In The Mercury 13, Ackmann took what would have otherwise been an inspiring book about thirteen women's struggle to gain entry into the new United State's space program and managed to turn it into a platform to push feminist dogma. I almost put the book down during the first few chapters after repeated jabs at the NASA leadership for daring to put winning a war with Russia above women's equality. That is really the crux of this book; Ackmann believes it should have been more important to ensure women's equality in the space program than to win the space race.
In typical feminist fashion, Ackmann is adamant that a woman is equal to a man in all things - then considers it a high achievement when Cobb or one of the other Mercury 13 women completes a test that was designed for men. Excuse me, but if a woman is the equal of a man than the standard should be identical and the resulting scores comparable with no cause for rejoicing when a woman scores the same as a man. Conveniently, in spite of Ackmann's repeated claims that the "Mercury 13" passed all the tests the Project Mercury astronauts had passed with "flying colors," there is almost no objective data to show how they actually stacked up to the males who were selected. It is easier to vilify the government's choices to use (male) military test pilots as their first pool for astronaut selection as discriminatory when the cold, hard data is conveniently not presented.
I present two examples of this lack of data. First, was the discussion of Funk's claim that she beat Glenn's score on the stationary bike. There was a link to additional data in the endnotes and I thought I was going to get to read actual test results. Instead, there was only limited data - in all fairness proving that Funk came nowhere close to Glenn's results - and between the endnotes and the data in chapter six all we are given is a listing of the order of the top three women with no data to tell us how they compared to the men. In chapter eight, while explaining Cobb's completion of the physical fitness tests at Pensacola much is made of her being required to scale a six foot, six inch wall even thought she was shorter than the average man. So what? Pushing this as some sort of achievement both ignores the fact that over 20% of men are Cobb's height or shorter and demonstrates once again that Ackmann is simply pushing her feminist agenda that a woman is the equal to a man; until it is clear that there are obvious differences between women and men and then there must be a separate, lower, standard for women.
There is much made in the book of the difficulties the women encountered in receiving time off work, finding caretakers for their children while they were gone, and affording to attend the testing. Ironically, Ackmann has nothing good to say about Eisenhower's decision to use military test pilots as the pool to select the Project Mercury astronauts, even though it is obvious that the choice to limit prospective candidates to male military pilots eliminated all of the conflicts these women experienced. She even goes so far as to accuse Eisenhower of potentially compromising the "fundamental principles of democracy!" Again, Ackmann would rather have seen NASA delayed in their selection of astronauts with the potential that Russia win the space race and the Cold War, so long as the selection process met her standard of equality and fairness.
Another topic brought up ad nauseam was women's lighter weight which would require less fuel, less food, and less oxygen for accomplishment of a space mission. While all of that is true it is a pointless argument. It is obvious that NASA did not make weight a primary requirement for inclusion in the space program. If they wanted light astronauts they would have set a very low weight threshold. Instead, their primary criteria were for health, intelligence, and fitness. We are made well aware throughout the book that the Mercury 13 were smaller than their male counterparts but, as mentioned above, there is no data given other than subjective and unsubstantiated claims that the women "aced" the tests or passed with "flying colors" to tell us how they performed on the tests that NASA actually considered consequential.
Something completely ignored by Ackmann was the critical psycho-social element in selection of astronauts. NASA selected the seven members of Project Mercury from a pool of eighteen highly qualified finalists based on their personality traits and how they would interact with their fellow astronauts, not solely their physical achievements or psychological exam results. Ironically, Ackmann's poster child for the Mercury 13, Cobb, was commented on throughout the book as being a loner, anti-social, and socially awkward. Cobb was not an academic and "took to skipping school for weeks at a time." The Mercury Project astronauts were completely immersed in studying for months at a time in preparation for the first space missions. Ackmann remarks on the end of Cobb's relationship with Ford, "Cobb loved flight and solitude more." When discussing Ford's death in a plane crash Ackmann states, "Flight magazine later wrote, that he became 'out of place and impractical anywhere but in the air.' The passage could have been describing Cobb." Where in that isolationism are we expected to believe Cobb would have been a great teammate during a lengthy space mission in a very confined environment with her fellow astronauts?
Sadly, Ackmann's feminism overshadows what is otherwise a fantastic book. Her push to show discrimination by Eisenhower and NASA for choosing test pilots as their selection pool when the Mercury Program was first begun overshadows the demonstrable discrimination in NASA and the government's lack of cooperation to continue testing of women for potential inclusion in the space program. Her focus on how the women of the Mercury 13 were discriminated against ensures the women are turned into flat characters with every part of their lives being related to how they were discriminate against in aviation because of their gender. Women today are finally breaking through the gender barriers that have held them back and it is high time they be recognized for their struggle, however, using their story to push a feminist agenda and make poorly argued points about gender discrimination is not the way to honor them or their legacy. This book could have been written so differently and could have communicated the same story, even the same message of discrimination, without subjugating the story of the Mercury 13 to the author's agenda.