while this book was a compilation of two, I read it as one and will review it that way. One thing that can be said in it's favour is that there was blessedly little recapitulating things we already knew in the second half.
The concept was one I really liked, Lackey has successfully used the theme of music as vessel for magic in other bardic stories but this was the first modern day setting I had picked up. Elves, music/magic dastardly plots.... It sounded full of potential and was written in the 90's so in a pretty good part of Lackey's writing career. The last few Lackey books I had read had been increasingly disappointing but I was hopeful.
Sadly the best to be said for it was that it wasn't too bad and now I am going to slam it, because an author with Lackey's experience, high profile, massive following and artistic freedom should damn well do better! I have seen a lost of "Misty fans" blaming the co-author but I doubt it, I have never read any of Ellen Guon's independent work so I can't compare, but the flaws inherent in this book are all repeated themes in Lackey's work.
1) The wimpy lead male. Eric is a musician who has chosen to be a rolling stone and he whines his self pitying way through the first part of the story because his girlfriend dumped him. He then discovers he is a powerful natural bard, about which he frequently whinges. He self flagellates over things that are not his fault but then does batshite crazy things like going to visit the evil sorceress or walking alone into high security facilities. Also, as an early coup de grace for his character, he spends pages 30-200 doing the 'I don't believe in elves, this cant be happening' routine which is even more annoying than his whinging.
Eris is not convincing as a male character in the same way a lot of the Lackey stable of characters are not convincing. Sure, we all loved Vanyal, but the continuing stories of Lavan, Skiff, Alberich or here, Kory? Lets face it, they may start out are good, believable characters but by the end they are are NOT well written males at all. It is not that they are effeminate, it is not that they think and behave like a girlie idea of how boys think because, with good writing skills those things can work. Here it is quite simply poor, lazy, writing and it infected every element of the male characters in this book in the same way that it affects almost all of Lackey's later Valdemar writing.
2) Fight scenes. It takes more than calling everyone in sight a 'warrior' or 'elven warrior' to make fight scenes convincing. Lackey has written some good fight scenes, especially early in her career, but again, the longer she writes the lazier they get. In this story they are particularly poorly written to the point that during both big confrontations I kept losing interest in the story instead of being riveted, as you should be in a final fight scene.
3) Poor continuing character development. And not only the males. The initial characters are well set up, even whining Eric, but as the story progresses it is as if, once established, they are just dropped with no further character progression until by the end of the story they have become cardboard cutouts. This also is pure Lackey; she has a formidable talent for sketching characters quickly creating real people one is involved in. But she has less ability for maintaining them and this is a continuous problem even with her best Valdemar series. Talia for example is a fine character for the Arrows trilogy, but once married off to Dirk, then fades to become practically one dimensional whenever she makes a rare appearance in later books and she is hardly the only one. In this book Beth may be the biggest casualty (she is more real as a person on page 30 in the first book than on page 400 in the second) but it applies equally to them all.
4) And the last point I will bother with though there are others I could mention; the peculiar sex ethics that made "If I pay thee not in gold" ...quirky.... are in full force here but in a different way; instead of sex changing, bed hopping and actual sex, the three main characters get together at the end of the first part. Then they are portrayed as being in a polygamous relationship in the second part of the story with no explanation or expansion, it is almost as though the idea of writing an unusual relationship was titillating the the author/s but in actuality she/they were to embarrassed to actually do so. Consequently, it is one the least convincing relationships I have ever read. The three share a bed and that is all we hear, no attempt to make this real with behaviour, affection, sex or shared experiences. both the males kiss Beth once or twice but other than that this, the relationship we are told is the mainstay of the three's very existence is as cold as last weeks porridge. Slightly moldy to boot.
So another disappointing one, at least I only paid $2 AU for it on a sale table.