I found one valuable piece of information, which I'll paraphrase here: by keeping ourselves at the periphery of what we want, we satisfy this want, unfulfillingly, but just enough to prevent us from actually taking the risks required to actually get what we want.
That was eye-opening and helpful. The other 99% of this book: not so much. I guess I should have expected a book with this title to have a bunch of outdated ideas about gender (the ideas about what men "naturally" do, what women "naturally" need are so absurd and no scientific data, of course, was provided to back up these gender binary-enforcing claims ... I mean, the science does not exist, so there's that). It also talked about "left brain-right brain" stuff, super randomly, which I'm pretty sure has also been thoroughly debunked. And it spoke about "The Secret" positively– major red flag. "Manifestation" as a self-help method woefully misunderstands the realities of folks who are not white and middle to upper class, not to mention how incredibly victim blaming it is as a philosophy.
There were some valuable insights which I recognized from scientifically backed forms of therapy such as DBT and CBT. And I appreciated the author's encouragement of the reader to seek therapy and the emphasis on not dwelling in shame. But these are all things I can get from books without all the above flaws.
I often feel like everyone else has received a rulebook on how to exist within dating and relationships and I, I don't know, I missed school that week or something. 😂 So I have tried to hack it by occasionally reading books like this and I am always disappointed by the outdated (and harmful) gender norms, the watered down concepts better obtained in therapy or by books focused on trauma, and the wishy washy "positive vibes" advice (whose underside really is shame). This was no exception.