So, in all fairness: this book gave me exactly what it promised, which was a genderbent retelling of Sleeping Beauty featuring a proud-and-intelligent prince, a prophecied princess, and a powerful theme of sacrifice and trust. And the story itself? Excellent. However, certain aspects of the book just didn't do it for me.
We'll start with what I liked. The characters were interesting and developed well. Rosanna was, pleasantly, a heroine who could be strong and yet uncertain, outdoorsy and yet still feminine, a princess but humble and ready to serve. Daemyn Rand was fascinating, arguably the best part of the book. He's quiet, mysterious, loyal, and a skilled warrior, but manages to avoid all the cliches that can come with those traits. I enjoyed most of Daemyn's family — a lot of colorful characters there! — and Rosanna's friend, Isi, and her brother, Bertrand. (Friendships and family relationships are the best, y'all. I almost wish we could've had a few more scenes with Rosanna and Isi and Rosanna and Bertrand.) The plot itself is also good — or, rather, the plots, since there are two running the whole time: Alexander's efforts to remove his curse (intriguing, even though we know he'll fail) and Rosanna's quest to wake him (also intriguing and full of danger and adventure). And Tricia also handled the allegorical and spiritual elements incredibly well; they're powerful and memorable rather than cheesy.
What didn't I like, then? Part of the problem is Alexander, who annoys me immensely for most of the book. Don't get me wrong; he's a well-drawn character with excellent development. But, for much of the book, he's also a proud, self-congratulating, stuck-up jerk who thinks that he can solve every problem in life just because he's smart. And, I mean, he's realistic; pride does cause about 75% of the problems in any world, one way or another. He's just also annoying, and Jadon was the only reason I could deal with some of Alexander's chapters as well as I did.
By far my biggest problem with this book, though, is the worldbuilding. That is, it doesn't make sense. It feels like the author smooshed the American wilderness with a standard European fantasy world, and while that sounds great in theory, it didn't quite work in practice, and I really wish that the author had picked one (preferably American wilderness) and stuck to it. Or, if she wants to keep the combined element, make more sense of how they're combined! In particular, please explain why the pumpernickel all the place names sound Native American when most of the characters (except for a few minor and villainous characters) have white-person names. That is not how language storming works. And, as I predicted in my status update, it did bother me through the entire book. The worst of it is, the author could've fixed the problem pretty easily by mixing more native-sounding people names in with the white-sounding ones, because then I could rationalize it as "Oh, ok, we've got native-analogous and settler-analogous people here, and they've mixed and intermarried and that's why we've got this strange mix of cultures." But she didn't, so I can't, and arrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhh.
(This would probably bother me less if the first scene hadn't gotten me so hopeful that this was a world primarily based on pre-settlers America, with the culture being primarily native-analogous. That would've been so much fun. But nope. It didn't happen.)
So, for the TL;DR: I wanted to love it, but I didn't. Nonetheless, it's an excellent story with mostly enjoyable characters (and one annoying one) and an excellent theme, but if you're a worldbuilding person, that element might just drive you crazy.