Bitter Truths Wrapped in Sweet Candy Coatings
It seems to me that in his novels Brook Clarke has shown himself to be a master of inventive word play, comic absurdity, and irony - all tucked into the vaguely disorienting structure that is familiar to us as a hallmark of the postmodern novel. Clarke can be clever, tender, profound, and wildly funny.
In these short stories, though, there seems to be a more powerful undercurrent of something else - bitterness, or possibly anger. Whether we are addressing failed marriages, failed wars, failed jobs, failed lovers, failed children, failed adults, or failed lives in general, there is a darkness, and no particular signs or promises of redemption. Sure, there is still the comic absurdity. And there is the masterful and disorienting juxtaposition of the ordinary, the extraordinary, the magical, and the bizarre. Sometimes there is just structural playfulness or literary joking. But, still with all of that, the predominant tone is in the minor chord.
The narrators of these pieces, (most are told in the first person singular, or the more unnerving plural), are contemptible in a delusional, clueless, sadsack sort of way. Cheating husbands, mean children, casual racists, inattentive lovers, distant parents - they're all here and they seem to want forgiveness, or validation, and yet realize they deserve none. They all spew a carefully and precisely calibrated mix of truth and falsehood, with instances of great insight punctuated by profound self-delusion. It's a little unnerving that they can also be very funny, but of course that's one of Clarke's signature strengths.
And so, with all that said, I enjoyed almost every piece here. Clarke challenges you with difficult characters, implausible plots, antic developments, and hopeless choices, but he does it with such style and wit that you keep diving back in. I've found that with his novels, and it's now confirmed here with this little candy dish of sweet-and-sour treats. A nice find.
(Please note that I received a free advance ecopy of this book without a review requirement, or any influence regarding review content should I choose to post a review. Apart from that I have no connection at all to either the author or the publisher of this book.)