Cthulhu and The Trail of Cthulhu. Derleth had his own intepretation of Lovecraft's myth cycles resulting in stories that far removed from Lovecraft's vision. This made me initially doubt how well he could write a pastiche of Sherlock Holmes.
I've read the classics of Doyle to other versions such as the Hyde/Dracula encounters written by Loren D Estleman, and probably the best take on the concept of Holmes vs. Jack the Ripper by Ellery Queen. How close, I wondered, would Derleth keep to Doyle's style?
Getting a copy of #4 The Casebook of Solar Pons, though skeptical at first, I was pleasantly surprised. Derleth got the mood and style right, and rather smartly kept away from the attempts other imitators of Doyle have tried and miserably failed at - detailing out the breakdown Holmes would use to identify the origins of his visitors/clients attire, education, background, etc.
The mysteries were well hidden, the interaction between Dr. Lyndon Parker and Solar Pons spot on, and the details to the London world they inhabit distinct and colorful.
I can honestly say Derleth found his stride with Solar, and I'm definitely curious to read more. But mystery upon mystery, this book held one of its own. The copy I have shows 11 stories/cases listed on the table of contents - but there were actually 12 included in the book! Missing in the table of contents was The Adventure of the Amateur Philologist, which was nestled between The Adventure of the Missing Huntsman and The Adventure of The Whispering Knights (one of my favorites in the book).
Publisher mistake...or something more? This might be a job for Solar Pons...