I have mixed feelings about this book.
It definitely wins points on the entertainment scale with its depravity. Those of us who have a morbid curiosity with true crime and tend to click on news stories with extreme, harrowing titles will definitely find this book right up their alley. Keep in mind that the author does acknowledge that there are certain times where he uses creative liberties to fill in the blanks on Michael’s story and while real or not, the nature of a lot of the horrible events that happen to Michael were written with such graphic depiction that I personally do not feel were necessary. If these events were real, I believe that author could have just eluded to what happened or implied it instead of going into as much detail as he did. It seems as though he did so more for the entertainment factor rather than adding significant information to the story. If these events did not actually happen, then that makes my theory so much more worse. Trigger Warnings for rape
One of the other major issues I had with the story is it’s characterization of schizophrenia. I understand that this was 1 unique case and this is the author’s personal experience but I wish that he had expressed the uniqueness of his brother’s case much more than he did. I worry that readers will think that all individuals who suffer from schizophrenia act/behave in the ways that Michael did or that this disease is a one size fits all. It is important to note that not everyone who is diagnosed with this form of schizophrenia will have the same challenges that Michael did. I don’t want to see this become the stereotype.
I also struggled with the ending, I don’t think it clearly lets the reader know what happened. Is Michael still incarcerated? Has Michael passed away? Did the doctors ever find a medication that would work for him? It felt like it just stops, with no clear closure. I also think a little more about how the family was able to move on and where they are now would have made a great ending. It was in need of an epilogue.
Finally, I thought keeping the news clippings in several chapters and censoring the names of those involved was pointless. I understand the censoring may have to do with privacy laws but honestly, I was able to look up the exact articles online with all of the information that the author was trying to hide. Providing the news source and titles of the articles was not a good idea if the goal was to protect privacy. Also, I struggle with the fact that the author is making money off of his brother’s illness. This bothers me a lot. I hope that it is used for charity or research on schizophrenia but I doubt it.
What I did like about the book was the family dynamics. I loved reading about how each family member dealt with what was going on and did a good job of capturing all of the frustrations, grief, and love they felt. I loved the backstories of how the family rose from poverty to middle class. I liked how the author was able to describe how isolating it can be to have a family member with mental illness and how neighbors, extended family do not understand what day to day life is like.
The thing I loved most about the book is how the author highlights our society’s lack of resources for those with severe mental illnesses. I loved the brief history given about the disestablishing of institutionalization and how the concept of “integrating” into the community took form. It did a good job at showing the holes into our systems and how something really bad like murder or suicide has to happen first before there is even a chance of psychiatric stays. It is sad that there is no safety net or help for these individuals.
Overall, Angelhead is an entertaining albeit disturbing story of the author’s lived experiences with a severely mentally ill brother, who fell through society’s cracks with dire consequences.
____________
RTC