After having a heart attack, a man tells us, “I realized it was not only my arteries that had hardened, I had hardened”. This is the quality of writing you can expect from this book, a Chicken Soup for the Soul knock-off with just as much god jammed in.
I wish books like this came with a Maslow's hierarchy of needs printed on the back indicating which level you belong to so you would know if the authors were speaking to you. This is a book for 1. Those who believe in a higher power or divine purpose, 2. Those who have their basic economic needs met, and 3. Those who have a support system. This book does not acknowledge systems of oppression or inequality, the entire book revolves around doing a Jedi mind trick to make you think the realities of this world are trivial compared to your inner power and the power of god. I sincerely wish there wouldn’t be a single other book ever written telling the poor and suffering to be grateful for their lot, can we please start writing more books on how to overthrow our oppressors? Maybe that’s wouldn’t be as lucrative for the authors.
The book has no sources, it references no studies. The entire book is made up solely of the authors personal reflections on life and death, and anecdotes to support those statements. A lot of the ideas seem to be lazily borrowed from Buddhism and expressed as superficially as possible. And there are no lessons, literally there are no lessons. There are only stories, opinions expressed. How do you achieve authenticity? How do you overcome fear? How to live in the moment? How to embrace anger? Essentially, how do you internalize anything presented in the book? You won’t find that here. The authors are just telling you what’s important, it’s up to you to do the heavy lifting. Well gee, thanks, I didn’t know authenticity and living in the moment was important, so glad someone with an M.D. was around to point it out for me.
Going back to the economic insensitivity, the book has such gems like, “If you say you would steal, you probably fear that you don’t have enough”. The book literally regurgitates the tired line, “Money doesn’t buy happiness”. Haven’t we moved past this patronizing phrase? Money buys food, shelter, clothing, medical care, and education. Stop pretending it’s the money itself that matters, it’s life that matters. “Money is an experience. Different from but not better than any other experience”. This is a lie, and insulting to the reader. “Wealth and poverty are states of mind”. Stop telling the poor to be happy with their lot through mindfulness from the top of your ivory tower and start telling them to eat the damn rich.
No one whose ever been abused needs to reach the chapter on love. “Love is beyond behavior”. “When you feel unloved, it is not because you are not receiving love, it is because you are withholding love”. “If you love them in spit of what they did, you will see changes, you will see all the power of the universe unleashed”. They make a big case for unconditional love, which toxic people to not respond to. Given the rates of child abuse and domestic violence in most nations, this seems completely out of touch. Please, do not provide love to people who cannot accept it, who do not respect you. And don’t be afraid to cut off toxic family, another concept they visit in pointing out how great it is our family is harder to escape from because of the hard lessons we’re forced to deal with by keeping them in our lives. Although the book does later contradict it’s advice that unconditional love is the goal, because others are not expected to give it. “Let’s ask ourselves if we are giving as much love as we wish to get, or if we expect people to love us dearly even if we are not so lovable and giving”. Rules for thee, not for me. We’re actually told that basing love on how funny we are, or how we treat our children, is conditional love and therefor not real or complete love. Like Buddhist literature, this book blatantly says were are not our actions, and leave that statement without delving into why or what we really are. A person is absolutely a sum of their thoughts, feelings, and actions. What, exactly, are we basing our love on then? What then, are we are supposed to do to “be” loving if we cannot think, feel, or behave in a loving way?
The book says just once that you should not stay in an abusive relationship, but repeatedly extolls the virtues of suffering for character development. I lost count of how many times it does this. We’re told about a woman who was abused by her alcoholic father, then married an abusive alcoholic, and doing this allowed her to work through her childhood trauma. No, what it did was give her more trauma, which motivated her to seek help. Trauma is just trauma, it’s absolutely the healthy thing to do to take lessons from it, but this glorification of suffering, this idea that we lowly peons must think ourselves out of pain inflicted by others is gross. Any course in developmental psychology will tell you trauma has real and lasting effects, especially in the young. Look up toxic stress, or PTSD. Children with loving parents show us that love, that good experiences, can shape us just as much as suffering.
There are portions of the book that read like straight victim blaming. “All relationships are reciprocal, meaning that we mirror our relationship partners. Since like attracts like we attract what’s inside of us”. This is the quote that follows an entire paragraph about how we shouldn’t seek to change anyone because no one is broken, no one needs to change, we should accept people for who they are and in turn we will be accepted. The entire first chapter is about seeking authenticity through change, through changing the false ideas and expectations we have about who we are. The National Sexual Violence Resource Center cites that 51% of female rape victims are raped by their partners. That’s a lot of women “mirroring” rapists and a lot of rapists who don’t need to change. If only we could accept them for who they are!
The book encourages people to parse out whether or not a relationship is “right” for you (not whether it’s abusive or toxic), but doesn’t provide any details as to how (remember, there are no lessons in Life Lessons). If you’ve ever been in an abusive relationship, you know just how your sense of reality becomes warped by manipulation and gaslighting. Making blanket statements like these and leaving them completely unexamined, without addressing systemic abuse, is irresponsible.
Phrases like “the word of god” and “a holy child of god” appear throughout. In fact, there are no stories of the non-religious who find acceptance amidst a difficult death. The story of Margaret & Frank shows Margaret fearing an existence without her husband, but then right before death she says she has found comfort because she has been told she’s going to a place where Frank already exists, and we are then encouraged to rethink our concept of time, which is an illusion anyway, to essentially encompass other dimensions. Troy & Jackie is another story, where at the moment of death Jackie accepts there will be an “other side” at Troy’s urging.
This is a religious book. If you are not religious, it is not geared towards you. The chapter on patience puts it bluntly, “The key to patience is knowing that everything is going to be fine, developing the faith that there is a plan”. First, that’s not the key to patience. You don’t need to tie the value of the virtue to a higher power, our lack of control does not mean someone else is in control. The entire book pushes this agenda, and maybe that’s why there are no instructions or exercises, because we’re not really meant to change, to alter our world. Everything is as it should be, because god made it so. So enjoy your painful death in the squalor that society has abandoned you to. Cheers.