for the most part, the turbulent term of tyke tiler is a typical school story. the protagonist, tyke, gets up to various escapades with their best friend danny, including stealing money from teachers, rescuing an escaped pet mouse and setting up a bunker in a disused paper mill.
the plot is very straightforward. there are pets and chaotic families, a myriad of teachers, class clowns and ruthless bullies. the reader follows tyke through the last term at primary school, which adds a nice coming-of-age element to the story.
tyke's issue (and perhaps their downfall) is their inability to stay out of trouble. in one last act of defiance, they climb onto the roof to ring the school bell, which has lay dormant since 1945. when their most-hated teacher catches them in the act, she screams at 'theodora tiler' to come down, revealing to the reader that the assumed male protagonist is, [SPOILER] infact, a girl. shock horror.
being called by their birth name evokes a 'black rage' in the child, causing them to fall off the roof and sustain various injuries. although it isn't 'revealed' until the end of the text, the ambiguity of the protagonist's identity is hinted at several times throughout, and each time tyke expresses similar feelings of anger and annoyance. the first-person narration used by kemp ensures that tyke has control of the narrative (at least until the last chapter).
this book is very of its time (it was written in the 1970s). there are jokes at the beginning of each chapter which wouldn't really make sense to a modern audience. furthermore, although this was probably considered progressive when published, the big 'reveal' falls flat by today's standards.
firstly, the fact that tyke's gender is part of the 'plot twist' of the novel suggests that the reader is meant to be shocked by this, because the protagonist has engaged in typically 'masculine' activities throughout. the shock factor of this reveal relies on the assumption that the reader will have engaged with outdated stereotypes about masculinity/femininity when reading.
after the 'reveal,' i was hoping there would be a conversation where tyke explained why they didn't like their birth name, but that didn't happen. (nevertheless, i wasn't too surprised given how long ago it was published).
the last chapter was also uncomfortable to read as a 21st-century reader. unlike the rest of the book, it is written from the perspective of tyke's teacher, mr merchant. it was quite disappointing to not hear tyke's side of the story after the accident. furthermore, whilst mr merchant has always used tyke's preferred name to their face, he uses she/her pronouns when talking about tyke in the last chapter. somehow, this felt wrong, as it starkly juxtaposes how tyke views themself and how they are viewed by others.
although we never get to hear from tyke about how they prefer to identify, the disgust they feel towards their birth name is made explicitly clear. this allows the reader to empathise with tyke's discomfort when it is used towards them in moments of anger.
i think if this book was written nowadays, the ending would be very different & the conversation about how tyke prefers to identify would probably take place.
i think this book can be read in two different ways: it is either an accurate depiction of the experience of a gender-non-conforming young person in the 1970s, OR it is a feminist text which encourages the reader to assume that tyke is male based on their behaviour, and then pokes fun at them when they come to that conclusion, since doing so relies on outdated stereotypes.
this book also features a disabled character in the form of tyke's best friend, danny. whilst this depiction lacks nuance, it is refreshing to see it in a book written almost fifty years ago.
this is an entertaining and easily readable middle-grade book, which becomes more interesting the more you think about it. i am so curious as to how children responded to it in the 1970s, and how they would respond to it today!