I was drawn to this book mainly because I thought it an interesting concept to have this mythical well-known story told from Lancelot's point of view. I have always personally found Lancelot one of the more intriguing characters from Arthurian legend just for the conflicting symbolism of his character. On the one hand he is the greatest and noblest of knights, and yet he is also a traitor. Giles Kristian takes that premise and plays with it, to make Lancelot completely his own character, and give us an intimate insight into the man behind the legend. The result is breath-taking.
My first book from Giles, I suppose it would be classed as historical fantasy, though the magical elements to it are limited and it takes more of a realistic and gritty approach, which I was surprised to say that I actually enjoyed, as generally I tend to be a fan of the magic in Arthurian lore. The book is set in 5th century Britain, with the Romans having left and the constant threat of Saxon invasions, not to mention the bickering Kings and warlords of Britain itself. Giles really succeeds in bringing this harsh landscape to life, creating a very vivid re-imagining of Britain at the time which really drew me into the story. Whilst magic plays a limited role in the book, Giles does capture a sense of mysticism that I enjoyed. There are references to the old Gods and to superstitions, even as Christianity is taking more of a hold. I enjoyed Merlin's character as a druid, and found certain aspects of the story cleverly handled such as how Arthur obtains Excalibur.
I was surprised to find how much of the book is spent on Lancelot's childhood and adolescent years, and much of the book feels like a coming of age story. Some readers might find the pacing of the book too slow in this regards, as we don't really get to much of the 'proper action' till much later; and certainly we spend less time with the Lancelot of legend than we do with the warrior in the making. I did find aspects of the pacing a little odd myself, as the latter parts do seem rather rushed in comparison to the earlier parts of the story. The last few chapters seem to cover a lot of ground and span over Lancelot's later years much more quickly.
That being said, I do understand Giles' approach. This book really is a character study of Lancelot, where Giles is already expecting the reader to know the Lancelot of legend, with this book more about exploring his earlier years and what shaped him to become the man that he did. I suppose the only reason why I wanted more is because I loved Lancelot so much as a character by this point, as well as the general way in which Giles was telling the story, and thought it a pity we seemed to skim over periods of his life that I actually would have been interested in seeing play out in more detail, for instance his relationship with Helaine, and certainly I wanted more of his relationship with Galahad at the end, as the glimpses we got of their father-son relationship were so touching.
I would say that because the first half of the book is much more fleshed out than the second half, I probably ended up enjoying this section more. That is not to say that I didn't enjoy the later parts, just that perhaps it didn't feel quite as rich or satisfying, though the later parts certainly did pack an emotional punch, with all the prior character building really paying off.
Lancelot himself I fell in love with in the first few chapters of the novel, and from there on, no matter what happened, I was firmly on his side. Giles presents us with this endearing young boy, who has a love for animals, and who is desperate to impress his father, and who burns in his intensity and determination. We witness him early on in the novel lose his family and as such one almost can't help but feel protective of him. On the Island of Karrek Loos yn Koos, where he is taken in by Lady Nimueh, he is at first an outsider, shunned by the other boys and has only his sparhawk for company. Yet we see how he endears himself to the formidable warrior Pelleas, (whose friendship with Lancelot I really enjoyed and made for a touching arc in the book), and we admire him for his determination, such as when he wins the race against the older boys, or later when he won't give up looking for Benesek's sword. Then of course he rescues Guinevere, and suddenly he is no longer alone but has found his soul-mate. Furthermore, the qualities that Giles presents in Lancelot as a young boy, stay with him throughout the book, and more than anything as a reader we feel everything he feels, and can understand the weight of his every decision.
Of course the two relationships that are integral to Lancelot's overall story, are those with Guinevere and Arthur, and I liked how both were handled in the book. As already mentioned, Lancelot and Guinevere meet here as children, which is a deviation from Arthurian lore, however, Giles is quite clear that this is his take on the Arthurian stories and not necessarily a faithful re-telling, and I certainly had no issue with this. I thought that having Lancelot and Guinevere meet long before either meet Arthur made sense in this story, which paints their relationship in a much more tragic way, rather than the classic betrayal of legend, and really helps build a meaningful connection between them. They are both outsiders on the island, drawn to each other, and the bond formed between them in those early years never fades. Lancelot's love for Guinevere reads as very 'pure', even though it later becomes a matter of great personal torment for him.
That brings us to the friendship between Lancelot and Arthur. Arthur, though he does not feature till around the half way mark, makes a very strong impression when he does enter the story. Giles paints him as a very charismatic figure and leader of men, who is probably ten years or so older than Lancelot. As such it is easy to see why Lancelot, only eighteen or so at the time, is so in awe of Arthur and so eager to pledge his allegiance to him. A strong bond is established between the two very quickly, from Arthur's point of view I suppose spurred by Lancelot's bravery and loyalty to him and the potential he sees in this young warrior. Within a few chapters, Giles is able to convincingly portray a genuine brotherhood between the two, which then sets things up for Guinevere to be re-introduced as Arthur's wife, and as a reader it was so easy to feel Lancelot's anguish as his heart is essentially torn in two.
This builds to the inevitable conclusion of the story, which I was almost in dread of at this stage because I was so attached to the principal characters, especially Lancelot, and didn't want everything to come crashing down or to be disappointed by Lancelot's actions. The betrayal does happen, however, not in the way I had expected it to, and I personally liked the way Giles handled this and thought it the right take for this particular re-telling of the story. At the same time I fully appreciate that some might see it as a 'cop out', and that it possibly takes away from some of the complexities of the traditional story, as rather than being a conscious betrayal, it is an unconscious one. However, I thought it made everything just all the more tragic, and fitted the depictions of the characters set out in this story, whilst still allowing the story to play out in a manner similar to the way it usually would.
Whilst it did mean that Lancelot and Guinevere, certainly to my eyes, were absolved of the usual treachery they are associated with, I think overall the handling of this love-triangle still highlighted flaws in all three characters. From Lancelot and Guinevere's part for instance, perhaps if they had been honest with Arthur from the start about their past relationship, he might have been more trusting of them. Arthur, as it is, once he discovers their history on the Island, has seeds of doubt sown in his mind that does in particular impact his relationship with Lancelot. I did personally think this was more due to his own insecurity and jealousy than anything else, and certainly his later actions towards Guinevere were for me rather unforgivable, no matter the hurt he felt.
This book does features a host of other well known Arthurian characters, and amongst those deserving a mention are Merlin, Gwain, Bors, Pelleas, Nimueh, Melwas and Mordred (whose arc whilst succinctly told, is well-told I thought).
There is so much more I could say about the book, however, I'm aware this is already a long review. In short, I absolutely loved this bold and powerful re-telling of the Arthurian myth, which Giles succeeds in completely making his own. Whilst it wasn't necessarily what I had been expecting, and whilst I can also objectively say does have it's flaws, it still ended up being a five star read for me, just because of the emotions it evoked. The ending was heart-breaking, and whilst a part of me wished that Lancelot hadn't joined the battle, and hated that he left Galahad on that hillside, it also felt like absolutely the right ending for the character, fighting by Arthur's side.
It is a story filled with loss and love, of friendship and honour, an intimate character driven story, though it does have some glorious battle scenes within it as well. I should also say that Giles' prose was beautiful, and that this book was, for me at least, one to really savour. Certainly it is a story that will stay with me for a long while, and which has me eager to pick up the sequel, which focuses on Galahad.