What do you think?
Rate this book
The Spy Who Changed the World: Klaus Fuchs, Physicist and Soviet Double Agent
The world first heard of Klaus Fuchs, the head of theoretical physics at the British Research Establishment at Harwell in February 1950 when he appeared at the Old Bailey, accused of passing secrets to the Soviet Union. For over sixty years disinformation and lies surrounded the story of Klaus Fuchs as the Governments of Britain, the United States and Russia all tried to cover up the truth about his treachery.
Piecing together the story from archives in Britain, the United States, Russia and Germany, The Spy Who Changed the World unravels the truth about Fuchs and reveals for the first time his long career of espionage. It proves that he played a pivotal role in Britain's bomb programme in the race to keep up with the United States in the atomic age, and that he revealed vital secrets about the atom bomb, as well as the immensely destructive hydrogen bomb to the Soviet Government.
It is a dramatic tale of clandestine meetings, deadly secrets, family entanglements and illicit love affairs, all set against the tumultuous years from the rise of Hitler to the start of the Cold War.
Piecing together the story from archives in Britain, the United States, Russia and Germany, The Spy Who Changed the World unravels the truth about Fuchs and reveals for the first time his long career of espionage. It proves that he played a pivotal role in Britain's bomb programme in the race to keep up with the United States in the atomic age, and that he revealed vital secrets about the atom bomb, as well as the immensely destructive hydrogen bomb to the Soviet Government.
It is a dramatic tale of clandestine meetings, deadly secrets, family entanglements and illicit love affairs, all set against the tumultuous years from the rise of Hitler to the start of the Cold War.
272 pages, Hardcover
First published June 1, 2014
49 people are currently reading
315 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 31 reviews
Read
May 2, 2024i finally finished it 🤪 it feels wrong to give a rating to the story of a person’s actual life when said person isn’t alive to write that story for themselves, so i won’t rate it. but it was good!!!
Read
February 22, 2019The story of Klaus Fuchs the brilliant mathematical theoretician who helped the west build an atom bomb and then sent those secrets to the Soviet Union. Rossiter turns what might have been a dull tale into a page turner. There is a lot of technical detail about bomb building that is impenetrable but it's the cat and mouse game between spy and MI5 that really grips. The spychasers tried and tried to nail him but in the end Fuchs confessed of his own volition and went to prison for ten years. Rossiter's thesis is that Fuchs was the lynchpin for how three countries-US, Soviet Union and Britain- got the bomb and he pretty much makes the case. What isn't much considered here is Fuchs' politics. As a left-wing German coming of age in the 1930s he quite naturally ended up in the communist party but why did this lead him to later help the Soviet Union? Rossiter claims Fuchs' rationale was balance of world power. If the US had the bomb Russia should also but that seems too pat an answer. Fuchs' politics were inscrutable and for a highly intelligent man poorly thought out.
March 30, 2017
Good story but the technical details that the author cites take away the excitement and suspense of a true spy story
February 28, 2015
Going into this I thought this book would read from more of a personal view with all the facts. To me this read more like a text book making it hard for me to get into. I persisted to finish this so I could understand why people were giving it five stars. While it's not a horrible read I found it lacking in material that would make the reader connect with the story and Fuchs.
March 29, 2025
Mathematical constructions based on esoteric observations have led to catastrophic weapons to further political gain. This is the basis on which nuclear development has proceeded since nuclear fission was confirmed in the late 1930s. It was known by many scientists from many nations. The issue becomes one of controlling information sharing among such a varied group of independent thinkers. Klaus Fuchs was one such. He grew up and was educated in the throes between German fascism and German communism in the 1920s and 30s. He wound up serving the communist side though no one realized it until too late. Like many other Jews and Communists, he was a refugee from Hitler's Germany that ended up in Great Britain. Unlike many others, he grew up in a moral Quaker family. Fuchs’ education was immersed in the political chaos that was post-World War I Germany. With so many refugee Europeans, security was a headache for those in the spy and anti-spy business in Britain and the United States. Fuchs was considered a risk and was interned for a while in Canada. He eventually got back to Britain since those in power thought his risk was overblown and then worked in British nuclear work. He was doing so well that he got invited to work for the United States at Los Alamos where the atomic bomb was being developed. However, since his early days in Britain and then in the U.S., he was passing nuclear weapon development secrets to Soviet Russian agents.
This book is a good summing up of Fuchs’ life and how he used his intelligence to hoodwink those who were looking for an undercover operative such as himself. The problem for the FBI and the British Secret Service was the many Europeans working on the project in many different locations in both countries. Fuchs was very clever and knew how to work the loopholes the security services could not possibly cover. This lasted throughout World War II and the post-war years up to 1950. Apparently, the pressure finally got to him and he finally confessed of his own volition in that year and perhaps did not fully appreciate the trouble he was in. Those with lesser offenses were executed. He only got a prison term. The story is well-told but since it was written by a British author, there is the occasional phrase or wording that may look odd to an American. A bigger problem with it is that, though there is a decent bibliography, there is no footnoting so statements of fact cannot be quickly checked with a look at a footnote. The author also does not refer to the title of the book explaining how Fuchs changed the world. Nevertheless, very informative.
This book is a good summing up of Fuchs’ life and how he used his intelligence to hoodwink those who were looking for an undercover operative such as himself. The problem for the FBI and the British Secret Service was the many Europeans working on the project in many different locations in both countries. Fuchs was very clever and knew how to work the loopholes the security services could not possibly cover. This lasted throughout World War II and the post-war years up to 1950. Apparently, the pressure finally got to him and he finally confessed of his own volition in that year and perhaps did not fully appreciate the trouble he was in. Those with lesser offenses were executed. He only got a prison term. The story is well-told but since it was written by a British author, there is the occasional phrase or wording that may look odd to an American. A bigger problem with it is that, though there is a decent bibliography, there is no footnoting so statements of fact cannot be quickly checked with a look at a footnote. The author also does not refer to the title of the book explaining how Fuchs changed the world. Nevertheless, very informative.
March 16, 2024
I was inspired to read this after watching the movie Oppenheimer. It was hard reading at times because of the subject matter, nuclear physics, but well written. The book adequately addresses the major turning points and accomplishments in Fuchs' life.
When I first saw the title of the book, The Spy Who Changed The World, my first reaction was that it exaggerated his contribution to the development of the atomic bomb. However, afterward I found it defensible. While Robert Oppenheimer and his team at Los Alamos, which included Fuchs, built the first atomic bomb, Fuchs, thanks to his espionage work was instrumental in the development of the Soviet Union's nuclear bomb, thus setting off the arms race that continues today. (Fuchs also contributed to the development of the UK's atomic bomb, which while important to the UK, did not have the same impact on the arms race.
Along with describing Fuchs work on atomic weaponry, Rossiter goes into some detail on how the Fuchs passed information on to the Soviet Union. Not only was Fuchs an outstanding physicist but also a highly effective spy. He evaded the counter-intelligence efforts in the UK and US for several years. While UK's MI-5 knew about his communist sympathies from his time in Germany and suspected him of being a spy, the agency never had enough information to charge him with any crimes. So how was he apprehended and convicted?
After multiple interrogations, he eventually confessed. Rossiter addresses this mystery head on, but he admits that his explanation is lacking. Rossiter speculates that the MI-5 interrogator hinted that if Fuchs confessed, he would be able to keep his position at Harwell, the UK's counterpart to Los Alamos. Why Fuchs believed this offer and why continuing his work at Harwell was so important to him, Rossiter does not have a good answer.
When I first saw the title of the book, The Spy Who Changed The World, my first reaction was that it exaggerated his contribution to the development of the atomic bomb. However, afterward I found it defensible. While Robert Oppenheimer and his team at Los Alamos, which included Fuchs, built the first atomic bomb, Fuchs, thanks to his espionage work was instrumental in the development of the Soviet Union's nuclear bomb, thus setting off the arms race that continues today. (Fuchs also contributed to the development of the UK's atomic bomb, which while important to the UK, did not have the same impact on the arms race.
Along with describing Fuchs work on atomic weaponry, Rossiter goes into some detail on how the Fuchs passed information on to the Soviet Union. Not only was Fuchs an outstanding physicist but also a highly effective spy. He evaded the counter-intelligence efforts in the UK and US for several years. While UK's MI-5 knew about his communist sympathies from his time in Germany and suspected him of being a spy, the agency never had enough information to charge him with any crimes. So how was he apprehended and convicted?
After multiple interrogations, he eventually confessed. Rossiter addresses this mystery head on, but he admits that his explanation is lacking. Rossiter speculates that the MI-5 interrogator hinted that if Fuchs confessed, he would be able to keep his position at Harwell, the UK's counterpart to Los Alamos. Why Fuchs believed this offer and why continuing his work at Harwell was so important to him, Rossiter does not have a good answer.
September 25, 2018
Fairly readable for such a dense weave of the life of Klaus Fuchs and the epic nature of the times he lived in. Technical details are given a short overview, as are political and historic backgrounds that allow the reader something on which to judge the actions of a man arguably far more 'giving' to the Soviet Union than, say, the Rosenbergs, even as Fuchs served 9 years in a British prison while the Rosenbergs were executed in the US.
There is less of the 'spy hunt' here than in, say, 'In the Enemy's House' by Howard Blum, although FBI agent Robert Lamphere does make an appearance at the end. This is first and foremost a story about Fuchs, though it ends with some ambiguity as to what his frame of mind was when he made his confession.
There was a line in 'Arnhem: The Battle for the Bridges, 1944' by Antony Beevor, to the effect that war crimes are only committed by, or at least prosecuted against, the losing side. That Fuchs passed along as much stolen bomb information to the British as he did to the Soviet Union in undeniable. Indeed, at Fuchs trial in Britian in 1950, his defense counsel begged the question: What would the charges against Fuchs be if the same charges had been brought against him in 1944, when the Allies were still concerned about a possible German A-bomb and Russia was wearing down the German army in the east?
Rossiter ends his book with the most intriguing chapter of all, an apparent stonewalling by MI5, to this day, of certain inconvenient records of tactics possibly used to convince the idealistic Fuchs to confess. If you see this book in a library and only have a moment, I suggest you jump to the Epilogue; it may just compel you to read the rest.
There is less of the 'spy hunt' here than in, say, 'In the Enemy's House' by Howard Blum, although FBI agent Robert Lamphere does make an appearance at the end. This is first and foremost a story about Fuchs, though it ends with some ambiguity as to what his frame of mind was when he made his confession.
There was a line in 'Arnhem: The Battle for the Bridges, 1944' by Antony Beevor, to the effect that war crimes are only committed by, or at least prosecuted against, the losing side. That Fuchs passed along as much stolen bomb information to the British as he did to the Soviet Union in undeniable. Indeed, at Fuchs trial in Britian in 1950, his defense counsel begged the question: What would the charges against Fuchs be if the same charges had been brought against him in 1944, when the Allies were still concerned about a possible German A-bomb and Russia was wearing down the German army in the east?
Rossiter ends his book with the most intriguing chapter of all, an apparent stonewalling by MI5, to this day, of certain inconvenient records of tactics possibly used to convince the idealistic Fuchs to confess. If you see this book in a library and only have a moment, I suggest you jump to the Epilogue; it may just compel you to read the rest.
March 7, 2018
This is a highly readable and detailed account of Klaus Fuchs life by Mike Rossiter. I've read quite a mountain of books about, or by, those who worked for the Soviet Union based on their ideological allegiance. While I was aware of Klaus Fuchs I had never really fully appreciated his background, the complex intrigues he was involved in, or his contribution not just to the Soviet bomb but that of the USA and UK. Rossiter traces Fuchs from his early days fighting against the rise of Nazism in Germany, his flight as a refugee, internment as an enemy alien, to his development as a world class mathematician and theoretical physicist who was in the right place at the right time to help create the most impressively destructive weapons developed by humanity. Unavoidably and happily this is also something of a potted history of the development of the Bomb. The development of the Bomb was shrouded in secrecy with the United States being the leading power in its development it also hoped to remain the holder of the secret and enjoy the unlimited status of unchallengeable world superpower. As history shows this hope was lost before it even occurred to the powers that be with the team developing the science riddled with spies. Despite its contribution to the international effort that produced Hiroshima and Nagasaki the UK was excluded from nuclear secrets by the US and post WWII left to develop its own bomb programme unaided... except for the invaluable contribution made by British Bomb spy Klaus Fuchs who was as generous with sharing his and his colleagues research with the British as he was with the USSR - one of the really fascinating aspects of Rossiters book. This account of Fuchs life and times is essential reading for anyone interested in the development of the Bomb, understanding why so many people were prepared to risk everything in an ideological battle and physics changed the world. It is ironic that the three first atomic powers all owed a great debt to Klaus Fuchs contribution to the success of their nuclear programmes yet none acknowledged or rewarded his contribution.
May 15, 2024
I'd been aware of Klaus Fuchs for some time; a youthful interest in spies and then learning more about the Manhattan project, the Rosenbergs, Alger Hiss, Whitaker Chambers et al. Fuchs always seemed a marginal figure in all this. Bizarrely I came across this in a pound shop and it may well be the best £1 I ever spent. Rossiter is almost dry in his writing, but I think that is in part because he is not shying away for the complexities of the problems in creating the atom bomb. At the heart of this creation is Klaus Fuchs, an emigre from Nazi Germany, part of an underground Communist resistance. Fuchs soon found his way into UK universities and proved to be a brilliant theoretical physicist and found his way to Los Alamos and a major player on the building of the bomb. And soon he was sharing his knowledge with his Soviet connection. He turned out to be a skilful spy. After the war he ended up working on the British bomb, arguably using US secret information that he gave to the British. Ultimately, he had the distinction of working on the creation of the US, UK and USSR atomic bomb programmes. It is a fascinating story that Rossiter tells with extraordinary clarity, having researched the files of the NKGB post glasnost, the released files of MI5 (some are still under lock and key) and documents from US archives. It is an incredible story, not with the fluency of le Carré, but this is the real thing. Rossiter tries to understand, but I don't feel he ever judges, neither Fuchs nor the UK intelligence services who overlooked him. That is for the reader.
January 18, 2019
I found this lesser known, but potentially extremely important, piece of 20th Century history, absolutely fascinating. For me, this was quite well written with plenty of detail. On the other hand, I should admit that I have a university education in a branch of physics, so I found the broad scientific descriptions of the leaked material just as interesting as the tradecraft and biography. The book feels as though the author has been trying to get to the truth, and this seems to have led him to a more sympathetic account of Fuchs' actions than I expected when I started reading.
I think it remains interesting to consider what might have happened had not Fuchs passed nuclear weapons secrets from the US to Russia and the UK, and from the UK to Russia. What would post-war history have looked like had not another power been able to develop nuclear weapons quickly enough to avoid total US hegemony? I think that's an interesting question and like much counterfactual history isn't easy to answer with certainty. On the other hand, the human race survived the twentieth century, so "could be worse" certainly applies... Perhaps this book contributes towards helping the reader think about such questions.
I think it remains interesting to consider what might have happened had not Fuchs passed nuclear weapons secrets from the US to Russia and the UK, and from the UK to Russia. What would post-war history have looked like had not another power been able to develop nuclear weapons quickly enough to avoid total US hegemony? I think that's an interesting question and like much counterfactual history isn't easy to answer with certainty. On the other hand, the human race survived the twentieth century, so "could be worse" certainly applies... Perhaps this book contributes towards helping the reader think about such questions.
October 14, 2020
The story of Klaus Fuchs could be considered as the reason why we do not have a nuclear war. A brilliant mathematician who hailed from Germany become a citizen of UK worked in the USA on the atom bomb and shared the secrets with Russia. A life that did change the course of history . Rossither takes us through this life by combining all the available information from intelligence archives and witnesses that it give me the reader a view into the mind of Fuchs.
The fact that Fuchs did not accept any remuneration for his spy work shows he was deeply committed to the concept of communism or probably knew the imbalance a nuclear weapon could have asked if Russia never was able to create one. There is no excuse for Fuch’s actions but I believe he was one of the reasons we have peace in some form today.
The fact that Fuchs did not accept any remuneration for his spy work shows he was deeply committed to the concept of communism or probably knew the imbalance a nuclear weapon could have asked if Russia never was able to create one. There is no excuse for Fuch’s actions but I believe he was one of the reasons we have peace in some form today.
August 4, 2020
Fascinating history of Klaus Fuchs, a key scientist in the development of the atom bomb, passing on information to Soviet Russia, which, doubtless, helped precipitate the frightening nuclear arms race in the years that followed.
It was a hard read to begin with, I almost put it down, but I soon came to really enjoy reading about Mr Fuchs and his astonishing life. I would have preferred a more intimate perspective that really got into his mind and emotions, but it was still a great read, nonetheless.
The unsolved mystery as to why such a brilliant man confessed to his spying when he was in the clear makes the book that much more compelling.
It was a hard read to begin with, I almost put it down, but I soon came to really enjoy reading about Mr Fuchs and his astonishing life. I would have preferred a more intimate perspective that really got into his mind and emotions, but it was still a great read, nonetheless.
The unsolved mystery as to why such a brilliant man confessed to his spying when he was in the clear makes the book that much more compelling.
January 14, 2018
Pretty amazing how a seemingly highly intelligent person could give away so much highly sensitive secrets to a foreign power. The main character was deeply involved with Communist activities while in college but comes away with a PhD in physics and seems highly talented. I don’t know how he could have divided his time and energies that way.
It’s a shame he was such an unrepentant spy. I don’t sympathize with him at all.
It’s a shame he was such an unrepentant spy. I don’t sympathize with him at all.
April 15, 2019
Apart from my interest in war time technology, I found it particularly interesting that such in depth intelligence was able to be obtained about Fuchs in the early-mid 20th century. I can only imagine just how extensive our current intelligence networks are.
November 21, 2024
I picked up this book expecting an easy scapegoat blame game for the foundation of the cold war. However I found myself empathizing heavily with Klaus Fuchs. This book perfectly blends biography with the larger picture of Klaus’ life. I learned a great deal of the human experience during this time and place and caught myself overhauling how I view political adversaries. A must read for anyone who enjoyed Oppenheimer and wants to learn the other side of the story.
October 20, 2018
Enjoyed this. Especially liked the glimpses of Richard Feynman.
January 20, 2022
Some parts read like a textbook.
November 9, 2023
Interesting and well researched biography, though I wouldn't have minded it being a little less heavy on technical details and focussing more on Fuchs's personality. 3.5/5
September 29, 2022
Fascinating
The book covers the entire episode concerning Fuchs’ role as a spy for USSR and raises very salient questions on why he confessed. It was very educative, at the same time as thrilling as a spy story
The book covers the entire episode concerning Fuchs’ role as a spy for USSR and raises very salient questions on why he confessed. It was very educative, at the same time as thrilling as a spy story
March 12, 2021
A deep probe into the mind of a conflicted genius. It's hard to blame him for his apparent lack of loyalty to the English scientific community - the British group consisted of many German scientists and Fuchs considered the Soviets as allies during the war. It appears that Fuchs felt himself above national loyalties, essentially a mercenary free to destribute the fruit of his research to whoever was interested. He had strong personal relationships with both US and British associates and felt few qualms about his underhanded dealings with the Russian spies.
Even if his motives aren’t clear - he accepted little money in exchange for the secret files he gave the Russians and was reluctant to reveal the names of his contacts - he seemed to think , naively, that he would be allowed to continue his work even after he was aware the British authorities realized he was dealing with the Soviets.
The question - should a scientist assume the political stance of the country that employs him? Fuchs was a communist in his youth as were his siblings, the Brits knew early on where his sympathies lay but they recognized his unique genius and for their own purposes they employed him. I felt a certain sympathy for Fuchs who never seemed to consider the political ramifications of his actions.
Even if his motives aren’t clear - he accepted little money in exchange for the secret files he gave the Russians and was reluctant to reveal the names of his contacts - he seemed to think , naively, that he would be allowed to continue his work even after he was aware the British authorities realized he was dealing with the Soviets.
The question - should a scientist assume the political stance of the country that employs him? Fuchs was a communist in his youth as were his siblings, the Brits knew early on where his sympathies lay but they recognized his unique genius and for their own purposes they employed him. I felt a certain sympathy for Fuchs who never seemed to consider the political ramifications of his actions.
October 26, 2014
Given the importance and scale of the material Klaus Fuchs passed on to the Soviets, Mike Rossiter claims he was the most significant spy of the twentieth century, and The Spy Who Changed The World tells Fuchs story drawing on declassified archive material in Britain, Germany and Russia. It’s a fascinating read, told through an engaging narrative that both maps out Fuch’s activities but also tries to make sense of them. The final chapters covering Fuch’s confession are particularly interesting because they seem so odd, Fuch’s being allowed to continue his work despite being under investigation and the slightly, amateurish comic cat-and-mouse game that was played out with British intelligence services. Rossiter admits that there are holes in the story, but that in some cases they are never likely to be filled due to the lack of documented evidence, and in others the material is still classified. Nevertheless, he’s done a good job of marshalling what material there is providing a nicely told biography.
October 16, 2014
the author in his style of writing is clearly trying to give the tone of trying to influence his readers to having the same sentiments he has to the main character. and he obviously achieved just that. after having read the book, instead of viewing the main character as a spy, a traitor who has no regard whatsoever for his colleague's intellectual abilities which had also contributed a huge sum towards the research on creating a nuclear weapon, a man with disillusioned beliefs, you start to sympathize with him and see him as brilliant physicist, a clever spy and a man, just about the same as everyone else who had principles which he upheld to be true. it is just regretful the neither of the three countries he had worked with recognized the extent of his contribution during the time of the nuclear arms race, which is clearly and undoubtedly logical and reasonable. :)
December 30, 2015
Originally posted on bluchickenninja.com.
This was a really fascinating book, its hard to believe that it actually happened. It feels more like a spy novel than an account of real events. Rossiter did a really good job of collating all the information available into a readable narrative. No easy feat considering the amount of information still classified.
I really enjoyed this book. It makes you feel sorry for Fuchs, he was undoubtably a brilliant physicist and an even better spy. Fuchs must have believed that what he was doing would help to achieve a balance between East and West. The only thing I would liked to have known more about is why he decided to turn himself in to MI6, unfortunately since Fuchs and his wife are now both dead that is something we will never know.
This was a really fascinating book, its hard to believe that it actually happened. It feels more like a spy novel than an account of real events. Rossiter did a really good job of collating all the information available into a readable narrative. No easy feat considering the amount of information still classified.
I really enjoyed this book. It makes you feel sorry for Fuchs, he was undoubtably a brilliant physicist and an even better spy. Fuchs must have believed that what he was doing would help to achieve a balance between East and West. The only thing I would liked to have known more about is why he decided to turn himself in to MI6, unfortunately since Fuchs and his wife are now both dead that is something we will never know.
February 18, 2017
Fantastic book. Thoroughly researched and well written. True story of a scientist who was also a communist spy betraying atomic/nuclear secrets to the USSR.
June 26, 2015
This book reads like a thriller. Truly it is said that Truth is stranger than fiction. The contribution of Klaus Fuchs may well have gone unrecognised, but he helped shape the power balance in the world which was more important than the nuclear bomb itself. It is unfortunate that we don't know why in the world he actually confessed to the espionage but what is definitely true is that both so called two great intelligence agencies were miserable failures.
This book should have a continuation with updates in a second volume. Lies, deceit and cover ups are part of global political system. Sometimes truth needs to triumph over power politics.
This book should have a continuation with updates in a second volume. Lies, deceit and cover ups are part of global political system. Sometimes truth needs to triumph over power politics.
July 18, 2016
(First I want to clarify that I've read it slowly not because it was boring or I did not really like it but because I read other books at the same time and I had to go to school and study) IT IS A VERY VERY GOOD BOOK. Really well writen (which is so so difficult), scientific sometimes but simply explain, other times very beautiful and touching, teaches a lot of things... Incredible how it is narrated, it could eaisly be so boring and difficult to understand and it's not. At some point you need to keep reading, you need to for all you learn and the story. I will for sure re-read it because is complex and I forget things, it has soo many. A masterpiece.
April 24, 2016
Klaus Fuchs was an enigma. A scientist who was crucial in the development of nuclear weapons for three super powers, a consummate spy who left no tracks, a quiet, thoughtful man whom women fell for and at the top of his game and producing more information than any other soviet spy, he confesses when it is plain that MI5 had little evidence against him. Rossiter has assembled a detailed description of the man.
May 13, 2020
Very interesting, albeit a bit longwinded for what it is. The most fundamental question of the story remains unanswered, though: Why did Fuchs finally confess to all of his spying when it seemed he was likely to get away with it all? A remarkable tale of cunning, physics (yes, there's a lot of physics in the book, perhaps too much) and staunch moral belief even in the face of current events.
July 29, 2025
Zajímavý příběh špionáže jednoho z vědců podílejících se na vývoji atomové bomby, celkem detailně rozebraný a popsaný. Některé pasáže byly velmi poutavé, pár méně. Rozhodně jsem se ale během čtení nenudil.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 31 reviews