Columbus’ stock has been losing value, in terms of his historical reputation, for some time now. The Genoese navigator in whose honor Columbus Day was established in 1934 is now widely seen, among many communities within the United States of America and around the world, as a perpetrator of genocide against Indigenous Americans. This change in perceptions has led to the removal or destruction of Columbus monuments in Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Chicago, and other U.S. cities. And the aspects of Christopher Columbus’ life and legacy that have brought him into such disrepute are on full display in William Least Heat-Moon’s 2002 book Columbus in the Americas.
Least Heat-Moon is best-known for travel books such as Blue Highways (1982). In that book, he wrote of journeying across the United States by staying away from the interstates and other major highways, and instead traveling on the relatively obscure local roads that are drawn in blue on the U.S. highway maps printed by many map companies. But as his cultural heritage includes Osage ancestry, it makes sense that he would be interested in the impact of Christopher Columbus’ four trans-Atlantic voyages upon the Indigenous peoples of the Americas.
And Least Heat-Moon pulls no punches when evaluating what Columbus did to the original inhabitants of the American continent. On Columbus’ first voyage, for instance, he wrote a notorious letter to Spain’s King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, the monarchs who in 1492 financed Columbus’ improbable idea of finding a westward maritime route to China and “the Indies.” Reminding the monarchs of their infamous Alhambra Decree – in which Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered the expulsion of Spain’s entire Jewish population – Columbus told the monarchs how ready the Taino people seemed to be for conversion to Christianity, right down to a willingness to make the Sign of the Cross. Columbus, in his letter, assures Ferdinand and Isabella that with enough priests sent to the Americas, it would be easy “to convert [the Taino] as you have destroyed those…who would not seek to confess the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”. Least Heat-Moon’s assessment:
These words, to all but those possessed of fervid messianism, must make the blood run cold of anyone who values cultural diversity and respects the rights of indigenous societies to retain their unique ways. Although Columbus continually failed to comprehend it, Taino life was rich with spiritual beliefs that had maintained them for centuries, beliefs that did not urge them to force heir convictions upon others or kill in the name of a deity. Their willingness to imitate uncomprehendingly the sign of the cross was not, as Columbus believed, a desire for conversion but more probably an amusement and a wish to please… (p. 54).
Least Heat-Moon proceeds with a grim cataloguing of Columbus’ crimes. He presided over mass killings of whole nations of Indigenous Americans who resisted Spanish rule. Thousands of other Indigenous people were consigned to slavery – in spite of Columbus’ earlier assurances to the Spanish monarchs that he would enslave only those “Indians” who refused to accept Christianity. While he was about it – knowing, no doubt, the kinds of conquerors he would need to have along in order to reduce the continent under Spanish hegemony – Columbus also made a practice of giving Indigenous women to leading Spaniards as sexual slaves. Looking at one particular episode of Columbus’ brutality toward Indigenous people on what is now the island of St. Croix, during Columbus’ second voyage to the Americans in November of 1493, Least Heat-Moon writes that
People who believe that Divine Hands of Justice mete out rewards and punishments for human actions need look no further than that November day in 1493 on the Island of the Holy Cross for reasons why the fortunes of Columbus almost immediately began to turn….Columbus, never adept in accepting his own role in his ultimate fate, apparently saw himself blameless in such actions despite his practice of handing over to his men Indian women. (p. 106)
Columbus may have been a bold navigator – though he underestimated the size of the Earth, and his sailors would have died of hunger or thirst long before reaching China if they hadn’t happened upon the American continent. But he was a terribly incompetent administrator – to the extent that, not too long after being named “Admiral of the Ocean Sea” by a grateful Ferdinand and Isabella, he was shipped home to Spain in disgrace, and in irons. Of that shameful end to Columbus’ third voyage, Least Heat-Moon states grimly, if accurately, that “so the Admiral, in bondage, made his sixth crossing of his Ocean Sea, this time in the manner of the hundreds of Indian captives he’d sent over it” (p. 151).
Wanting to be fair to the magnitude of Columbus’ impact upon history, Least Heat-Moon closes this concise, 180-page study by writing that Columbus “accomplished what no one before him had: He found a route to open permanently the West to the East….In doing so, he left a name more recognized – if not always honored – than almost any other in history”. Against that, one must set Columbus’ “establishing practices and reinforcing attitudes that would lead to the extermination of cultures and peoples, perhaps as many as forty million.” On that basis, Least Heat-Moon concludes that “There is no reason, earth, to weep for Christopher Columbus” (p. 180).
Fans of Christopher Columbus – however many or few of them there still may be – probably would not enjoy Columbus in the Americas. Other readers, by contrast, should find it an interesting and informative historical study.