Maybe I am being just a trifle, just a bit too literal this morning, but with Peter Brown's Mr. Tiger Goes Wild, I do indeed tend to have a few rather annoying thematic and textual issues with especially the last part of the story (namely that if Mr. Tiger really and truly does in fact go wild so to speak, if he for certain has reverted back to being how tigers actually exist and act in nature, he would of course and naturally not be friends and companions with the other animals depicted and presented in Mr. Tiger Goes Wild, but would bien sûr be a predator stalking, killing and yes also consuming, eating them).
And while I have definitely found the accompanying illustrations colourful, fun and engaging and can even very much appreciate the featured included messages and lessons regarding being free to be oneself, being willing to embrace change (and in fact to also be willing and able to lead the way towards the latter, as it is Mr. Tiger who first and bravely decides to embrace his nature, to go wild, even though he later also does realise that he is not an island and still requires and needs his friends and companions), I am personally and logistically just not all that happy and comfortable with author/illustrator Peter Brown having chosen a tiger as the main protagonist of Mr. Tiger Goes Wild (as I am sorry to say, literal-minded I indeed just finds it more than a bit strange and biologically problematic to see and read about Peter Brown's tiger romping and cavorting, being best friends with animals that would in nature usually be considered tiger prey).