Took me a few minutes to get into it but I ultimately enjoyed her observations, the exploration of relationships, and her wonderfully brief descriptions: "The sun faced precisely down the center of the street. Her shadow, when she looked backwards, was long and elegant..." I have seen my own shadow like that and "elegant" is exactly the right word, but I never would have thought of it. She does this throughout the book, and I wished I'd marked more of them - puts two simple words together which are so visual or conceptual within their brevity. But Glass is mostly examining the psychological behavior of her characters. Although I did not particularly connect to any of them, I did often to what they were thinking. In observing her husband and comparing him to her lover:
"She recognized his neat handwriting, his straight columns. In his precise way of doing things, he wasn't unlike Charlie, yet they were so different, Charlie so much more expansive, someone who looked ever outward. She wished that she and Charlie had been together long enough that some of the things she admired and loved about him had become cause for irritation - that his ardent resourcefulness had come to seem like rigidity, his sense of adventure like restlessness; that his playfulness could look immature, his lack of sentimentality cold instead of wise."
I also recognized her description of her friends: "The conversation at the dinner party was dense and eccentric, the talk of friends who no longer need the ordinary every day topics. The rich food led them to talk about the diets of vultures, parrots and Aztec kings; parrots and kings led them to to the future of zoos and elections. In smaller groups, they rhapsodized about Shakespeare's sonnets, laughed at Schwarzenegger's political ambitions, marveled at how C.S Lewis found God..."
Reminds me of my own dinner parties wit friends - ADHD, the lot of us.
It's a long book, 500 pages, but I liked it well enough to seek out her "Three Junes."