Ludlum meets Peretti: God is the chessmaster of history. (4 stars)
Book 1 of the “Martyr’s Song” series reminded me of John Grisham, book 2 of Francine Rivers, but book 3 reminded me of Robert Ludlum. With fast-paced action you’d expect from a Robert Ludlum thriller, it’s a suspenseful page-turner about a terrorist threat to America because of a nuclear bomb and about a CIA operative Casius who acts outside orders. The story begins with two lovers, Tanya Vandervan and Shannon Richterson on a plantation in Venezuela. They are separated and both of their parents killed when the plantation is brutally attacked by drug-runners wanting to claim the territory as their own. Believing each other to be dead, Tanya tries to overcome her past by becoming Sherry Blake, a medical student, whereas Shannon falls under the influence of the dark powers behind the witch-doctor Sula (p35ff) and becomes Casius, a hired assassin for the CIA. Eight years later, their paths cross again in Venezuela, this time with global history at stake due to the terrorist threat.
The theology underlies the plot to a lesser degree than the other two novels in the series. For the most part this is a typical Robert Ludlum style read, minus the moral garbage, but with a killer on the loose, taking down villains, and a count-down for a nuclear explosion. But the theology is there, because Dekker wants us to see God’s hand acting behind the events that ensue. Several times, Dekker portrays the unfolding events as moves in a chessmatch where God Himself is playing against the forces of evil. “God’s playing his pieces in this chess match ... They’ve been moving and countermoving for decades up there on this one.” (p51) The chess match imagery returns throughout the novel. “We know who the players are. They are God and they are the forces of darkness. The white side and the black side.” (p95) Ironically the terrorists call their plan “God’s Thunder”, but the significance of the book’s title is that Dekker wants us to realize that God is in control. Behind the decisions of mankind, God is pulling strings and whispering to hearts, which Dekker calls “the thunder of heaven. It’s up to us whether we will listen to that thunder, but make no mistake, he moves the match.” (p51)
Shannon has embraced the side of evil: “You’ve given yourself to Satan, Shannon.” (p225) “He was possessed.” (p294) He wants nothing else than to take revenge by killing Abdullah. “He had been tormented for years ... But his tormentor had been from hell, grinding him into the ground.” (p233) But his actions could place the future of the United States in jeopardy. Evil can only be stopped and Shannon changed by Tanya’s love for him. Here Dekker shows how all the events are worked together by God to thwart evil. Shannon asks: “You can’t expect me to believe you were drawn to the jungle to save mankind from some diabolical plot to detonate a nuclear weapon on US soil. You don’t find that just a bit fantastic?” (p192) It is fantastic, but Dekker wants us to realize that “nothing is without a purpose”, and that God is governing all things in “God’s chess match,” and this is why Shannon and Tanya have been brought together in love (p268-9). Tanya herself comes to realize her place in God’s plan: “I know some things now, Shannon. I know that I was made to love you.” (p281) Her love plays a small role in God’s large plan. “And if I hadn’t loved you, the bomb would have gone off. If my parents hadn’t come to the jungle, or if we hadn’t fallen in love, or if Abdullah had chosen a different location, the bomb would have gone off. It was all God’s leading, his turning evil to good.” (p289). It’s divine chess: “The Creator is the ultimate chess master, isn’t he? Why he allows evil to wreak havoc, we can hardly understand. But in the end, it always plays into his hands. As it did this time." (p294) Ultimately Dekker wants us to marvel at the chessmaster: “God is quite brilliant, don’t you think?” (p52)
To properly understand the role that love plays in this cosmic chess game, one needs to read Vol. 2 of the series, because it is in this book that Dekker more fully works out his understanding of true love as requiring a willingness to die to the self and one’s own desires (p269), in a Christlike sacrifice (p285). While the powers of evil desire to kill, the powers of love desire to die, a distinction Dekker makes clear when speaking about Christ’s death: “There were two sides to the crucifixion of Christ – a killing and a dying. Like in some grand chess match, there are the black players who are the killers, and there are the white, who are the die-ers. One kills for hate, while others die for love.” (p156) Shannon is currently a killer: “He’d come to the jungle to kill ... She, on the other hand, had come to die…” (p199). But he must make a choice: “Are you ready to die, Shannon? Are you ready to kill, Shannon?” (p234) “No, you can’t change what I am, Tanya. And I am a killer. It’s what I do. I kill. I do not die.” (p227) Can Tanya’s loving change who Shannon is? “She’s loving and she’s dying and she’s changing the world.” (p208)
In the end, the theological underpinning isn’t entirely successful:
1. Dekker emphasizes again and again that Tanya was made to love Shannon, and that this would make all the difference, but only until the final climax does it become somewhat clear how her final act of loving really does make a difference. This is the hinge on which the whole chess match depends, yet there was still some cloud over *why* and *how* Tanya’s love for Shannon changed the outcome. I found the main premise a little too hard to swallow, that she must love him even though she (and we!) doesn’t know why, simply because God tells her to. It’s true that God uses our moves and decisions as part of his chess match, but usually these are ordinary thought-out decisions of daily life, not irrational and unexplained passions resulting from visions. It could be argued that the *why* of Tanya’s love for Shannon becomes evident in the finale, but perhaps it would be even clearer if Dekker had explained what Shannon would have done if Tanya was not present in the final scene. The chain of reasoning also is weak, because while he states that “our parents – they died for this day” (p282), the reality is that if the parents hadn’t died, the terrorists wouldn’t have established the foothold they needed in the plantation, Shannon would not have been filled with revenge, so the bomb scenario would not have arisen in the first place.
2. Dekker suggests that God speaks directly to people today in visions like the one Tanya sees (p106,191), although it could be conceded that this is a literary device that serves the plot, and that he is not seriously advocating ongoing revelation.
3. There are a few aspects of the plot that are somewhat too implausible, such as Tanya’s return to Venezuela at the insistence of her adoptive grandma (Helen Jovic, known to readers from the other books in the series) in response to a vision, and the failure of the two main characters to recognize one another. The identification of Shannon with Casius is easy to figure out, but somehow I think Dekker isn’t trying to hide this from us, because he has a much greater surprise and twist regarding character identity in store for us at the end.
But these weaknesses aside, on the whole this is a well-written and thought-provoking novel. Overall this novel has less theological weaknesses than the first two, but then again, the theology is more in the background here with the plot taking center stage. Fans of Robert Ludlum style suspense thrillers will love the fast-paced story-line which never lets up. And although it’s not quite as deep as his other novels, and the story-line could have been tightened somewhat, the theology is in itself sound. Dekker’s main point is bang on: “Remember, always look past your own eyes.” (p32) For a fast paced read with the thrills of Ludlum and the theological depth of Peretti, read of “The Thunder of Heaven” and be reminded that God is the chessmaster behind history, working all things for good.