Please do note that my annoyed one star rating is NOT in any way meant to be a comment on L.M. Montgomery's wonderful short stories (as for the most part, they deserve a three to five star rating), but on the supremely user-unfriendly way in which Dodo Press has presented and published them. And yes, when I first became aware of the Dodo Press collection of Montgomery short fiction, I was certainly much excited because from the title, from Lucy Maud Montgomery Short Stories: 1896-1901, it appeared as though the stories would be arranged chronologically. However, while the tales contained in the collection are indeed those written, those penned by L. M. Montgomery from 1896-1901, the stories themselves have been arranged in random (and thus not in chronological) order. So if you were/are looking forward to finally being able to read L.M. Montgomery's short stories in actual order of their chronological appearance, this fact will ot course make your desire, your project, considerably more difficult.
However, what I find even more problematic with Lucy Maud Montgomery Short Stories: 1896-1901 is the lack of a usable and acceptable table of contents. For while both the stories and their date, their year of appearance are listed at the beginning of the book, Dodo Press has somehow not deemed it necessary to also supply the starting pages for the stories. Thus, if you desire to read a particular story, or if you are actually trying to read the stories chronologically, you will need to guess on which page said story actually and in fact commences. And no, I really and truly do not understand why Dodo Press could not have arranged the stories by year of appearance, and it is simply unacceptable that the table of contents is so user-unfriendly.
And yes, this here collection of L. M. Montgomery short stories is also not going to be of much use for anyone wishing to use it for academic purposes, as there is neither an introduction nor is any of the source material listed. Now an introduction would certainly have been beneficial, but of course also not absolutely necessary, but Dodo Press should really have at the very least listed the diverse magazines, journals etc. in which these stories originally appeared. And while I still mildly enjoyed my reading time, the set-up for and of >u>Lucy Maud Montgomery Short Stories: 1896-1901 is certainly a major and huge personal disappointment, and I feel that I therefore should warn fans of L.M. Montgomery about the shortcomings of this particular book, of Dodo Press’s Lucy Maud Montgomery Short Stories: 1896-1901 (and yes, of the sequels as well, as the other books in the Dodo Press collection of L.M. Montgomery short stories ALL have exactly the same issues).
And if indeed, while I also now do realise that Dodo Press has probably just taken these L. M. Montgomery short stories from free online sites such As Project Gutenberg, that still does NOT excuse the user unfriendly format I encountered. Yes, I could likely just as easily (and indeed much more cheaply) have downloaded the short stories and then formatted them myself. However, since I obtained this series (this collection) as printed books (and that they were also much a much appreciated and cherished gift), I can and do expect a reader-friendly format, and this simply does not ever materialise.